+1
On 04/11/13 08:59, Jakob Frank wrote:
Hi all,
the Marmotta podling, whose goal is to provide an Open Platform for
Linked Data, entered incubation in December 2012. Since then, the
codebase has stabilized and two releases were published following ASF
policies and guidelines.
The community has
On 10/11/13 09:04, ant elder wrote:
How about simply changing the rules for Incubator releases so that
they don't require at least three binding votes, but instead make it
at least three votes only one of which must be binding. That would
mean there would still be the element of oversight that a
On 17/11/13 11:17, Upayavira wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 04:59 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
On 11/16/13 8:47 AM, "Upayavira" wrote:
Alex,
I'm not sure I see the difference between a release auditor and an IPMC
member. If someone is sufficiently clued up to audit a release, then
they're s
+1
On 14/12/13 14:42, Dave wrote:
+1
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Joseph Schaefer wrote:
+1
On Dec 13, 2013, at 11:31 PM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
So it begins =)
+1
Thanks for leading the effort, Marvin
- Henry
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
Greetings,
On 13/01/14 20:25, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
...What do people think about a project name "Hyena"? It's close enough, lives
in the savannah...
I think it's too close to http:/
On 13/01/14 21:57, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 13/01/14 20:25, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Steve Loughran
wrote:
...What do people think about a project name "Hyena"? It's close
enoug
will read that as Jena, the city in Thuringia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jena
-1
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 13/01/14 20:25, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Stev
On 05/04/14 16:19, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Rob,
If you developed the code during the time the ICLA and CCLA were in effect
(from February 2012) I don't see a need to file additional paperwork.
Craig
As a matter of good practice, when is it best to use the IP Clearance
process?
In this c
On 25/09/14 19:19, Suresh Marru wrote:
If you need a mentor, count me in.
I actively contribute to Apache Airavata, and will be happy to bring our
experiences from a similar journey. Infact Ross queried on airavata lists few
years ago about potential taverna move to airavata/apache(Ross mentio
added you to the the mentor list on the
proposal.
Andy
On 9/26/14, 10:18 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 25/09/14 19:19, Suresh Marru wrote:
If you need a mentor, count me in.
I actively contribute to Apache Airavata, and will be happy to bring
our experiences from a similar journey. In
Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg45241.html
I would like to call a Vote for accepting Taverna as a new incubator
project.
The proposal is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TavernaProposal
Vote is open
ncluding responsibilities for
contributing to and supporting
Taverna. http://www.mygrid.org.uk/about-us/people/core-mygrid-team/.
Dmitriy Repchevsky is employed by the Barcelona Supercomputing Center,
including responsibilities for contributing to Taverna. Steffen Möller is
employed by University of Lüb
[ ] +1 accept Taverna in the Incubator
[ ] ±0
[ ] -1 because...
+1 (binding)
Andy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache
yes - s/Lens/Taverna/
(sigh)
On 16/10/14 18:27, jan i wrote:
+1 binding (assuming its Taverna, and there has been a simple copy/paste
error).
have fun.
jan I.
On 16 October 2014 18:48, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
+1 - binding
I assume that you mean Taverna instead of Lens.
Regards,
Alan
To: general@incubator.apache.org
This VOTE passes with 13 +1 binding votes
Suresh Marru
Alan D. Cabrera
jan I
Ralph Goers
Bertrand Delacretaz
Andy Seaborne
Suresh Srinivas
Chris Mattmann
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Jake Farrel
Leif Hedstrom
Jean-Louis Monteiro
Roman Shaposhnik
and no 0's or
On 27/10/14 14:15, Marvin wrote:
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 November 2014, 10:30 am PST.
On 17/11/12 09:01, Sergio Fernández wrote:
Hi Roy,
we were aware of the possible conflict/confusion with the name; but
since the Linda model is quite old, not really spread nowadays and
completely far away of the Linked Data topic, personally I can't see a
really big issue here. But of course th
On 19/11/12 11:20, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
Hi all,
we have had a brainstorming round and came up with the suggestion "Apache
Marmotta" as a new name. We looked a bit and the name seems not to be taken yet, so
there would probably no legal issues with the name.
