On 16/03/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Poorly explained by me. The file would be deleted once it had served its
purpose.
Oh OK my misunderstanding, that changes things a bit.
An alternative is a mail thread to which everyone must answer to
remain on the PMC - however a file in
-
robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
23/03/2006 20:30:12:
i think that we need to start breaking the legal and formal organisation
from the ontological. all the components in the various commons across
apache are similar in many ways. users should really need to care which
Idiot
patepstry
WTF!? Tapestry obviously.
/Idiot :-D :-D
d.
***
The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s)
only. If you are not the intended recipient
thx Martin.
(I can't ssh anywhere from behind work firewall.)
On 04/08/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have to do that on people.apache.org in the /www/jakarta.apache.org/site
directory...
I done the update for you already :)
1) Every existing committer not on the pmc receives an email asking if
they would like to join the pmc. Once that email is sent they are marked
in a file as having had the email sent and we can wash our hands until a
reply comes in.
I know that this is something that we had as the end-game
2. Vendor support. This is getting increasingly threadbare - so
raising the removal of this again. Content to be moved to the Wiki.
Why not just move all of the content of all of these pages to the wiki and
change the links.
Or better still have a section of wiki links in the right hand nav
On 12/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5. Translation sites. They can't keep up, time to go I think.
-1
I think this is an interesting one, perhaps we should think about
setting standards for translation sites which might let us feel more
comfortable linking to. along the
I'm +0 for opening. I'm enthusiastic on pushing POI out of Jakarta to
remove this restriction. While I agree that POI fits Jakarta theme-wise,
this access restriction thing feels too much like a wart.
Same here, as no-one has ack#ed my resignation I'm going to vote +0 for
this.
I think that
+1 to this thread (the Jakarta parts - not the let's all talk about
our kids, but if anyone wants to I'm as talkative as any other father
:) ).
+1 to making progress -1 to re-running the old bile.
My kids both got hamsters yesterday (early for christmas), boy was that
ever exciting! :-)
d.
As we get more and more into auth, it becomes tempting to auth the
whole thing. Vote through the webapp and not an email,
You could sign your mail with a key you register for the purpose.
listens to emails and a script that sends out emails in a particular
format. Might work, but parsing
Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22/12/2006 09:21:51:
Hi Danny,
As we get more and more into auth, it becomes tempting to auth the
whole thing. Vote through the webapp and not an email,
You could sign your mail with a key you register for the purpose.
that's a big hurdle
I see jakarta has a news feed, I'd like to nick the idea for James.
How did you do that?
d.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Henning, I will do.
Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/03/2007 12:04:53:
As you seem to be building your site with maven: If you use maven 2, I'd
like to invite you to check out
http://velocity.apache.org/site/tools/velocity-site-news/index.html
Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/03/2007
21:31:17:
Not if the code is developed outside the ASF (as seems the case here).
Hmm, is that so? Looking at the charter
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/charter.html
I could not find something like that.
It is possbible to
On 5/14/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As my random suggestion that Ted quoted points out, you can have a PMC
without their having to be TLP. Least I was told that a couple of
years ago either on board@ or face to face, so we could do the
following:
* Create the Jakarta Commons PMC,
On 5/8/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] +1 I support the proposal
[ ] +0 I don't care
[ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because...
-1
I would like to see the issues raised regarding the name resolved.
I would also like to see the options regarding commons as a successor
to
On 5/14/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If moving commons TLP is just a twisted (maybe a bad choice of a word) way to
come back to
jakarta.apache.org in the end, I am -1 on the TLP move..
IF, its a big if and one I think we need to devote some though, and a
*modest* ;-)
On 5/15/07, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From a practical pov isn't java already associated with the word grouping
commons apache?
No, that's the point http://commons.apache.org/
Although this commons project was supposed to replace the commons
efforts in jakarta.apache and
Hi,
Ok, I've followed the commons TLP vote thread with some interest
because it seems to impact directly on the end-game for Jakarta.
I believe that we have to make some pretty fundamental decisions about
that future before we can fully resolve the commons TLP issues.
0/ Do we agree that the
On 5/21/07, J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This thread has been more quiet than I expected.
I thought so too.
There are two points which I'd like to make from the things that have
been said so far,
1/ From Ted H. Whenever we foster healthy communities that create
great software, we
On 5/21/07, J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This thread has been more quiet than I expected.
Actually, thinking about it, perhaps that's because we all think we
know where this is inevitably going and we're just waiting for it all
to settle out.
d.
On 5/21/07, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1/ Open-up Jakarta to all committers, was vetoed
2/ Merge commons into Jakarta, was vetoed
3/ Move commons into own TLP, was vetoed
So what's left in your opinion?
Work with the people who cast the deadlocking vetoes to resolve their
issues
On 5/21/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If someone wants to turn Jakarta into a Java portal, then turn Jakarta
into a Java portal. Some of the codebases may still be under the
Jakarta PMC umbrella, but would have little effect on using the
Jakarta site as a portal to the ASF's Java
On 5/21/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/21/07, Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok Ownership is perhaps the wrong word, if Jakarta is being
disbanded who provides the oversight?
The same people who provide oversight for any ASF project: The people
doing the work.
If anyone
On 5/22/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's pretty simple to solve this though (even though repeating myself here) :
Let (a flattened)
commons become Jakarta..
I thought that that idea was unpopular with some commons commiters on this PMC?
d.
On 6/7/07, Thomas Vandahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this procedure ... documented somewhere?
Yes.. http://jakarta.apache.org/site/jakarta-site2.html
d.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On 6/7/07, Thomas Vandahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Danny Angus wrote:
Yes.. http://jakarta.apache.org/site/jakarta-site2.html
I've never seen this before. What link would have taken me there? From
jakarta.apache.org, I mean?
Oh I don't know the answer to *that* question! I just knew the page
This is not the right place to get help, try the tomcat users list.
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html
P.S. you probably need to add the extension and the mime type to a
configuration file.
d.
Zilberstein Yuval [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28/06/2007
16:22:02:
Hello all,
I have an image
201 - 228 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
