Code import for Apache Accumulo

Hi, Over at Apache Accumulo, we just got a nice bit of code that integrates the R programming language (via RStudio) with Accumulo. This was done completely by the community (non-committers) and we're trying to figure out what's best for it and where it can live. The general consensus for us is

Re: Code import for Apache Accumulo

through IP Clearance. http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ If you have questions or need help with that process, don't hesitate to ask. --David On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Josh Elser els...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Over at Apache Accumulo, we just got a nice bit of code

Re: Hoya Proposal

I wanted to weigh in on some of Steve's thoughts, I'm actually really excited about being able to leverage Hoya inside of Accumulo itself. We presently have a few system tests that rely on manual set up, which can be frustrating to deal with on a beefy boxes (running multiple Accumulo procs on a

[VOTE] Release Apache Slider 0.60.0 incubating

Hi, The Apache Slider project has voted to release 0.60.0-incubating. The team voted to release these artifacts with 6 +1's and nothing else. 2 of the 6 votes were from IPMC members. Vote thread: http://s.apache.org/a6O Result: http://s.apache.org/e3C Staged artifacts:

Re: [PROPOSAL] NiFi for Incubation

Very exciting stuff! Not presently on IPMC, but if you'd have me, I'd be happy to volunteer as a mentor. If so, I'll submit an application to join the IPMC and we can go from there. - Josh Joe Witt wrote: Hello, I would like to propose NiFi as an Apache Incubator Project. In addition to

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Slider 0.60.0 incubating

the time to look at the release. - Josh Josh Elser wrote: Hi, The Apache Slider project has voted to release 0.60.0-incubating. The team voted to release these artifacts with 6 +1's and nothing else. 2 of the 6 votes were from IPMC members. Vote thread: http://s.apache.org/a6O Result: http

Re: [PROPOSAL] NiFi for Incubation

I would tend to disagree with your assertion about Accumulo, but this is neither the time nor the place to discuss Accumulo's strengths and weaknesses. I'll make the assumption that request to enter incubation is a strong intent to grow outside of the project's current home. +1

Re: [PROPOSAL] NiFi for Incubation

Thanks for the clarification -- that wasn't how it came across to me. Andrew Purtell wrote: I didn't make an assertion *about* Accumulo, what I said exactly was: that Accumulo may or may not suffer from bifurcation is debatable I assert there are two sides to that argument (I've

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Slider 0.70.0-incubating

Steve Loughran wrote: As gour said, those binaries are just a bit of hadoop-2.6 needed to try to get slider-windows on jenkins to work Given that for other issues with getting that build up related to the FS, I can just cull these and if/when I get back to getting that build working (which

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Slider 0.81.1-incubating

Fwd'ing from dev@slider. +1 (binding) Jon Maron wrote: Hello, This is a call for a vote for releasing Apache Slider 0.81.1-incubating. This is a source release. Summary of fixes: http://s.apache.org/sgG Release Notes: http://s.apache.org/ZZP Vote thread: http://s.apache.org/Ejv Results:

Karma for mentor-signoff on wiki

Can someone grant me the necessary karma to add my [x] on November's report, please? username: JoshElser Thanks! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Karma for mentor-signoff on wiki

Thanks, Marvin! Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Josh Elser<els...@apache.org> wrote: Can someone grant me the necessary karma to add my [x] on November's report, please? username: JoshElser Done. Marvin Hu

Re: [DISCUSS] Rya Incubator Proposal

As specified in the proposal, I'm happy to volunteer as a mentor (currently a member, haven't officially requested to join IPMC). === Inexperience with Open Source === The initial committers have various degrees of experience with open source projects - from very new to experienced. This

Re: [VOTE] Accept Rya into the Apache Incubator

= Sponsors == === Champion === * Adam Fuchs, ASF Member, afuchs at apache dot org === Nominated Mentors === * Josh Elser josh dot elser at gmail dot com * Edward J. Yoon edwardyoon at apache dot org * Sean Busbey busbey at cloudera dot com We are seeking additional mentors === Sponsor

