On 5/21/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1/ Open-up Jakarta to all committers, was vetoed 2/ Merge commons into Jakarta, was vetoed 3/ Move commons into own TLP, was vetoed So what's left in your opinion?
Work with the people who cast the deadlocking vetoes to resolve their issues and uncover a compromise which is acceptable to the majority. I'm not sure why 1/ is vetoed, unless this is related to the POI confusion over M$ IP. In which case POI TLP should remove that veto. 2/ commons TLP should resolve this 3/ veto was mainly detail around name and the wording of the resolution, no reason to suppose this won't be resolved. the proposal received -1's but the people who voted -1 should work with the community to get their concerns resolved, not simply block all progress. d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