Why "Marmotta"? It is Italian
On 20/11/12 10:05, Sergio Fernández wrote:
Hi,
we were internally discussing that the project would benefit a lot from
having a mentor outside of the core Semantic Web community. Then he/she
could help us to address those issues of which are not fully aware when
you work so close in a topic. For
A quick update on the Marmotta proposal.
Thanks everyone for the comments. The proposal should reflect the
discussions.
One of the mentors is not yet formally a member of IPMC so we're waiting
until we have three formal mentors before calling the proposal vote.
(and still, ideally, looking
ch
Forschungsgesellschaft mbH.
== Sponsors
= Champion
Andy Seaborne (andy at apache dot org)
= Nominated Mentors
Fabian Christ (fchrist at apache dot org)
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya (nandana at apache dot org)
Andy Seaborne (andy at apache dot org)
= Sponsorin
+1 (binding)
On 29/11/12 12:00, Fabian Christ wrote:
+1 (unbinding since I am not yet an IPMC member)
2012/11/29 Ross Gardler
+1 (binding)
On 29 November 2012 11:28, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Hi there,
Following the discussion thread, here is the formal vote on the Marmotta
proposal
On 29/11/12 14:53, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
... Would you also add the three or more active PMC members requirement? What
constitutes active?...
IMO the bare minimum is being able to find three PMC members to vote
on things when needed.
ian Christ
Andy Seaborne *
Alan Cabera *
Bertrand Delacretaz *
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya *
Dave Fisher *
Alexei Fedotov
Ted Dunning *
Chris Mattman *
Ralph Goers *
Jakob Homan *
Andreas Kuckartz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsub
On 29/11/12 20:51, Peter Ansell wrote:
On 29 November 2012 21:28, Andy Seaborne wrote:
== Relationships with Other Apache Projects
Although current RDF/SPARQL support in LMF is build on top of OpenRDF Sesame
API, Marmotta is closely related to many Apache projects, such as Stanbol,
Jena and
On 20/12/12 05:33, Joe Schaefer wrote:
All webpages we host are works in progress subject to change when
better consensus emerges. Please do not affix any labels to the
pages describing them as drafts as that only serves to discourage
others from working on them. Normative policy documents are
On 13/01/13 12:45, Benson Margulies wrote:
...
3. Most of the reviewing in this area is done by sebb. We're lucky to
have him paying attention to this at all, because it sure seems
sometimes as if no one else does.
Adding all of this up, I've got a very modest proposal. Let's create a
checklist,
On 25/03/13 08:41, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Upayavira wrote:
Now, you might argue that mentoring is a lot more than voting, but we
could create another bottleneck in getting release votes through,
requiring votes from incubator PMC members who are not particularly
foc
On 17/07/13 06:49, Ross Gardler wrote:
Ross Gardler Marmotta
Looks good. Releases made, Committers brought in. Mentors appear to be
watching. Recommend mentors consider graduation sooner rather than later.
The mentors have. The podling is reluctant to leave the nest :-)
(This mentor is
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
On 11/24/2010 3:58 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
But this is like if you are working in an office in front of a collegue :
most of the time, you don't chit-chat, you work. And
On 03/12/10 13:38, Dave wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I'm working with the Jena team to get everything ready on their side.
>
> Thanks for the help on the ASF side.
Where are we on ICLAs and user ID preferences?
(Perhaps we should move further discussion to
On 02/08/11 11:24, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2011-08-02, Henri Yandell wrote:
As can be seen elsewhere, I'm on a self-given mission to clean up the
history of podlings by getting them to sign off on the following
checklist item:
"Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to t
On 04/09/11 11:02, Michele Mostarda wrote:
Hi Nick,
On 4 September 2011 10:32, Nick Kew wrote:
On 3 Sep 2011, at 16:01, Davide Palmisano wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Any23Proposal
Hmmm. Could've done with something like that a decade or so ago.