Re: Impala commit policy

Tom White wrote: The vote to accept Impala into the incubator has passed (http://s.apache.org/u6r), however there are still some concerns about CTR/RTC. My main takeaways from the CTR/RTC thread are that it's not a binary choice, and that it's entirely reasonable that different communities have

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

Greg Stein wrote: RTC versus CTR is clearly a religious debate. There are a large number of > successful and vibrant Apache communities using each paradigm. I don't > "Apache communities" is (IMO) a very important point here. I believe that Apache communities understand the nuances of peer

Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.90.2-incubating

Justin Mclean wrote: Year is incorrect in the NOTICE file so you might want to fix that for the next release. I also noticed that some of the bundled (Apache licensed) kazoo files don’t have correct license headers. Perhaps you could fix that upstream? You could get them to add a NOTICE

Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.90.2-incubating

Ok, thanks for the insight, Justin! I'll open up an issue to fix these in the next release. Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Is this something we can fix on the next release, or do we need to tank this RC? I'm not sure how critically to apply the policy since these are generated code. I saw

Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.90.2-incubating

Daniel Gruno wrote: License count as follows: Apache License/2.0: 1196 BSD 3-Clause License: 2 License missing: 101 (see below) Python License/2.0: 2 Seehttp://compliance.rocks/result.html?1152a2a9 for a list of minor nits (missing some license headers in a bunch of python scripts). Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.90.2-incubating

Forwarding my +1 (binding) from the dev@slider vote. Steve Loughran wrote: Hello, This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.90.2-incubating. This release candidate, 0.90.2-incubating-RC1 has successfully passed a vote for a release on the slider developer mailing

Re: Lack of karma to manage LDAP groups as a mentor impediment

Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Josh Elser<els...@apache.org> wrote: I'm a little frustrated as this has just hit me across three different podlings in the past two days. Because I'm not a PMC chair, I don't have the ability to actually modify LDAP groups to

Lack of karma to manage LDAP groups as a mentor impediment

Hi all, I'm a little frustrated as this has just hit me across three different podlings in the past two days. Because I'm not a PMC chair, I don't have the ability to actually modify LDAP groups to grant the necessary karma to podling members to commit, access Jenkins, etc (e.g.

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck! Sijie Guo wrote: Hello All, Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator. [] +1 Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator [] +0 Abstain. [] -1 Do not accept DistributedLog into the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck! James Bognar wrote: Hi all, It looks like the discussion thread has died down so I am now calling a vote on accepting Juneau into the Apache Incubator. For those who are interested the DISCUSS thread can be found at

[VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating

Hi folks, This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating. This release candidate, 0.91.0-incubating-RC0, has successfully passed a vote for a release on the Apache Slider developer mailing list. Vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating

Thanks for taking a close look as always, Justin! I didn't think that one through -- "it's just used for testing, the .war is fine". I appreciate you catching it. I'll try to find a way to build that on the fly for the tests to use instead leaving it static in the source-release. Justin

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating

Canceling the vote due to the .war containing other .jars that Justin found. Josh Elser wrote: Hi folks, This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating. This release candidate, 0.91.0-incubating-RC0, has successfully passed a vote for a release

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator

gt; > Pirk requests use of Git for source control (git://git.apache.org/pirk.git > ). > We request a writeable Git repo for Pirk with mirroring to be setup to > Github through INFRA. > > Issue Tracking > > JIRA Pirk (PIRK) > > Initial Committers > > Tracy Brown , CLA submitted > > Christopher Harris , CLA submitted > > Walter Ray-Dulaney , CLA submitted > > Jacob Wilder , CLA submitted > > Ellison Anne Williams , CLA confirmed > > Joe Witt , CLA confirmed > > Sponsors > > Champion > > Billie Rinaldi , IPMC Member > > Nominated Mentors > > Billie Rinaldi , IPMC Member > > Joe Witt , IPMC Member > > Josh Elser , IPMC Member > > Suneel Marthi , IPMC Member > > Tim Ellison , Apache Member > > Sponsoring Entity > > We request the Apache Incubator to sponsor this project. >

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

+1 This is awesome, Justin. Thanks for making the time to put this together. Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, At the last ApacheCon I was discussing with Marvin about some of the issues around assembling license and notice files. One of the ideas we come up with was to have some worked examples. So

