On Friday, 22. December. 2006 01:36, you wrote:
Hi Christian.
* On Dec 21 0:42, Christian Heim (gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org) wrote:
net-wireless/ipw2100 and net-wireless/ipw2200 are both kernel drivers
built as an external package through portage. The codebase currently in
portage is the
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 00:42 +0100, Christian Heim wrote:
net-wireless/ipw2100 and net-wireless/ipw2200 are both kernel drivers built
as
an external package through portage. The codebase currently in portage is the
same that is present in any up-to-date kernel tarball (2.6.x).
Just curious,
Hi,
so as you plugin a USB-disk, the kernel will recognize it, and it will
be called sda, sdb, sdc or whatever ...
I don't like that - why doesn't it get some more usefull device-name?
Some device name, that
a) indicates, that it is usb (for example put them to /dev/usb) and
b) uses a numering
On Saturday, 23 December 2006 2:40, Sven Köhler wrote:
Hi,
so as you plugin a USB-disk, the kernel will recognize it, and it will
be called sda, sdb, sdc or whatever ...
I don't like that - why doesn't it get some more usefull device-name?
Some device name, that
a) indicates, that it is
Sven Köhler napsal(a):
Hi,
so as you plugin a USB-disk, the kernel will recognize it, and it will
be called sda, sdb, sdc or whatever ...
I don't like that - why doesn't it get some more usefull device-name?
Completely off-topic here. Write yourself an UDEV rule, such as:
BUS==usb,
Sven Köhler kirjoitti:
Hi,
so as you plugin a USB-disk, the kernel will recognize it, and it will
be called sda, sdb, sdc or whatever ...
I don't like that - why doesn't it get some more usefull device-name?
Some device name, that
a) indicates, that it is usb (for example put them to
On Friday, 22. December. 2006 16:24, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 00:42 +0100, Christian Heim wrote:
net-wireless/ipw2100 and net-wireless/ipw2200 are both kernel drivers
built as an external package through portage. The codebase currently in
portage is the same that is
Trying to cleanup the faad/faac situation, I ended up thinking about a little
situation with Amarok.
Right now the aac useflag enable support for MP4v2 tags writing through
libmp4v2; the problem is that the library is licensed under MPL, while Amarok
is licensed under GPL, and they are likely
At the moment we represent the software we consider under GNU General Public
License, version 2 of the license, but we cannot be sure it's alright to
license it to any later version. Linux kernel for instance is licensed
_only_ under GPLv2, but not any later version.
What I propose is to copy
Christian Heim a écrit :
Furthermore, many users have a much easier time using the
externally-built module than the in-kernel drivers. I, personally, found
it to just work whereas the kernel drivers would not work without lots
of troubleshooting.
I haven't been in this situation, and I've
Christian Heim a écrit :
Heya,
net-wireless/ipw2100 and net-wireless/ipw2200 are both kernel drivers built as
an external package through portage. The codebase currently in portage is the
same that is present in any up-to-date kernel tarball (2.6.x).
For this reason I am suggesting,
On Saturday, 23 December 2006 7:44, Rémi Cardona wrote:
On second thoughts, I'll raise a small objection to the removal. Latest
gentoo version is 1.2.0 while the kernel (gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r2) says
to contain 1.1.4. I know that difference isn't exactly huge, but still,
it's a step
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:56:54 +0100
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the moment we represent the software we consider under GNU General
Public License, version 2 of the license, but we cannot be sure it's
alright to license it to any later version. Linux kernel for
Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:56:54 +0100
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the moment we represent the software we consider under GNU General
Public License, version 2 of the license, but we cannot be sure it's
alright to license it to any later
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:06:32 -0500
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:56:54 +0100
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the moment we represent the software we consider under GNU
General Public License, version 2
On Friday 22 December 2006 22:53, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
While for the ones that support v2 or later (this is actually a special
case of multiple licensing) we do:
LICENSE=GPL-2 GPL-3
when it becomes available?
There is one problem at least for this: to apply this method you'd have to
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 23:31:04 +0100
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 22 December 2006 22:53, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
While for the ones that support v2 or later (this is actually a
special case of multiple licensing) we do:
LICENSE=GPL-2 GPL-3
when it
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck schrieb:
On Saturday, 23 December 2006 2:40, Sven Köhler wrote:
Hi,
so as you plugin a USB-disk, the kernel will recognize it, and it will
be called sda, sdb, sdc or whatever ...
I don't like that - why doesn't it get some more usefull device-name?
Some device name,
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Comments, ideas, proposals?
currently we have all those under GPL-2. Now when GPL-3 becomes available
people have the option to use GPL-3. However that will still allow people
to use GPL-2 if their patents, etc need it. SO it is not much difference.
The big
On Saturday, 23 December 2006 10:08, Sven Köhler wrote:
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck schrieb:
On Saturday, 23 December 2006 2:40, Sven Köhler wrote:
Hi,
so as you plugin a USB-disk, the kernel will recognize it, and it will
be called sda, sdb, sdc or whatever ...
I don't like that - why
Guys,
Please take this discussion to gentoo-user or some such place - it
doesn't belong on this list.
--
-Charlie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Andrew Gaffney [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:08:45 -0600:
Roy Marples wrote:
Hi list.
Not often I issue a last rites, but here we go!
rt2x00-beta3 driver is going to be masked over the next few days and
then removed from portage around
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 12:10:44AM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 22 December 2006 23:43, Alec Warner wrote:
Say I approve only GPL-3 packages (cause' I hate patents, and I dislike
having a working system too!). This would encompass anything strictly
GPL-3 and also
23 matches
Mail list logo