It's been a while since I wor
Accept Any23 into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding)
Andy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 08/11/10 18:32, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
To make the commons discussion more concrete I would suggest the
following items for the commons:
- an IRI library
- some code to do with vocabularies.
- connecting to a URL and doing semweb aware content negotiation (this
is typically done badly)
(Act
On 08/11/10 17:30, Ian Dickinson wrote:
Hi Donald,
On 08/11/10 17:01, Donald Whytock wrote:
Perhaps db.apache.org would be a better example? Should there be a
semantic.apache.org?
I looked around in db.apache.org and I couldn't see anything that said
what the goals of that project are, sepa
I haven't understood yet the relationship of Stanbol and Clerezza to be
able to say anything about how a commons area between those two systems
might work. In terms of direct dependencies, does Stanbol just directly
depend on Clerezza and only indirectly on Sesame, Jena rdf2go and the
OWLAPI t
On 09/11/10 16:22, Florent Guillaume wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Andy Seaborne
wrote:
Jeremy identified the IRI library as a potential contribution to a commons
area. It is free-standing, and does not use or call any Jena RDF code - it
depends only on ICU4J (and JUnit + Jflex in
On 09/11/10 16:59, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
I could be accused of having gone overboard ...
yes ... :-)
Having changed job and looking at this from a different perspective I am
less convinced by the pickiness.
At least leave the picky mode there, please. It's been very helpful in
working w
On 10/11/10 23:28, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
- The core API for (mutable) graphs in:
http://incubator.apache.org/clerezza/mvn-site/org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core/apidocs/index.html
http://incubator.apache.org/clerezza/mvn-site/org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core/apidocs/org/apache/clerezza/rdf/core/Triple
On 12/11/10 08:40, Nick Kew wrote:
On 8 Nov 2010, at 23:36, Ross Gardler wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to accept
Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the proposal is
copied here for your convenience and can be found a
On 13/11/10 02:23, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
On 11/12/2010 6:05 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
CyberNeko and TagSoup both have acceptable licenses. Some people
prefer TagSoup because it does not require Xerces.
Have you read http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html?
No I hadn't. That is very usef
On 13/11/10 13:32, Ross Gardler wrote:
All,
Resolving IP issues are a part of the incubation process not the acceptance
process
It is not necessary to delay entry into the incubator because some o these
issues need to be satisfactorily resolved. The Jena developers are aware of
this and ha
Please vote on releasing the following as
Apache Jena version 2.7.0-incubating
This will be the first incubator release for Jena at Apache.
== Overview
Jena is a Java framework for building Semantic Web applications. Jena
provides a collection of tools and Java libraries to help to develop
On 21/12/11 02:01, Benson Margulies wrote:
+1
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
*bump*. We have 2 +1s from mentors already, so at a minimum we need
just one more binding vote to do this release. Anyone have time to do
the review?
thanks!
Leo
The two mentor votes cast on j
Please vote on releasing the following as
Apache Jena version 2.7.0-incubating
This will be the first incubator release for Jena at Apache.
== Overview
Jena is a Java framework for building Semantic Web applications. Jena
provides a collection of tools and Java libraries to help to develop
>> Please vote on this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release of Apache Jena 2.7.0-incubating
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>
>> This vote will be open until:
>> Thursday 22/December 23:59 UTC
>> (72 hours from the same hour tonight).
We have 3 +1 from IPMC, and no -1's
Binding
On 30/01/12 17:32, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Jena
When can I vote on your graduation?
Jena's report is already signed off on the wiki: [*]
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
"The project is discussing graduation.
Plan:
* Graduation preparation
(checking, drafting the scope/ch
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote
for this release.
== Overview
This will be the second incubator release for by Jena; it's the first
Apache release for the TDB module.
Jena is compos
Hi there,
We're short for votes for this release. Is there anything the podling
can do, such as co-ordinate different checking undertaken, to help IPMC
to vote on this release?
