+1
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> This is a vote to consolidate the development lists at Jakarta into
> one development and one notifications list. For background including
> timing, anticipated benefits and some discussion, see proposal [1]
> thread.
>
> [X] +1
> [ ] -1
[+1] Go Speed Racer, go.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org
Ok, here is my +1 again.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1, for sure...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to have Petar Tahchiev as a Jakarta Committer.
Petar currently works as software engineer in Bulgaria, but was a MSc
student last year, when we proposed porting the Cactus build to Maven
2 as a "GSOC" (Google Summer of Code) project. Although the project
didn't ma
Henri Yandell wrote:
Mail: (Aug 19 data)
192 - jakarta-cactus-dev
Cactus-user doesn't show up because its archives are broken on
mail-archives. Nothing since 2003.
Cactus user has had more activity than the cactus-dev, which get most of
its message from Gump notifications (for instance
Henri Yandell wrote:
Mail: (Aug 19 data)
192 - jakarta-cactus-dev
Cactus-user doesn't show up because its archives are broken on
mail-archives. Nothing since 2003.
Cactus-user has had more activity than the cactus-dev, which get most of
its message from Gump notifications (for instance, I've j
Hi Phil,
On 6/23/06, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With his permission, I am forwarding an excerpt from a recent post from
Roy Fielding, in response to questions about a proposed "Security" TLP
originating out of the XML project. The concerns he raises below all
pretty much apply dir
Hi all,
Sorry for being quiet so far regarding this issue, but I've been too
busy with other real-life subjects (besides, it's World Cup time :-).
Anyway, I've read all messages and will try to write a 'condensed'
reply of all pertinent issues, plus a couple of statements summarizing
them. As su
Hi Jesse,
Initially, the idea was to provide Java-related testing projects. Not
that we were against a language-agnostic project - we just didn't think
about that. After the proposal, someone raised the questions if we would
accepts contributions from other languages and we said it would be fi
Henri Yandell wrote:
The answer, I believe, is that "yes testing.apache.org would welcome
communities built around non-Java test tools. ". ie) No indecipherable
code dumps, but if a facet of the testing community wants to build
around a language other than Java - the more the merrier.
Any di
On 4/24/06, Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, while I simply don't care on this particular issue. I object to
> the bizarre form of this vote by procedure as a
> matter of practice. On these issues:
>
> 1. If you don't get any response from the dev list of that project
> coming t
Hi all,
After the second run, the move has finally been approved!
Here are the final votes:
*** Binding (PMC Members) votes in order they were received
+1 Felipe Leme
+1 Peter Lin
+1 Yoav Shapira
+0 Sebastian Bazley
+0 Henri Yandell
+1 Vincent Massol
+1 Stephen Colebourne
+1 Scott Eade
+1
Hi all,
In the last months, there have been some discussions internally (at
Jakarta PMC, Cactus and JMeter lists) about creating a new Testing TLP
(Apache Top Level Project) and moving Cactus and JMeter out of Jakarta
to this new project (which eventually could grow and 'acquire' more
projects, li
You're right - good catch!
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Cactus 1.17.2 was released on March 26th, 2006.
Shouldn't that be 1.7.2?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
On 4/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone know if Bugzilla has the same issue?
I haven't used Bugzilla for a while, but as far as I can remember
(from the taglib days), it's quite the opposite: everyone (and I mean
every bugzilla user, not just jakarta commiters) can do whateve
On 4/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Etiquette-wise, it's good etiquette to send an email prior to your first
> changes to a codebase.
Yes, you're right. And in fact I've intended to do so: I subscribed to
the dev list prior to committing but somehow I forgot to send that
message
Hi Hen,
On 4/3/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Following this email I'll modify things such that we have the following
> auth groups:
>
> jakarta (union of all jakarta-* groups + tapestry)
> jakarta-pmc (remains the same)
> jakarta-commons-sandbox (difference of jakarta group and
Hi Rahul,
Cactus hasn't got away yet, but assuming it does, you can sign yourself as a
PMC for the new project - you're help would be greatly welcome.
-- Felipe
PS: here's Hen's message about signing up:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-cactus-dev/200603.mbox/ajax/[EMAIL
PROTEC
Henri Yandell wrote:
[X] +1
[ ] -1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Cactus project is pleased to announce the release of version 1.7.2.
Cactus is a unit testing framework for testing server side java code.
Goals
-
This release was created just because the previous 1.7.x releases have
bundled an LGPL jar (jboss-j2ee.jar, necessary to run the samples), whic
Hi Rahul (and others),
First of all, sorry for the delay (but as they say here "Better later
than never" :-)
No, I haven't heard from Pierre and I guess he haven't heard from his
managers (as normally he is quick on answer such issues).
