Not a vote result, since it is just a conclusion from my side.
Jakarta hat on
Even though there are enough +1's to start sponsoring ssl, I think I want to
see a lot more support
than what I currently see (I mean active support). So at this stage I don't
think it is wise that
Jakarta should
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Not a vote result, since it is just a conclusion from my side.
Personal hat on
Since there are more (Apache) projects interested in ssl, I think however we
can get enough people
on board to do a successful incubation, so I offered to Julius to help him
out
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 23:35 +0100, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based on that
result the path full
incubation / legal incubation is decided.
So in my view the vote should be :
[x] Jakarta should sponsor (which effectively
Let's keep this statement your personal opinion on the fact that it is
not
relevant. I still like to
know the opinion of others.
If you want opinions, don't use a vote to collect them. This is a vote
thread, not an opinion thread. Votes within the ASF are for decision
making,
not
On 2/24/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's keep this statement your personal opinion on the fact that it is
not
relevant. I still like to
know the opinion of others.
If you want opinions, don't use a vote to collect them. This is a vote
thread, not an opinion
Since there is no stated end date to this vote: Please let
it (or it's replacement) run until at least March 4th.
Oleg will be working through a mail backlog that week-end.
If this vote thread should be replaced next week, I will not
be able to re-cast my vote until the week-end of March 10/11.
On 2/23/07, Julius Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Jakarta-General,
Let's vote on where to put this code! Here's the code right now:
http://juliusdavies.ca/commons-ssl/
Forgive my newbieness; I hope these are the right options:
[] Sub-module in Httpcomponents.
IMO it would have to
[+1] Full Incubator.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Julius -
I have a question. Does not-yet-commons-ssl allow me to virtual
host multiple domain ssl certificates on a single socket on a Tomcat
4.1.31 server?
That would be awesome if it does.
Unofficial +1
Regards,
Dave Fisher
On Feb 23, 2007, at 11:57 AM, Julius Davies wrote:
Hi,
Hi, David,
What do you mean, exactly?
Do you have several certificates? If so, then no, can't share several
certificates on one socket. There isn't enough information available
to the plain socket (source ip, source port, target ip, target port is
all we have!) to decide on a certificate to
I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based on that
result the path full
incubation / legal incubation is decided.
So in my view the vote should be :
[ ] Jakarta should sponsor (which effectively states we like to see the code
end up here)
[ ] Jakarta shouldn't
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based on that
result the path full
incubation / legal incubation is decided.
So in my view the vote should be :
[X] Jakarta should sponsor (which effectively states we like to see the code
end
Hi, Jakarta-General,
Let's vote on where to put this code! Here's the code right now:
http://juliusdavies.ca/commons-ssl/
Forgive my newbieness; I hope these are the right options:
[+1] Sub-module in Httpcomponents.
[+1] Sandbox.
[+1] Full Incubator.
[-1] not-yet-commons-ssl is not a good
On 2/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based on
that result the path full
incubation / legal incubation is decided.
So in my view the vote should be :
[ ] Jakarta should sponsor (which effectively states we like
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 2/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based on
that result the path full
incubation / legal incubation is decided.
So in my view the vote should be :
[ ] Jakarta should sponsor (which
On 2/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 2/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based
on
that result the path full
incubation / legal incubation is decided.
So in my
16 matches
Mail list logo
