to
know there's yet another package that can be installed using gentoo's portage
on yet another architecture.
How do you feel with that idea?
Regards,
Christian Parpart.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 23:53:51 Markus Ullmann wrote:
Some numbers to back Vlastimil up
Yep there's still development going on, devs commit ebuilds and stuff.
http://cia.vc/stats/project/gentoo
Also, as said many times, number of devs participating in flamewars here
is pretty low
* of us act like that.
regards,
Christian Parpart.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 07 June 2007 09:10:41 Kent Fredric wrote:
On 6/7/07, Kumba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyways, thoughts?
--Kumba
+1
+1 here too
possible alternative names: gentoo-soap, gentoo-gossip ( not to be
confused with net-im/gossip )
gentoo-soap, lol!
signature.asc
Description:
.
Hope these thoughts help,
Christian Parpart.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday 19 September 2005 15:22, warnera6 wrote:
Mark Loeser wrote:
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
I think that dev-util is a very specific category containing
development utilities of some sort. There might be some
misclassifications in them, but from a user perspective I don't really
care
of that kind.
However, we've some more no-herd'ed packages to put into this new potential
c++ herd - but these are two different discussions/threads IMHO.
Regards,
Christian Parpart.
pgpmomqy0QfGN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
with these as the upstream author is a pretty
cool guy and gets back to me :)
-mike
but having some backup is always the safer way, in case some of us is AFK for
some unobvious reasons and a security patch is to be injected.
Regards,
Christian Parpart
pgpUVooVe8STE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
necessary?
indeed, it at least helps curious c++ devs to browse through some yet unknown
c++ libs and he maybe finds something useful.
Regards,
Christian Parpart.
pgpzHaXkO28CW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday 17 September 2005 14:01, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On 17/9/2005 13:33:30, Christian Parpart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Saturday 17 September 2005 11:36, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On 17/9/2005 0:20:57, Mark Loeser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
C++ herd is a good idea, especially
On Friday 02 September 2005 06:28, Lance Albertson wrote:
Grant Goodyear wrote:
Christian Parpart wrote: [Thu Sep 01 2005, 05:45:43PM CDT]
This just leads me to assume you're not really a coder (wrt native
programming languages like C/C++), are you?
*Grin* This sort of condescending
do some guy need this, but hey, programmers are
really creative, and use what the compiler accepts - I myself ran into this
while porting my apps/libs to amd64. And think of it, not everybody has the
money to grab one.
Congrats,
Christian Parpart.
pgpKwfrGKm0Ue.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 18 August 2005 19:01, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
maillog: 18/08/2005-16:28:40(+0200): Christian Parpart types
Using the minimal useflag for this - IMHO - is a misuse of the idea of
minimal semantically - as I do understand minimal in a way like don't
overbloat me with patches
enheancement. (IMO)
All in all, I think it isn't worth even attempting at this time.
read above. do you still think so? If so, why?
Regards,
Christian Parpart.
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=55816
--
04:43:52 up 148 days, 17:51, 1 user, load average: 0.66, 0.76, 1.15
be the same package; though slotted, and with differend homepage
URL.
But anyway, I feel that these cases in realworld are really very rare (except
the the license-change thingy)
just my thoughts,
Christian Parpart.
--
05:28:28 up 140 days, 18:36, 0 users, load average: 0.14, 0.18, 0.23
did some more effords on
this partiular package.
don't flame me now, but I forgot what package exactly it has been, however,
the wact still remains.
finally, genlop still has a user base (including me). So I wouldn't dare in
dropping it.
Regards,
Christian Parpart.
--
04:32:01 up 123 days
of commercial software of this
subject and just a few few (serious) open sourced ones.
So, finally, in what category could those packages be placed in?
Thanks in advance,
Christian Parpart.
--
23:17:49 up 119 days, 12:25, 0 users, load average: 4.17, 2.57, 3.12
pgpY2xXfkksE9.pgp
Description
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 23:58, Christian Parpart wrote:
dev-libs/libyacsutil
- the support library (client/server)
community-libs/libyacs
- the YaCS core framework library (server)
community-server/yacsd
- the UNIX daemon process finally serving the community
app-admin
to do with www et al. so, net-misc
seems best then.
[...]
You shouldn't create categories for anything less than about 10 to 20
ebuilds. The more the better, really.
I understand.
So, as Oliview proposed the same like you, I gonna stick with this then.
Thanks all,
Christian Parpart.
--
00
.
Seriousely, why did we put all our power into those improvements when we're
now about to revert mostly everything?
Regards,
Christian Parpart.
--
Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
09:29:00 up 27 days, 22:35, 0 users, load average: 0.01, 0.05, 0.00
pgpFGxPPtrag7.pgp
Description: PGP
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 2:14 pm, Lance Albertson wrote:
Christian Parpart wrote:
And yeah, I disagree to a move-back, too!! I'm most likely not to support
this in any kind, instead, I'd be willing in pushing p.mask'ed apache
httpd 2.1 into the tree, so, that I don't have to live
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 10:59 am, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:36, Christian Parpart wrote:
And yeah, I disagree to a move-back, too!! I'm most likely not to
support this in any kind, instead, I'd be willing in pushing p.mask'ed
apache httpd 2.1 into the tree, so
to *always* complain) report in *detail*.
Finally, just don't use svn if you feel that uncomfortable with it. No one
said that cvs will go away. I'm tired of reading your 'svn is hard to merge
because it *is* hard to merge' posts :(
Sorry, but this is how it comes over.
Christian Parpart
On Monday 11 April 2005 10:42 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:23:29 +0200 Christian Parpart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Monday 11 April 2005 8:26 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:57:12 +0200 Christian Parpart
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| wrote
for
commonapache/apache.conf) from scratch.
Regards,
Christian Parpart.
--
the following rfc contains how to quote on lists like this:
Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
17:57:59 up 18 days, 7:04, 0 users, load average: 0.28, 0.31, 0.35
pgprALEbGGY3f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 10 April 2005 8:34 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 20:27:03 +0200 Christian Parpart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Both have pros and cons. Well, the ASF has everyting converted into a
| single repository and they seem to be just lucky with it. KDE is
| about to convert
) on your system(s) and please report any oddies you
experience.
Thanks in advance,
Christian Parpart.
[1] http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?apache-2.0.53
[2] http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?apache-1.3.33-r2
--
Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
15:57:13 up 50 days, 12:22, 1
27 matches
Mail list logo
