Re: [Proposal] HiveMind Service Framework / status

2003-11-26 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Ear is better, mostly itches now.  Don't think I blew the drum as I can hear
fine.  However I now have a cold too. :-(

-Andy

On 11/26/03 8:03 AM, "Howard M. Lewis Ship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm trying to track down that myself. I need to give my friends at WebCT a
> call, to see where they
> are with the software grant. Between that, ApacheCon, a bad cold (how's that
> ear, Andy?) and the
> 9-to-5 (oh, and painters in my house) I'm falling a little behind.
> 
> --
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
> http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 10:29 PM
>> To: Jakarta General List
>> Subject: Re: [Proposal] HiveMind Service Framework
>> 
>> 
>> +1 - there is room enough.
>> 
>> On a related note, what is the current status of HiveMind?
>> the site is 
>> still blanked out in Commons.  Could someone please update
>> general as to 
>> the current situation re: HiveMind?
>> 
>> Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
>> 
>>> I don't think that Avalon has any right to have a stranglehold on all
>>> service frameworks.  I also must say that I hate the "come
>> discuss this in
>>> 'our' house" approach to collaboration.   One size does not
>> fit all and
>>> Avalon has shown over the years that this is especially true
>> for it.  I say
>>> that Howard Lewis Ship is a skilled coder and community
>> builder and if he
>>> wants to give it a try with HiveMind, while the topic bores
>> me personally,
>>> I'll give him my support.  If he does want to collaborate with the
>>> Avalonites (Avaloners?) then he should be encouraged to do
>> so; however, if
>>> his approach is different enough to warrant its own show
>> then I encourage
>>> him to do that as well.  I trust his judgment to that effect.
>>> 
>>> We have Struts, Turbine, and Avalon.  We have Velocity, JSP,
>> XSLT, etc.  We
>>> have commons digester and XMLBeans...  None are "preferred"
>> and BTW Avalon
>>> isn't even "preferred" as Tomcat, for instance, doesn't use it.
>>> 
>>> To suggest that there can be only one "true" service
>> framework is misguided,
>>> IMHO.
>>> 
>>> -Andy
>>> 
>>> On 11/18/03 12:49 AM, "Stephen McConnell"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
 Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:

 
> I'm moniroting the avalon dev list.
>  
> 
 Howard:
 
 As mentioned earlier there are some things that would be
>> interesting to
 discuss over on the avalon dev list.  Perhaps you could put
>> forward you
 thoughts about the potential or lack thereoff on
>> collaboration.  I think
 some good points have already been put on the table for
>> working together
 and for working apart - but just at the moment these
>> thoughts are only
 on the table and no real discussion is happening as a
>> result.  I think
 that could change if we were to go beyond mutual monotoring.
 
 Cheers, Steve.
 
 
 

 
> --
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
> http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
> 
> 
>  
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>> Stephen McConnell
>> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:10 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [Proposal] HiveMind Service Framework
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 
>>
>> 
>>> I've put up a limited copy of the HiveMind documentation on
>>>  
>>> 
>> my personal home page:
>> 
>> Howard:
>> 
>> Are you open to the idea of discussing some mutual areas
>> of interest?
>> 
>> There are a number of aspects of the work you are doing that are
>> complimentary with the work on-going in Avalon, and
>> several areas in
>> Avalon which after review your material are complimentary
>> with your own
>> efforts.  Can I get you to sign up to the avalon dev list
>> bacause I
>> would very much like to discuss this further together with
>> other members
>> of the Avalon crew.
>> 
>> Details for the Avalon dev list are available at the
>> following URL:
>> 
>>
>> 
>   http://avalon.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
> 
> I'm looking forward to hearing from you.
> 
> Cheers, Stephen.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
>> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
> 
 
>> -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

RE: [Proposal] HiveMind Service Framework / status

2003-11-26 Thread Weaver, Scott
I for one am hoping the IP stuff is resolved soon.  We are planning to evaluate 
Hivemind along with a couple other component frameworks for Jetspeed 2 to replace the 
temporary Fulcrum implementation that is current in place.  I have been reading the 
Hivemind docs and must say I am pretty excited play around with it.

Regards,
** 
| Scott T Weaver |
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>| 
| Apache Jetspeed Portal Project |
| Apache Pluto Portlet Container |
**

