derby build (was: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-01-23 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Jan 22, 2005, at 4:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project derby (in module db-derby) failed First, many thanks Stephan for cleaning up my attempt at a project file for derby! I'll be glad to help get the

Re: derby build

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Jan 24, 2005, at 3:32 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Is there a work-around for this? I mean other than install JDK 1.3's rt.jar somewhere on brutus.apache.org. If not, well, then we'll just do that. Unfortunately, I cannot think of another workaround. There is no substitute for the JDK 1.3

Re: derby build

2005-02-01 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Jan 26, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: I don't think this is going to work with JDK 1.4's rt.jar on the bootclasspath. We could give it a try, even though build.sysclasspath=last is not strictly the Gump way (you can swap in your own dependency libs that way). Well, it didn't work.

Re: derby build

2005-02-02 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Feb 2, 2005, at 2:43 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Andrew McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I still get the same error for gump_split_1, is your target separation correct? It looks like a line in java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/build.xml was out of place. I have fixed

Re: derby-split-2 (was: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-07-13 Thread Andrew McIntyre
Sorry for the delay here... On Jul 11, 2005, at 4:46 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 11 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project derby-split-2 (in module db-derby) failed

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-08-15 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On 8/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 11 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module db-derby success, but with warnings.

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-08-19 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Aug 19, 2005, at 5:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: derbyjarwithoutosgi: [jar] Building jar: /x1/gump/public/workspace/db-derby/jars/ insane/derby.jar [jar] Manifest is invalid: Manifest sections should start with a Name attribute and not Sealed BUILD FAILED

Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-10-25 Thread Andrew McIntyre
Just noticed that this is still failing. I am unable to reproduce the problem. Please see my previous mail concerning this problem. It would appear on the surface to be an issue with how Ant generates the manifest file in the derbyjarwithoutosgi target. Is there any way that I can get access to

Re: Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-10-26 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Oct 26, 2005, at 9:22 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: At least on vmgump there is an empty line in smf.mf between Bundle-Version in the main section and Sealed: true. This line makes the Sealed attribute the first one of a new section, which in turn makes the manifest invalid. That's what I

Re: Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-10-27 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Oct 27, 2005, at 7:19 AM, Leo Simons wrote: Hi andrew, Don't really understand the problem but I've put the db-derby dir from vmgump at http://vmgump.apache.org/derby-gump-snapshot.tgz please holler when we can remove it. I've got the file, so you can go ahead and remove it. Thanks

Re: Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-10-31 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Oct 29, 2005, at 6:31 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: I can't promise to find time to do more research No worries, I got it. :-) Most trivial idea: ${changenumber} expands to a value that ends with a new-line or a cariage-return new-line sequence. This guess is correct, and it turns out

Re: Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-10-31 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Oct 31, 2005, at 12:12 AM, Andrew McIntyre wrote: it turns out that it's a subversion problem, not an Ant or platform issue. The problem is that 'svnversion -n .' is returning a value that contains a newline when the directory whose version you are getting is 'exported,' when it should

Re: Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-11-02 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Nov 1, 2005, at 9:31 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Can you use a striplinebreaks filter reader in your loadfile task? Definitely. I hadn't thought of that. Checked in, should build tomorrow. Thanks again, Stefan! andrew

Failure in derby-split-1

2006-02-17 Thread Andrew McIntyre
Just noticed this has been failing for a while. The failure is here: compile_reference: [javac] Compiling 10 source files to /x1/gump/public/workspace/db-derby/classes [javac] /x1/gump/public/workspace/db-derby/java/engine/org/apache/derby/iapi/reference/SQLState.java:29: package

Re: Failure in derby-split-1

2006-02-17 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On 2/17/06, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't check the files myself, but it's hard to believe that 'svn up' has been failing for this long. What I'd check is if 'ant gump_split_1' works. It's likely that the missing file simply needs to be added to what that target builds.

Re: Failing project: derby-split-4

2007-03-15 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On 3/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: derby-split-4 = Dependees: 5 Affected : 6 Duration in state: 12 Gump metadata: sl4j.xml /snip What to do? Derby was recently changed to drop support for JDK 1.3, so the Derby build in Gump does not need to split around the

Re: derby build

2005-01-24 Thread Samuel Andrew McIntyre
On Jan 24, 2005, at 12:49 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Seems you are using a different address for sending than you've subscribed with. That does explain some of my problems. That will hopefully be fixed on my end going forward. :) By now you can rely on Gump running on JDK 1.4+. Does the build

Re: derby build

2005-01-26 Thread Samuel Andrew McIntyre
resending with the current account. *sigh* On Jan 25, 2005, at 2:04 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Ideally we'd build everything except the JDBC 2.0 stuff using Gump's default. And build the JDBC 2.0 stuff with JDK 1.3's rt.jar on the bootclasspath. The easiest way to achieve this would be to set the

Re: derby build

2005-02-03 Thread Samuel Andrew McIntyre
On Feb 2, 2005, at 2:43 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Anyway, the derby build has been split into seven pieces, three of which should be using JDK 1.3's rt.jar now. The derby build gets past the first split now. The errors in derby_split_2, like this one: [javac] 40. public class

Re: derby build

2005-02-04 Thread Samuel Andrew McIntyre
On Feb 4, 2005, at 7:53 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: The only solution I see is that we define a property in Gump pointing to JDK 1.3's rt.jar and you add this to the appropriate bootclasspath attributes. If you make this new property default to ${empty}, there shouldn't be any changes to your normal

Re: derby build

2005-02-07 Thread Samuel Andrew McIntyre
On Feb 7, 2005, at 12:14 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: I see. Setting includeruntime to false should help, doesn't it? If you mean the includeJavaRuntime and includeAntRuntime properties, then no. If I remember correctly, if bootclasspath is empty or null then the Jikes CompilerAdapter will add the

Re: derby build

2005-02-10 Thread Samuel Andrew McIntyre
On Feb 9, 2005, at 10:20 AM, Andrew McIntyre wrote: So close! One last problem: Ha! I spoke too soon. Now we're at the last split, but there's yet another problem. From build_db-derby_derby: verifysplit: noSplit: [echo] * SplitMessages not available * [echo] * Run all