Re: Request for advice on code donation

Apache License long before this > > individual contributed. So, IMO, if you are convinced this individual > and > > his employer knew his contributions were placed under the Apache License > > you could gamble and accept his contributions. If you get an objection > > later, you

Re: Request for advice on code donation

t it moved to NOTICE. And if this individual or his employer somehow tries to argue that they did not intend to allow the contributions to be under ALv2 in the first place, or doesn't want the ASF to be the new home for this code, which seems unlikely. HTH, -Alex On 1/15/16, 5:21 AM, "Josh

[IP CLEARANCE] Apache Slider -- "KOYA" grant

All, Please review the following IP clearance form to bring in the "KOYA" project into the Apache Slider podling. http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/slider-koya.html This sign-off is subject to lazy consensus and is open until 2016-01-19 0800 GMT. Please note the following recent

Request for advice on code donation

Hi all, (with my podling member hat on) We have a bit of a problem over in Slider with a code donation. Full details can be found at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLIDER-977 In short, an app-package (a modular chunk of code that Slider runs on Apache Hadoop's YARN ) for Kafka was

Re: Request for advice on code donation

Ugh, sorry to bring this back again. Apparently my mind was playing tricks on me. We don't have an ICLA from jbnote either. I incorrectly thought I saw him listed at http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html. Josh Elser wrote: Well then, that's an easy resolution :) Thanks, Ross

Re: Request for advice on code donation

ibuted. So, IMO, if you are convinced this individual and his employer knew his contributions were placed under the Apache License you could gamble and accept his contributions. If you get an objection later, you can delete and re-implement the contributions. My 2 cents, -Alex On 1/14/16, 10:45 AM,

Re: Request for advice on code donation

Well then, that's an easy resolution :) Thanks, Ross (and everyone else). I'll just ignore the lack of CCLA and make note of this. Ross Gardler wrote: CCLA is optional for ASF -Original Message- From: Josh Elser [mailto:josh.el...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 12:34 PM

Re: Request for advice on code donation

dividual and his employer knew his contributions were placed under the Apache License you could gamble and accept his contributions. If you get an objection later, you can delete and re-implement the contributions. My 2 cents, -Alex On 1/14/16, 10:45 AM, "Josh Elser"<els...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating rc1

Yeah, I'll have to take another look. I *think* they're good, but who knows what else I haven't noticed :) Will make a note to do before our next release. Thanks again, Justin. Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, - You're publishing a nexus repo, I would expect that you're also expecting people to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating rc1

Will do, John. Thanks for the vote. John D. Ament wrote: +1. A couple of notes: - Please clean out old dists from your dist folder - You're publishing a nexus repo, I would expect that you're also expecting people to review the binary release. John On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:58 PM Josh

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

Has the podling gone through the PODLINGNAMESEARCH process yet? Seems like that would come up in the shakedown, then -- just mentioning it because you came across it now, Roman? On Feb 26, 2016 5:33 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with

[RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Slider -- "KOYA" grant

This passes per lazy-consesus. Thanks, all. Josh Elser wrote: All, Please review the following IP clearance form to bring in the "KOYA" project into the Apache Slider podling. http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/slider-koya.html This sign-off is subject to lazy consensus a

Re: Request for advice on code donation

or doesn't want the ASF to be the new home for this code, which seems unlikely. HTH, -Alex On 1/15/16, 5:21 AM, "Josh Elser"<josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks, Greg. I thought the whole point of this part of the process was that we could assign the copyright from the origin

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

+1 Glad to see this hit incubator. Feel free to add me as a mentor if you'd like another. Daniel Dai wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Omid as an Apache Incubator project: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OmidProposal I've posted posted the text of the proposal below: Thanks, Daniel =

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Daniel Dai wrote: Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as a new Incubator project. [ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Incubator [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Omid [ ] -1 Do not accept Omid because ... The vote will be open for the next 72 hours.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gossip into the Apache Incubator

n Post * P. Taylor Goetz - Hortonworks * Gary Dusbabek - Silicon Valley Data Science * Dorian Ellerbe - Dstillery * Sathish Dhinakaran - Dstillery * Sean Busbey - Cloudera * Josh Elser - Hortonworks = Additional Interested Contributors = Those interested in getting involved with the pr

