Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo desktop system built with musl libc.

2015-08-19 Thread Alexander Hof
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Anthony G. Basile schrieb: Hi everyone, Tigger alert ... shameless plug. I sent the following to the musl-libc email list yesterday. I thought other gentoo devs may be interested in what I've been up to with musl: [...] Very interesting!

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/{a lot of packages}

2015-08-19 Thread Patrice Clement
# Patrice Clement monsie...@gentoo.org (19 Aug 2015) # Upstream dead: no releases since 2010. # Technology has moved on and there are far better alternatives # (easymock, mockito and jmock). # Masked for removal in 30 days. See bug #190307. dev-java/mockobjects # Patrice Clement

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo desktop system built with musl libc.

2015-08-19 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote: Tigger alert ... shameless plug. I sent the following to the musl-libc email list yesterday. I thought other gentoo devs may be interested in what I've been up to with musl: Very cool! Cheers, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:00:49AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote: On 08/19/2015 07:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is practically useless. If there

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Matthew Thode
On 08/19/2015 12:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is practically

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Zac Medico
On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote: On 08/19/2015 07:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is practically useless. If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his

[gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread hasufell
I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is practically useless. If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you want me to add Package-Manager: paludis-2.4.0 to every commit

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 06:33:16PM +0200, hasufell wrote: I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is practically useless. If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 19.08.2015 18:33, hasufell wrote: I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is practically useless. If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you want me to add

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread hasufell
On 08/19/2015 07:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is practically useless. If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his repoman version (which I believe was the

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is practically useless. If there has been a problem with a

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread hasufell
On 08/19/2015 08:00 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: On 08/19/2015 12:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed,

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread hasufell
On 08/19/2015 08:00 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote: And how often was that useful in practice? Well, there haven't been any EAPI bumps lately. However, in the time that follows an EAPI bump, it can be very useful if there are new dependency features that

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:09 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: Signed-off-by has a completely different purpose which is not part of our workflow, so that tag is pretty useless to us most of the time. See https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Talk:Gentoo_git_workflow#Sign-Off I agree.

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Zac Medico
On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is practically useless. If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you want me to add

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Damien Robichaud
V

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Matthew Thode
On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is practically useless. If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his repoman version (which I believe was the

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:24:24 -0400 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:09 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: Signed-off-by has a completely different purpose which is not part of our workflow, so that tag is pretty useless to us most of the time. See

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Zac Medico
On 08/19/2015 11:11 AM, hasufell wrote: On 08/19/2015 08:00 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote: And how often was that useful in practice? Well, there haven't been any EAPI bumps lately. However, in the time that follows an EAPI bump, it can be very useful if there

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:25:51 -0400 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote: It does not other the the metadata.dtd file it checks for updates and updates itself with. But that is very likely to change with the rewrite I

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: using Ninja in more CMake-based packages

2015-08-19 Thread Johannes Huber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 06/07/15 um 17:08 schrieb Michał Górny: Hello, developers. [snip] Sadly, there are two problems with using Ninja: 1) it will not work with some packages, [snip] So, what do you think? Should I start switching random packages to

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote: It does not other the the metadata.dtd file it checks for updates and updates itself with. But that is very likely to change with the rewrite I have in progress (albeit slowly). I have also seriously been contemplating

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo desktop system built with musl libc.

2015-08-19 Thread Anthony G. Basile
Hi everyone, Tigger alert ... shameless plug. I sent the following to the musl-libc email list yesterday. I thought other gentoo devs may be interested in what I've been up to with musl: I want to announce to the list that I've built and will be maintaining three hardened, fully featured