I realize this isn't perfect. In some cases, it's not even good, the
servlet EG sound like it belongs in the 'not good' category. I think
we'd all like to see things changed so that there's a more open
process for spec development, and there is a lot of interest on the
JCP Exec Committee
Morgan Delagrange wrote:
Sam said that we should obtain nominations for chair
from people in the (potentially expanded) PMC ranks by
the 16th, followed by [a]n election where every
member of the PMC has one vote...to be completed on
the 18th.
Whoops, we're late.
Are we obligated to choose a chair
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Sam Ruby wrote:
Morgan Delagrange wrote:
Sam said that we should obtain nominations for chair
from people in the (potentially expanded) PMC ranks by
the 16th, followed by [a]n election where every
member of the PMC has one vote...to be completed on
the 18th.
Henri Yandell wrote:
My read is that if an election were held today, I would be running
unopposed. Instead of going through the motions and having a one party
election, I would much rather go month to month... in other words, if
any PMC member wants to call for an election at any time, it's OK
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 10:02 PM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 17/3/03 1:24 Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that there's been problem with the Servlet EG this time
around,
but what I'm saying is that there are avenues that we _could_ have
used to voice our concerns, but we
On 18/3/03 11:33 Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 10:02 PM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 17/3/03 1:24 Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that there's been problem with the Servlet EG this time
around,
but what I'm saying is that there
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 18/3/03 11:33 Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 10:02 PM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 17/3/03 1:24 Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that there's been problem with the Servlet EG this time
around,
but what I'm saying
On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 03:08 PM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 18/3/03 11:33 Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 10:02 PM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 17/3/03 1:24 Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that there's been problem with the Servlet EG
Sam Ruby wrote, On 18/03/2003 19.51:
...
Officially, I have been told that all that it entails is an email once a
quarter with the status to the board. This is a lie.
...
Hehehe... as an Avalon chair in these months, I know what that means too ;-)
...
the plus side is that you will have a
Does http://jakarta.apache.org/site/whoweare.html represent the PMC as it
currently is, or does it need updating?
What's the status of:
Future steps will include introduction of a concept of an emeritus PMC
member, reinstating prior PMC members who are still active. ?
[Sam Ruby, Jan 16th, PMC
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Sam Ruby wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Does http://jakarta.apache.org/site/whoweare.html represent the PMC as it
currently is, or does it need updating?
From the ASF's perspective, the official list is in the 'committers'
cvs repository in a file named
Henri Yandell wrote:
I've updated the site from the file. Btw, Thomas Mahler's name is not in
alphabetical order in the file.
You updated the site but you didn't update the file? Are you waiting
for permission or something? ;-)
Hen
- Sam Ruby
P.S. Thanks!
Ok ok. Done.
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Sam Ruby wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
I've updated the site from the file. Btw, Thomas Mahler's name is not in
alphabetical order in the file.
You updated the site but you didn't update the file? Are you waiting
for permission or something? ;-)
13 matches
Mail list logo