Re: [PROPOSAL] Fluo

is present) == Initial Committers == * Keith Turner (kturner at apache dot org) * Mike Walch (mike.walch at ptech-llc dot com) * Corey Nolet (cjnolet at apache dot org) * Christopher Tubbs (ctubbsii at apache dot org) * Josh Elser (elserj at apache dot org) == Affiliations == * Keith

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fluo into the Apache Incubator

olet at apache dot org) Christopher Tubbs (ctubbsii at apache dot org) Josh Elser (elserj at apache dot org) Affiliations Keith Turner (Peterson Technologies, ASF Member, Accumulo PMC, Gora PMC) Mike Walch (Peterson Technologies) Corey Nolet (Tetra Concepts LLC, Accumulo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fluo parent POM 1 and Build Resources 1.0.0

Forwarding my (binding) +1 from the PPMC vote. Christopher wrote: IPMC, Please consider the following candidates for Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating and Fluo Build Resources 1.0.0-incubating. There are two artifacts, which we are releasing together. They do not contain Fluo itself, but are

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - August 2016

Makes sense to me. I should be able to reach one of the mentors in private channels (which I'll do in a moment), but am OK with having Slider report next month (even one mentor sign-off isn't ideal, obviously). John D. Ament wrote: Thanks Eric. We're still missing sign off on Slider. Billie

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - August 2016

Devaraj has signed off. Josh Elser wrote: Makes sense to me. I should be able to reach one of the mentors in private channels (which I'll do in a moment), but am OK with having Slider report next month (even one mentor sign-off isn't ideal, obviously). John D. Ament wrote: Thanks Eric. We're

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.9.RC2 as 0.9

+1 (binding) * Verified SHA1 and sig * DISCLAIMER present * LICENSE and NOTICE look good after glance through source release * Didn't find anything to explicitly build or any automated tests to run (maybe I missed them?) * Verified commit ID in repo Things to fix for your next release (I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.9.RC2 as 0.9

Daniel Gruno wrote: On 07/17/2016 06:03 PM, Josh Elser wrote: +1 (binding) Yay! * Verified SHA1 and sig * DISCLAIMER present * LICENSE and NOTICE look good after glance through source release * Didn't find anything to explicitly build or any automated tests to run (maybe I missed them

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.0 (incubating) - rc1

Taking a look myself. Because Git tag names are not immutable (you could overwrite the tag at any time), please use the commit's SHA1 instead of the tag name alone in the future. For reference, at the time which I'm checking, ranger-0.6.0-rc1 points to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.0 (incubating) - rc1

Hi, +1 (binding) with reservations. * xsums/sigs match * KEYS contains necessary sig * DISCLAIMER present * Verified (lack of) NOTICE files for bundled ASLv2 code for all but one case. See next section for the issue. * Was able to build and run tests * Ran rat-check Now, all of the below

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating rc1

This vote passes 4 binding +1's. Thanks again John and Justin! I'll go ahead and promote the artifacts. SLIDER-1149 was filed to dbl-check L in the jars before the next release. Josh Elser wrote: Hi folks, This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck! Jan van Doorn wrote: Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator. [] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator [] +0 Abstain. [] -1 Do not accept Traffic Control into the Apache

Re: Warning from d...@juneau.incubator.apache.org

I believe I saw an explanation elsewhere that it might be gmail actively denying some messages because it thinks they are spam. I get a few bounces now and again across various lists, but definitely not such a list that you have below. Have you looked at any of the messages to see if they

On Fluo (was Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating (rc2))

Mentor here catching up on things here after being offline for a week... Wow. This rather blew up! A couple of things I wanted to say, in addition to an ACK that this mentor is paying attention (as much as the email backlog is caught up, anyways). - I think there is a very fair point brought

Re: On Fluo (was Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating (rc2))

John D. Ament wrote: On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:57 PM Josh Elser<els...@apache.org> wrote: - I think there is a very fair point brought up by Craig/Justin/John at the gray line between "Apache Fluo" and "fluo.io". However, I will say that I do *not* think this is r