> -Original Message-
> From: Howard M. Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:03 AM
> To: 'Jakarta General List'
> Subject: RE: [Proposal] HiveMind Service Framework / status
> 
> I'm trying to track down that myself. I need to give my friends at WebCT a
> call, to see where they
> are with the software grant. Between that, ApacheCon, a bad cold (how's
> that ear, Andy?) and the
> 9-to-5 (oh, and painters in my house) I'm falling a little behind.
> 
> --
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
> http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 10:29 PM
> > To: Jakarta General List
> > Subject: Re: [Proposal] HiveMind Service Framework
> >
> >
> > +1 - there is room enough.
> >
> > On a related note, what is the current status of HiveMind?
> > the site is
> > still blanked out in Commons.  Could someone please update
> > general as to
> > the current situation re: HiveMind?
> >
> > Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> >
> > >I don't think that Avalon has any right to have a stranglehold on all
> > >service frameworks.  I also must say that I hate the "come
> > discuss this in
> > >'our' house" approach to collaboration.   One size does not
> > fit all and
> > >Avalon has shown over the years that this is especially true
> > for it.  I say
> > >that Howard Lewis Ship is a skilled coder and community
> > builder and if he
> > >wants to give it a try with HiveMind, while the topic bores
> > me personally,
> > >I'll give him my support.  If he does want to collaborate with the
> > >Avalonites (Avaloners?) then he should be encouraged to do
> > so; however, if
> > >his approach is different enough to warrant its own show
> > then I encourage
> > >him to do that as well.  I trust his judgment to that effect.
> > >
> > >We have Struts, Turbine, and Avalon.  We have Velocity, JSP,
> > XSLT, etc.  We
> > >have commons digester and XMLBeans...  None are "preferred"
> > and BTW Avalon
> > >isn't even "preferred" as Tomcat, for instance, doesn't use it.
> > >
> > >To suggest that there can be only one "true" service
> > framework is misguided,
> > >IMHO.
> > >
> > >-Andy
> > >
> > >On 11/18/03 12:49 AM, "Stephen McConnell"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>I'm moniroting the avalon dev list.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>Howard:
> > >>
> > >>As mentioned earlier there are some things that would be
> > interesting to
> > >>discuss over on the avalon dev list.  Perhaps you could put
> > forward you
> > >>thoughts about the potential or lack thereoff on
> > collaboration.  I think
> > >>some good points have already been put on the table for
> > working together
> > >>and for working apart - but just at the moment these
> > thoughts are only
> > >>on the table and no real discussion is happening as a
> > result.  I think
> > >>that could change if we were to go beyond mutual monotoring.
> > >>
> > >>Cheers, Steve.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>--
> > >>>Howard M. Lewis Ship
> > >>>Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
> > >>>http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
> > >>>http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
> > >>>http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>

RE: [Proposal] HiveMind Service Framework / status

2003-11-26 Thread Howard M. Lewis Ship
I'm trying to track down that myself. I need to give my friends at WebCT a call, to 
see where they
are with the software grant. Between that, ApacheCon, a bad cold (how's that ear, 
Andy?) and the
9-to-5 (oh, and painters in my house) I'm falling a little behind.

--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
http://javatapestry.blogspot.com

> -Original Message-
> From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 10:29 PM
> To: Jakarta General List
> Subject: Re: [Proposal] HiveMind Service Framework
> 
> 
> +1 - there is room enough. 
> 
> On a related note, what is the current status of HiveMind? 
> the site is 
> still blanked out in Commons.  Could someone please update 
> general as to 
> the current situation re: HiveMind?
> 
> Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> 
> >I don't think that Avalon has any right to have a stranglehold on all
> >service frameworks.  I also must say that I hate the "come 
> discuss this in
> >'our' house" approach to collaboration.   One size does not 
> fit all and
> >Avalon has shown over the years that this is especially true 
> for it.  I say
> >that Howard Lewis Ship is a skilled coder and community 
> builder and if he
> >wants to give it a try with HiveMind, while the topic bores 
> me personally,
> >I'll give him my support.  If he does want to collaborate with the
> >Avalonites (Avaloners?) then he should be encouraged to do 
> so; however, if
> >his approach is different enough to warrant its own show 
> then I encourage
> >him to do that as well.  I trust his judgment to that effect.
> >
> >We have Struts, Turbine, and Avalon.  We have Velocity, JSP, 
> XSLT, etc.  We
> >have commons digester and XMLBeans...  None are "preferred" 
> and BTW Avalon
> >isn't even "preferred" as Tomcat, for instance, doesn't use it.
> >
> >To suggest that there can be only one "true" service 
> framework is misguided,
> >IMHO.
> >
> >-Andy
> >
> >On 11/18/03 12:49 AM, "Stephen McConnell" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I'm moniroting the avalon dev list.
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>Howard:
> >>
> >>As mentioned earlier there are some things that would be 
> interesting to
> >>discuss over on the avalon dev list.  Perhaps you could put 
> forward you
> >>thoughts about the potential or lack thereoff on 
> collaboration.  I think
> >>some good points have already been put on the table for 
> working together
> >>and for working apart - but just at the moment these 
> thoughts are only
> >>on the table and no real discussion is happening as a 
> result.  I think
> >>that could change if we were to go beyond mutual monotoring.
> >>
> >>Cheers, Steve.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>--
> >>>Howard M. Lewis Ship
> >>>Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
> >>>http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
> >>>http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
> >>>http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Stephen McConnell
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Proposal] HiveMind Service Framework
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> >I've put up a limited copy of the HiveMind documentation on
> >  
> >
> my personal home page:
> 
> Howard:
> 
> Are you open to the idea of discussing some mutual areas 
> of interest?
> 
> There are a number of aspects of the work you are doing that are
> complimentary with the work on-going in Avalon, and 
> several areas in
> Avalon which after review your material are complimentary
> with your own 
> efforts.  Can I get you to sign up to the avalon dev list 
> bacause I
> would very much like to discuss this further together with
> other members 
> of the Avalon crew.
> 
> Details for the Avalon dev list are available at the 
> following URL:
> 
> 
> 
> >>>   http://avalon.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
> >>>
> >>>I'm looking forward to hearing from you.
> >>>
> >>>Cheers, Stephen.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>---
> --
> >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>
> -
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---