Andy
On 08/02/12 13:03, Andy Seaborne wrote:
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB
Hi sebb,
Thanks very much for the time and feedback - we'll be back when we've
fixed these problems.
Andy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h..
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote
for this release.
== Major changes since RC-2
+ Distribution has it's own content for NOTICE/LICENSE files which
rolls up information for the redistri
On 12/02/12 12:22, sebb wrote:
... lots of useful comments ...
Hi sebb,
We have just posted a vote on an RC-4 - this reply is to some of the
specific points you raised:
>> Please vote on this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release of Apache Jena, module TDB 0.9.0-incubating
>> [ ] -1
On 23/02/12 18:32, sebb wrote:
Hi sebb,
Thanks for the review,
== Staging repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-001/
This contains zip and tar.gz binary and source archives, which should
be deleted as they are not useful to Maven.
There are two additio
We distribute through maven but also many of our users are not experienced
developers but students, including ones new to java.
To make it as easy as possible for this category of user, we ship a
distribution which is the collection of jars needed for use without a
maven/ivy infrastructure.
T
On 24/02/12 14:04, sebb wrote:
The directory structures align:
/download/jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating
/source-release/jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating
I see the following files (amongst others) in the RC area
http://people.apache.org/~andy/dist-jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating-RC-4/
KEYS
download/apache-jena-
sebb,
What I'm trying to get to at the moment is something that enables a
release of TDB and we can apply to next module.
jena is a number of modules, we have released 3 (5 actually - 2 are the
parent POM and the distribution maker for the core) already; TDB is the
sixth, and there are 3 mor
`-- source-release
`-- jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating
What's the point of the subdirectory?
because there are other modules with their own source-release artifact. The
TDB release items will be merged into the existing directory.
So why don't you do the same for the download directory?
Th
On 24/02/12 16:56, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Mark Struberg wrote on Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 09:17:57 +:
PS: txs to Daniel Shahaf for pointing me at the current docs
I didn't :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incub
Currently, this vote has 2 +1 and some comments. This release vote
isn't going to get the necessary 3 +1's so is being closed. We'll be
back with another RC.
Andy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubat
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote
for this release.
--
Main changes from RC-4:
+ Added license to scripts, and XML files.
small test files don't have a license; test manif
On 08/03/12 09:14, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Thank you ant.
We still need 2 more votes, right?
We need one more IPMC vote.
We have Benson on the project vote thread on jena-dev@i and ant from
general@i.
Please - one more IPMC +1!
Andy
---
On 04/03/12 22:19, Andy Seaborne wrote:
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote
for this release.
--
...
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1
Hi,
Here is a vote on a release for Jena Fuseki module, 0.2.1-incubating.
This RC-2 of this release.
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
This vote will be open until:
Wednesday 21/March 23:59 UTC
The vote for Jena Fuseki 0.2.1-incubating passes with 3 +1 IPMC votes.
+1's: IPMC:
* Leo Simons
* Benson Margulies
* Mark Struberg
as well as 3 +1's from PPMC members on the jena-dev list [1]
0's
-1's
Thanks everybody, I'll go push some buttons,
Andy
[1]
http://mail-archives.ap
ersons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Jena Project:
* Andy Seaborne (andy)
* Benson Marguilies (bimargulies)
* Chris Dollin (chrisdollin)
* Damian Steer (damian)
Result for the graduation vote for Apache Jena on general@i.a.o:
+1:
Bertrand Delacretaz
Benson Margulies
Chris Mattmann
Alan Cabrera
Andreas Kuckartz (non-binding)
Leo Simons
Jukka Zitting
Matthew Franklin
0:
None
-1:
None
so we're delighted to announce that the vote has succeeded.
Thanks ev
P.S. Jena looks fairly good, although missing (TM) after the first use
of name, and needs to tweak homepage text a little. I like their logo!
Thanks for that - what are those tweaks (either email or JIRA) and we'll
get them fixed.