Re: On Fluo (was Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating (rc2))

Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<els...@apache.org> wrote: - I think there is a very fair point brought up by Craig/Justin/John at the gray line between "Apache Fluo" and "fluo.io". However, I will say that I do *not* think this is r

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Slider 0.91.0-incubating

The Apache Slider team is proud to announce Apache Slider incubation release version 0.91.0-incubating. Apache Slider (incubating) is a YARN application which deploys existing distributed applications on YARN, monitors them, and makes them larger or smaller as desired - even while the

Re: Mailing list creation (DistributedLog)

I had to hop over to Hipchat last week to poke infra about lists for Pirk. Thankfully, Daniel made some time and knocked it out for me shortly after asking. Not sure if there is a reason for the delay, but a light-hand will probably help sort it out :) John D. Ament wrote: Sounds like a

Re: Fwd: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating RC3

+1 (binding) * Built from source and ran tests * xsums/sigs good * KEYS is up to date * DISCLAIMER is present * L present in source release artifacts (and also in JARs where applicable) - command-line's NOTICE has a vague reference as the other projects to "Copyright 2010-2014 University of

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

renced. That being said, it's pretty clear that findbugs itself is lgpl, so I am also confused. Regardless, a more careful inspection and handling of our transitive dependencies is obviously called for. Thanks for the careful attention. :) Casey On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Josh Elser&l

Re: [DISCUSS] Podling report format changes

(so sorry, I think my fingers got a little antsy and sent a blank reply) +1 on #1 +1 on #2 given the clarification later in the thread. +1 on #3. I don't view it as a burden to leave a comment. Most of the time, I can just parrot events I was involved with, or a slightly more detailed version

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.1 (incubating) - rc2

. Please let me know if you need any further information on this. Thanks, Selva- From: Josh Elser<els...@apache.org> Reply-To: "d...@ranger.incubator.apache.org"<d...@ranger.incubator.apache.org> Date: Friday, August 19, 2016 at 11:14 AM To: "general@in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.1 (incubating) - rc2

Hi Selva, Were the licensing issues identified in the 0.6.0 IPMC vote resolved? [1] [2] If not, please do share the podling's plan to address the issue and when we can expect to see them fixed. Thanks! - Josh [1] https://s.apache.org/MSPd [2] https://s.apache.org/Cms1 Selvamohan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.1 (incubating) - rc2

+1 (binding) * xsums/sigs OK * Verified licensing issues from 0.6.0 were addressed (Thanks again, PPMC!) * Unit Tests passed * Could build from source * Verified tag in SCM * KEYS file is present Branding commentary: The website, notably the FAQ page[1], could use mention that the other ASF

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

+1 with reservations (binding) * DISCLAIMER present * LICENSE/NOTICE seem reasonable * xsums/sigs OK * Can build from source * Unit tests pass (after I stopped my local hbase instance, maybe you could use random ports from the ephemeral range for your test services instead of the default

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.1BETA-RC2

+1 (binding) * xsums/sigs OK (I think this is the second release, I think both from Metron, where firefox butchers the SHA xsum -- I have no idea why though. wget is fine) * L are OK. Some extra cruft in LICENSE file, but the main content is there. * Can build from source * Found no binaries

Re: [EXAMPLE] bootstrapping (was: Apache Example project?)

Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: On 3 October 2016 at 06:30, Luciano Resende wrote: +1, I had started something similar, at least on the website side, with best practices and required branding items. Please consider adding it to the "example" project :

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.2.0-incubating Release

Forwarding my +1 (binding) from the podling dev list. Ellison Anne Williams wrote: Hi Guys, The PPMC vote for the Apache Pirk 0.2.0-incubating release has passed. We kindly request that the IMPC now vote on the release.. The PPMC vote thread is located here:

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.1BETA-RC2

ing a peek at the release. On the MPack- we'd like to version it separately from the Metron release. Does that create any issue (other than unintended confusion :) ) ? Thanks again! -David... On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Josh Elser<els...@apache.org> wrote: +1 (binding) * xsums/