My feeling is that Sun will not put any efforts on Jak
Henri Yandell wrote:
Inactive Subprojects
* Cactus
Cactus is more on a 'Hibernation' status; I agree there hasn't been
activities in the last weeks, but we have some stuff planned (for
instance, I should have relased Cactus 1.7.2 to fix the jboss-j2ee.jar
issue, but couldn't do so yet
Henri Yandell wrote:
1) Remove SVN restrictions, all Jakarta committers can commit anywhere
in Jakarta, with the exception of the Commons-Sandbox as it allows
Apache committers in general to commit.
I'm +1 on this one. As others already pointed out, it would help to keep
dormant/stable proje
Henri Yandell wrote:
On the people side of things, that means finding Manual, getting his
permission and then talking to any other committers (who'll probably be
fine with it I suspect if Manual has said yes).
Good news - I've found Manuel and he agreed; I also 'grepped' for the
total of aut
Henri Yandell wrote:
* Cactus: Seem to be +1 on a testing.apache.org TLP
By speaking of the TAO TLP (cool name :-), I 'extended' the invitation
to the dbunit project (which is currently on SourceForge and facing some
administrative issues over there) and they agreed.
Actually, by 'they' I
Henri Yandell wrote:
- Silk. I'm still unable to understand how we get permission to use the
name, and am just posting to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list every so often.
Why? What's the issue with the name?
Ideas?
Ideas for a new name?
Current efforts in this area: archiving inactive
Henri Yandell wrote:
[X] +1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
projects, but still, i must ask this to the FtpServer developers (i don´t
know who they are).
Hmm, there is a Maven-generated link that says "Who We Are" :-)
I didn´t find this information on the site.
Here is the link I mentioned:
http://incubator.apache.org/pro
Hi,
I tried to update the site with the last Cactus release, but it didn't
work - guess I need SVN karma.
Could someone please fix that?
Tks,
-- Felipe (user felipeal)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additio
Henri Yandell wrote:
Please vote from the following shortlist of names. Please ignore the Web
vs Web App vs Webapp issue for the moment.
[X]Apache Silk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
Martin Cooper wrote:
Some other names were added to the wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/CreatingCommonsForWebComponents
I forgot to add some names to that page:
Webbies(has the same idea of weblets, but causing less confusion)
Jakartlets (someone suggested we use a name without
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
point)... It seems like there might be a risk of sub-projects within
sub-projects within sub-projects, which I'm not sure would be the best
organizational stucture... if you had Jakarta Taglibs as a sub-component
of the JWP4J project (assume for the sake of argument that
Hello all,
What's the status on the new project proposal? Has the discussion moved
to another list or has it just staled?
Anyway, the Jakarta Taglib Project has voted how it would like to take
part on this new project, and the result was:
1.The Jakarta Taglibs Project would like to be merge
Martin Cooper wrote:
+1 to just one dev and one user list, shared for all components, a la
Jakarta Commons.
Me too...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henri Yandell wrote:
are there any committers involved with JSTL around?
Sorry, I raised the question then entered in JavaOne-sleep-mode :(
if not, would anyone like to volunteer to sound them out about a move to
subproject status?
I vote for Standard being a separate Jakarta sub-project.
Felipe Leme wrote:
I'd like to suggest 2 things:
...
3
Damn, beaten by the ENTER key again :-(
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache Wiki wrote:
Please do not edit comments into this text: please use the CharterForWebCommonsRequestForComments
> or post to [http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html General At
Jakarta].
OK, here I am posting :-)
I'd like to suggest 2 things:
1.We prefereably use Maven for the build
I also fixed the alphabetic order of the existing proposals (but
accidently typed enter before adding that comment).
Apache Wiki wrote:
The comment on the change is:
- added my suggestions
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 03:53 -0500, Steve Cohen wrote:
> Might that rule have possibly been overly strict? I notice at least two
> posts that should have gone out in the past day - one a post I made half
> an hour ago to the ant-dev list that still has not appeared on the list.
Hmm, I think i
Opt for one with support for NPTL - RH 9 was the first mainstream distro
to have it available, but I think most of then supports it now:
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/JavaTechandLinux/RedHat/
Another aspect that I think it's very important is good fonts - that's
the ma
On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 21:15, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> though committing a few risky patches in the hope of recruiting a new
> committer might seem like a good plan, there are definite drawbacks.
I agree. I didn't mean that all patches, but they should at least be
'acknowledged'. Even a co
I would add a note to Danny's comment: treat contributors as your
primary users.
I have seem many projects (inside and outside ASF) where people submit
patches and the patches are just ignored, without even an explanation
why it was not accepted. I know that applying a patch is not that simple
in
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 05:31, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> How about two lines, which you can already do today?
>
> try {
> ...
> } catch (Exception e) {
> ...
> }
The problem with such approach is that it catches all exception, checked
or not (see below)
> seems to be a standarized "log it and
Hi Kevin,
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 18:00, Kevin Burton wrote:
> It's about a 1.5 months away but I figured I would try to get a pulse on
> how much interest there is in holding a JavaOne BOF.
I think it would be great. We could have representatives of some
projects talking a couple of minutes about
45 matches
Mail list logo