Andy
On 22/04/12 12:55, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Ready to graduate: Jena, Lucene.NET, NPanday, OpenNLP
Jena graduation has been approved by the board.
We need to do the graduation process now ...
Andy
-
To unsubscribe, e-
Seeing INFRA-4767 ...
Need to update the website
1) List of VPs
Also, if a VP position changes, please update the web-site file at:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/index.html
using the CMS application, or update:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/foundation/
sebb - thanks for the pointers.
Andy
On 09/05/12 01:33, sebb wrote:
On 8 May 2012 23:22, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Seeing INFRA-4767 ...
Need to update the website
1) List of VPs
Also, if a VP position changes, please update the web-site file at:
http://www.apache.org/foundation
On 08/08/12 23:16, Jukka Zitting wrote:
If the efforts to grow or reactivate the community fail, would it be a
good idea to seek to join forces with some related projects like
Stanbol, Any23 or UIMA? Or do you feel that there are still enough
active people to allow the project to function as a st
On 11/08/12 12:33, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 08/08/12 23:16, Jukka Zitting wrote:
If the efforts to grow or reactivate the community fail, would it be a
good idea to seek to join forces with some related projects like
Stanbol, Any23 or
On 16/08/12 14:41, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Folks,
We have already called and completed a community VOTE with the Any23
community and the Tika PMC and they have positively recommended Any23's
graduation from the Incubator.
VOTE: http://s.apache.org/fU
RESULT: http://s.apache.org/VAl
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's
purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with
the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for
distribution at no charge
Hi,
Jena graduated 2012 with old namespaces under com.hp.hpl.jena, and some
under org.openjena, with an intention to change at the first major
release update. As new packages came along, they went into
org.apache.jena but the user facing packages remained where they were.
We released Jena 3
There are 2 mentors votes for this release.
Could we get a third please, or the assistence to produce a better release?
Andy
On 05/08/15 12:11, Ian Dunlop wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
The Apache Taverna Incubator PPMC has voted +5 to release
Apache T
+1 (binding)
On 14/09/15 16:17, Adam Fuchs wrote:
Thanks again for the healthy discussion on Rya. With that, I would like to
call a VOTE for accepting Rya as a new incubator project.
The proposal text is included below, and is posted on the wiki here:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RyaPropos
On 14/09/15 17:26, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Hello,
It appears that VOTEing in general@ is inefficient and biased. An Apache member will see a VOTE on
the list and can choose whether to participate in that VOTE or not. I believe there are problems
with this algorithm. The first has to do with eff
On 14/10/15 16:21, Ross Gardler wrote:
Further to Sam's suggestion and observations below see
Suggestion 0.1.8 at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorIssues2013#Suggestions
(Summary: Champion => PPMC chair)
I agree with the comments that champion-as-chair is a negative to the
communit
Hi all,
I'm one of the "semi-active mentors" of Taverna. In my case, I have a
new $job, which is related to some Apache communities but not Taverna.
A new job is a busy time so I'm really not able to properly support the
podling at the moment. I wish I could but I also have to be realistic.
On 07/06/16 02:40, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Taverna
Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
aware of?
ASF guidance on US export ECCN cryptography registration
https://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html
has not yet been updated for the 2010
+1 (binding)
Andy
On 28/06/16 15:28, John D. Ament wrote:
All,
Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to provide clear feedback to
the infra team on how to implement going forward.
Typically, the addresses $podling.apache.org and $
podling.incubator.apache.org work, and have wor
On 25/08/16 07:34, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> I think you may be seeing signs of self-throttling. Basically if the
> new proposal
> comes in and there's nobody interested in mentoring it -- well the project
> won't
> go in.
Well, that just 1% of the work. Every body could easily volunteer for
Done
On 28/06/17 10:26, Henri Yandell wrote:
Could a PMC Chair type person grant access to Jenkins for Ly please (login
lxn2)?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins#Jenkins-HowdoIgetanaccount
I gave it a shot, but I don't believe I have the correct permissions.