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.1BETA-RC2

hing that we missed? 1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/blob/master/metron-platform/metron-common/src/main/resources/META-INF/LICENSE is the one for metron-common On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Josh Elser<els...@apache.org> wrote: +1 (binding) * xsums/sigs OK (I think this is t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rya (Incubating) version 3.2.10 RC3

(Forwarding from ppmc) +1 (binding) Aaron D. Mihalik wrote: The Apache Rya community has voted and approved the proposed release of Apache Rya 3.2.10 (Incubating) RC3. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Rya (pronounced "ree-uh" /rēə/)

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Fluo Recipes 1.0.0-incubating (rc1)

(re-sending with proper subject) Original Message Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Fluo Recipes 1.0.0-incubating (rc1) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:39:20 -0400 From: Keith Turner Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org To: general@incubator.apache.org,

Re: Looking for a mentor for Gossip and Rya

Thanks, John! Will do that now before I forget. John D. Ament wrote: That and update podlings.xml On Nov 10, 2016 15:04, "Josh Elser"<els...@apache.org> wrote: Actaully, I should probably ask: is there any sort of formal process we need to go through to officially

Re: Looking for a mentor for Gossip and Rya

Actaully, I should probably ask: is there any sort of formal process we need to go through to officially add a new mentor on a podling? Or, simply add her name to http://incubator.apache.org/projects/rya.html? Josh Elser wrote: Thanks for volunteering, Billie! We're very lucky to have you

Re: Looking for a mentor for Gossip and Rya

Thanks for volunteering, Billie! We're very lucky to have you. Billie Rinaldi wrote: I can help out with mentoring Rya. Billie On Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:03:48 -, Sean Busbey wrote: Subject: Looking for a mentor for Gossip and Rya Hi Folks! Sadly, other commitments in

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fluo Recipes 1.0.0-incubating (rc1)

Forwarding my +1 (binding) Keith Turner wrote: Dear IPMC, Please vote for the following release candidate of Apache Fluo Recipes 1.0.0-incubating. PPMC vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d1e8ae5cef7c4ab1eac8192b742a3229b346335fec64afd080284dd4@%3Cdev.fluo.apache.org%3E Staged

Re: Looking for a mentor for Gossip and Rya

I'm going to also assume no objections from the Gossip side. I've taken the liberty to add you to podlings.xml and the Gossip podling incubator page[1]. Thanks for volunteering, Drew! - Josh [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/gossip.html Drew Farris wrote: Hi Sean, Unless I missed a

Re: [DISCUSS] Staged Artifact Locations (was Re: [VOTE] Release Gossip version gossip-0.1.1-incubating (RC2))

IMO, it prevents a one-line release command for Maven projects using the standard conventions (I'm blindly assuming is Maven is the most common tool used). However, I can also see where Justin is coming from with the provenance side of things (the disconnect between what was voted on and what

Re: [VOTE] Release Gossip version gossip-0.1.1-incubating (RC2)

Release this package? [ ] +1 yes [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because... Thank you, Edward Below is a copy of the [RESULT] for voting: - The vote for gossip-0.1.1-incubating (RC2) has passed. Josh Elser +1 P. Taylor Goetz +1 Gary Dusbabek +1 Chandresh Pancholi

Re: [DISCUSS] Significance of Artifact Names

John D. Ament wrote: So why am I harping on this problem? The incubator has a series of guides, which are partially treated as policy and partially treated as advice. Many of these guides remain with large notions of being draft only, not finalized, I want to try to get these draft documents

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

(late to the party) -1 (binding) as an ask to table the VOTE and try to reach some better consensus. I have to agree with Julian that some more discussion may be prudent here. There are definitely two divided camps, both of which bring good points to the table. * Differing policies for

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

+1 (binding) * xsums/sigs OK * Could build src and pip tarballs * L look OK with caveats * DISCLAIMER present While I appreciate the obvious effort that went into the assembly of your LICENSE file, there are some issues: * The Copyright clauses are disjoint from the bundled software. How do

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Metron podling Graduation

+1 from my limited interactions. I've had a few run-ins with the Metron crowd (winks) over the last year or so via IPMC votes. They've always been nice to work with and have shown positive responses from any release-time issues (e.g. licensing/branding). Casey Stella wrote: Hi Everyone,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

