เมื่อ 30 ต.ค. 2019 12:06 PM "Jean-Baptiste Onofré"
เขียนว่า
> Thanks David !
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 30/10/2019 02:40, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> Very interesting proposal.
>>>
>>> How do you compare with
Thanks David !
Regards
JB
On 30/10/2019 02:40, David Nalley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi David,
Very interesting proposal.
How do you compare with Apache Kafka or Pulsar ?
It sounds to address the same use cases, right ?
I would be interested to be
เมื่อ 30 ต.ค. 2019 8:41 AM "David Nalley" เขียนว่า
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi David,
> >
> > Very interesting proposal.
> >
> > How do you compare with Apache Kafka or Pulsar ?
> > It sounds to address the same use cases, right ?
> >
> > I would
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> Very interesting proposal.
>
> How do you compare with Apache Kafka or Pulsar ?
> It sounds to address the same use cases, right ?
>
> I would be interested to be mentor on the proposal if you are looking
> for an
Thanks Ming! I have the same hope and let's see how project and community
will be growing with Apache's magic and everyone's making effort!
Thanks,
Junping
Ming Wen 于2019年10月23日周三 下午12:02写道：
> yes, agreed, good luck for your incubating journey,
> and I hope TubeMQ can grow up to a diversity
yes, agreed, good luck for your incubating journey,
and I hope TubeMQ can grow up to a diversity community.
Thanks,
Ming Wen
Twitter: _WenMing
俊平堵 于2019年10月23日周三 上午9:52写道：
> As others’ reply, the challenge of building a diversity community do exists
> and we should sort it out during
Yeah, you made a very good point. We bring project to Apache Incubator
is for growing the community.
It take some time to let the team learn about the Apache Way. It could
be a growing pain because we need to change the mind set when doing
the project development.
Good luck for your project
As others’ reply, the challenge of building a diversity community do exists
and we should sort it out during incubation process but no need to special
concern before the incubation (thanks for reminding though).
About maintaining version, from my experience, it is simple to keep only
one version
Agree. My understanding is that it is magic of Apache incubation that help
the project to build a diversity community.
TubeMQ is working towards this direction although just get open sourced
last month ACNA 2019.
Thanks,
Junping
Tan,Zhongyi 于2019年10月23日 周三上午8:54写道：
> It is a challenge but it
It is a challenge but it is normal,
Many projects start from one company, then expand into community.
在 2019/10/22 下午10:49，“Willem Jiang” 写入:
I have the same concern as WenMing does.
It could be a challenge to build a diversity community for a project
which is just open sourced for
I have the same concern as WenMing does.
It could be a challenge to build a diversity community for a project
which is just open sourced for few month.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:29 AM Ming Wen wrote:
>
> Hi, this is an interesting proposal.
>
Hi Ted,
yes good point, you are right, let's eventually move this into a
dedicated thread.
Regards
JB
On 22/10/2019 07:20, Ted Dunning wrote:
> JBO,
>
> I agree with your curiosity, but maybe we should take it to another thread.
> Comparison to Kafka or Pulsar or ... doesn't really affect the
JBO,
I agree with your curiosity, but maybe we should take it to another thread.
Comparison to Kafka or Pulsar or ... doesn't really affect the question of
incubation.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 5:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As soon as we have communities, there's no problem.
>
Hi,
As soon as we have communities, there's no problem.
I think it would just be interesting to have some details about why
TubeMQ brings something different compare to existing MQ projects
(Kafka, Pulsar, ActiveMQ, etc).
The purpose is not to challenge projects each other but have better
Hi, this is an interesting proposal.
I think the competition among different MQ is not an issue for incubator
stage. Users and developers will have their own choices.
I guess that your challenges during the incubation:
expanding diversity (now committers come from one company),
and dealing with
Hi -
> On Oct 21, 2019, at 7:26 PM, 俊平堵 wrote:
>
> bq. You might be right about that the project currently I believe there's
> only one mentor with recent mentoring experience, and while all proposed are
> ASF members, not all of them are active on the IPMC general list. It might
> be better
Agree. Just like we have different SQL engines in Apache (Hive, Impala,
SparkSQL, Hawq, etc.) - most of them are competitive but have different
design trade-offs and have successful user/developer community. It
shouldn't be a concern for project incubator stage.
Thanks,
Junping
Sheng Wu
bq. You might be right about that the project currently I believe there's
only one mentor with recent mentoring experience, and while all proposed are
ASF members, not all of them are active on the IPMC general list. It might
be better for the project to have at least one other mentor with
Apache Pulsar is doing well and it is competing with Apache Kafka.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 21, 2019, at 3:10 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Kafka is one of the most well known Apache projects right now; I don’t
> think that’s a fair comparison.
>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at
Kafka is one of the most well known Apache projects right now; I don’t
think that’s a fair comparison.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:07, Sheng Wu wrote:
> Hi
>
> I don't see the competition among different MQ solutions is an issue. This
> happens among all OSS projects, inside or outside ASF.
> We
Hi
I don't see the competition among different MQ solutions is an issue. This
happens among all OSS projects, inside or outside ASF.
We are using the Apache Way to help the project to build the community.
If(only if) it is not better than Kafka in all fields(an assumption only),
it will/could end
Hi,
> The first one is if we are able to mentor the project well enough (old
> discussion).
You might be right about that the project currently I believe there's only one
mentor with recent mentoring experience, and while all proposed are ASF
members, not all of them are active on the IPMC
Hi David,
Very interesting proposal.
How do you compare with Apache Kafka or Pulsar ?
It sounds to address the same use cases, right ?
I would be interested to be mentor on the proposal if you are looking
for an additional one.
Regards
JB
On 21/10/2019 11:54, David Nalley wrote:
> Greetings
Hi David,
thanks for the nice proposal.
I think it was already introduced a bit at the ApacheCon NA so it may already
be known a bit to some folks.
The proposal reads quite nice and TubeMQ seems to be a really nice project and
has some impressive capabilities and USPs.
Although, those who know
24 matches
Mail list logo