Thank you,
On 03/08/17 05:13, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:13 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:54 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
Hi all,
In regards to the recently incubated project - Gobblin, we were wondering
a
On 03/08/17 15:51, Julian Hyde wrote:
It rarely comes down to the IPMC or the Board dictating how a project names its
java classes (does anyone recall an instance?), so it’s mainly the project’s
discretion. In my opinion, where the project is on its adoption curve is an
important considerati
xpect that their future users outnumber current users
are
highly encouraged to rename packages
3) Other projects are not required to rename packages and backward
compatibility is sufficient reason to not rename packages.
Or should #2 also be a MUST?
-Alex
On 8/3/17, 8:34 AM, "Andy Seabor
On 04/08/17 13:09, Shane Curcuru wrote:
John D. Ament wrote on 8/4/17 7:59 AM:
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 7:17 AM Shane Curcuru wrote:
...snip...
- Other reverse domain names *really* should change to org.apache;
otherwise it's just confusing.
Agreed. The one caveat to all this is the imple
bcc: dev@taverna
+1 (binding)
Source downloaded,built (java8 - fails on java10; the podling is aware
of this) and tests pass.
Checksum and sigs verified
DISCLIAMER, LICENSE and NOTICE present.
---
The POM parent (separate release) includes other maven repos
https://dl.bintray.com/
http
On 02/01/15 16:40, David Nalley wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
Git allows you to commit as "whoever you want" - e.g. like in SMTP
email, the headers are decided by the sender. SVN on the other hand
will show the authenticated user in the commit log. So - speak
On 08/01/15 16:48, Chip Childers wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:18:59PM -0800, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Retiring the role of Champion sounds like an idea whose time has come. We
gave the Champion additional oversight responsibilities a while back -- but
how many times since then has having tha
Looks good but there is one part that wasn't clear to me.
In this proposal, the TinkerPop2 repos appear in the initial source
listing as well, but are not in the submission plan.
Is TinkerPop2 also part of the proposal? Is there is risk in it being a
burden on the project? Conversly, if it is
On 11/02/15 08:14, Sergio Fernández wrote:
On 10/02/15 21:31, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
If Commons is OK with this, I imagine this is a fine plan -- good
enough for
entering incubation.
I also think it would be OK for the project to decide it wants to
become a
TLP. Whether the project joins Commo
be shunted onto existing Commons mailing list like d...@commons.apache.org
and
comm...@commons.apache.org?
* Sergio Fernández (wikier dot apache dot org)
* Andy Seaborne (andy dot apache dot org)
* Peter Ansell (ansell dot apache dot org)
* Stian Soiland-Reyes (stain at apache dot org)
* Reto
On 22/02/15 19:52, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
Hi Folks,
I've read through the commentary on the recent [DISCUSS] thread for Commons
RDF [0].
It is not clear to me what the outcome was really... can anyone else
provide a fresh insight as to where this proposal is going and what is
required to pro
John,
Thank you very much for the offer of mentoring - I've added you to the list.
And I've renamed the proposal as "CommonRDFProposal" as that seems to be
naming style on the wiki.
Andy
On 22/02/15 20:56, John D. Ament wrote:
Lewis,
It looks like there were a few things called out
On 23/02/15 10:32, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hello,
2015-02-22 21:56 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament :
Lewis,
It looks like there were a few things called out.
- Identify a champion (looks like you did already)
- Solicit support from mentors.
It looks like those are the only two open issues. Benedikt
On 27/02/15 19:19, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
Hi general@,
Over the last while a number of individuals have been putting together a
proposal and gathering interest in proposing Commons RDF for acceptance
into the Apache Incubator. Having worked our way through the Incubator
documentation checkl
Signing up to Apache list means the user is making an explicit act of
joining a place where code (or pointers to code) sent is granted to Apache.
Implicit subscription muddies the waters for contributions.
Andy
On 26/03/15 21:55, Ted Dunning wrote:
your loop is a fine solution. Just
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