+1 (binding) * Could build the client, but I don't have a setup to build the server * DISCLAIMER in every artifact * Sufficient LICENSE & NOTICE files. Even in the WAR! Good job :) * Commits exist in SCM * Sigs/xsums OK In the future: * Your copyright in NOTICE files needs updating (2017) *

Re: [VOTE] Apache Metron podling Graduation

+1 (binding) Casey Stella wrote: Hi Everyone, I propose that we graduate Apache Metron (incubating) from the incubator. The full text of the proposal is below, with requisite modifications applied from the discussion thread. The discuss thread can be found at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-incubating-rc1

+0 (binding) * L pretty good (caveat below) * sigs/xsums OK * Was able to build all but mynewt-core (thus the +0). Am still trying to figure this out so I can switch to a +1. * Didn't see any binaries in source release(s) * DISCLAIMER is present * Website has incubator reference * incubating

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.5 (incubating)

+1 (binding) * xsums/sigs OK * rat check passed and can build from src (for both projects) * Spot checked included files * Commit is published in scm * DISCLAIMER is OK * L seem appropriate * Spot checked dependencies One suggestion for the future is to prune your RAT plugin configurations'

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Quickstep (incubating) 0.1.0 RC6

I'm so sorry, Marc. I didn't want to force you to have to roll another RC after the LEGAL issue John pointed out -- re-reading my last message, I didn't clearly state my intent to switch my vote from -1 to +1 (I'll blame that on being under the weather). Marc Spehlmann wrote: Hello IPMC,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-incubating-rc1

Switching this to a +1 (binding) "sjanc" on IRC was able to point me in the right direction enough to make me (think) that I have compiled everything from source :) (at least for one target) This would be a good area to include some clarity in the docs. Josh Elser wrote: +0 (bin

Re: Creating a podli...@incubator.apache.org mailing list

+1 John D. Ament wrote: All, Before I go ahead with it, wanted to see if others had any opinions. I'm planning to ask infra to create a podlings@i.a.o mailing list, which would go to all podlings dev@ list. There may be some scenarios where we need to communicate out to all podlings. For

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

-1 (binding) * xsums/sigs OK The key you provided isn't the one that was used to sign this release, FYI. You have D280F52E up on your people space, but used 5A29899A to sign this release. * Artifact starts with "apache-quickstep" and includes "incubating" * DISCLAIMER present * Missing

Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.92.0-incubating

+1 (binding) * xsums/sigs OK -- might want to start including sha256 * Spot-checked L * DISCLAIMER present * Can build from source * `mvn apache-rat:check -Prat` passes * Spot-checked the list of included files Sorry I missed this VOTE while on the podling list :). Thanks, Gour! - Josh Gour

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

Marc Spehlmann wrote: Thank you for reviewing Apache Quickstep 0.1.0 rc6 (incubating), everyone. With this I will close the vote. +1 Julian (binding) Jignesh -1 Josh (binding) As we received one -1 binding vote, we will not release rc6. ___ The biggest issue seems to be our licensing

Re: [VOTE] Release Gossip (Incubating) version gossip-0.1.2-incubating (RC1)

Fwd'ing my +1 (binding) from the ppmc Edward Capriolo wrote: I am pleased to call an IPMC vote for gossip-0.1.2-incubating. The PPMC vote thread is here: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5571d2996633f3a7ed10f3b0de3366702027db3b2f7870403c390141@%3Cdev.gossip.apache.org%3E Additionally a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

a link to how to assemble the LICENSE contents, in case you need it: http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps John On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:49 PM Josh Elser<els...@apache.org> wrote: Marc Spehlmann wrote: Thank you for reviewing Apache Quickstep 0.1.0 rc6 (incu

Re: [VOTE] Apache Quickstep (incubating) 0.1.0 RC7

Fwding +1 (binding) from ppmc list. On Mar 21, 2017 21:47, "Marc Spehlmann" wrote: > The Apache Incubator Quickstep community has approved a vote to release > Quickstep-0.1.0 RC7. Quickstep is a high performance relational database > system built from the ground up for

  1   2   >