On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 21:39:32 -0500
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 February 2010 12:03:16 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > If no one objects, I will look forward to committing the patch in a
> > week or two.
>
> commit it already :p
Thanks for the reminder. In the same
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:08:06 +0100
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> 4. Notify
> =
> - Report back problems with this process
>
> - Mail fellow maintainers of dev-util/${PN} about the move
>
> - If ${PN} is a big one (Subversion, Git, you know the list)
> - Update documentation (now or open
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:35:28 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> And this is why the move wasn't done five years ago: by the time we'd
> worked out everything we'd need to do by hand because epkgmove was
> broken, the whole thing got bikeshedded to death.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56967
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:47:55 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> > Attached is a list of ebuild that use ftp.gnu.org instead of
> > mirror://gnu in their SRC_URI. Please make the switch. Maybe this
> > should
Hello developers,
this has annoyed me for a long time.
restore_config() dies when it cannot find a saved config file, while
later on in any ebuild that uses savedconfig.eclass, it will save the
config file anyhow. That means it will not use an edited saved config
file during the first emerge
Hello package maintainers,
most of the GNU packages had their LICENSE updated to GPL-3 along with
some minor bug fixes or even just documentation changes in recent
times. Please do check the LICENSE and adjust it if needed.
Oh, and one other thing. Attached is a list of ebuild that use
ftp.
As set out in bug #304435 [1], we should declare some policy about
changes to arch profiles in devmanual or in the Developer Handbook.
Basically, I would want to have this apply to arch profile changes as
well:
[5] http://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html says:
= Keywording on Upgr
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:11:31 +0100
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Your proposal does not look to appealing to me. What about people
> trying to keep "pollution" down and avoid one or the other toolkit?
Some packages don't use a USE flag to pull those in, since the toolkit
dependency isn't optiona
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:18:59 +0100
Arnaud Launay wrote:
> I have absolutely no idea how much work it requires, so I won't
> complain if TC says it's too complicated/unpratical/etc.
rm -r * is easy.
> BTW, I have no knowledge of the concept of proxy-maintainer, I'll
> look at it tomorrow, it's 2
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:37:19 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> So going with this idea... Isn't the treecleaner masking 30-day at
> present? What about extending that just a bit, to 5 weeks total,
> while reducing the actual masking to 4 weeks, with the extra week a
> wait time
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:51:28 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> > you need to fix your filter then. an "open bug" is not an
> > acceptable reason for masking a package. if you're going to clean
> > a package, you need to research actual reasons to mask & punt.
> > -mike
> Dont be joking,
> Your appro
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:32:06 +0200
Markos Chandras wrote:
> Thanks for saving this package. As Jeremy said, there is absolutely
> no way to measure the popularity of a package. So if it has no
> maintainer, and open bugs we have to mask it and announce it here. It
> is up to you whether you want
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:02:14 +0100
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> I'm working on getting 2.5.1 in the tree (and fixing a USE=python and
> some other issues while I'm at it).
net-nntp/inn-2.5.1 is in the tree and fixes many (QA) issues. Please
track bug #300650 [1] if you want to stay
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:30:24 +0100
Arnaud Launay wrote:
> But, if I understand this announce correctly, the complete inn
> port will be dropped to oblivion.
Yes, and that shouldn't (and won't) happen.
> Wouldn't it be better to stabilize inn 2.5 (there's even a 2.5.1
> release out there, with a
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:31:08 -0500
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 11 January 2010 16:05:16 Markos Chandras wrote:
> > # Markos Chandras (11 Jan 2010)
> > # Fails with -Wl,--as-needed
> > # bug #182782. Removal in 30 days
> > net-nntp/inn
>
> is as-needed support really a valid reason for pun
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:00:57 -0500
Vincent Launchbury wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
> > Quickly checking wikipedia (without verifying further), I'm probably
> > thinking about a different license, but I had it in my head that
> > GPLv1 had a "no commercial use" clause (or allowed it), and that is
> > wh
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:00:57 -0500
Vincent Launchbury wrote:
> But isn't this a problem with GPL-2 and 3 also? The term
> GPL-compatible is too vague--which version is it referring to? For
> example, see http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ again:
>
>Please note that GPLv2 is, by itself, n
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:33:42 +0100
Thilo Bangert wrote:
> Jeroen Roovers said:
> [snip]
> > Feel free to
> > CC me on bugs related to this package if you find any more pressing
> > issues.
>
> the standard way of indicating such an interest is to add yourself t
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:10:48 +0100 (CET)
lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
> let's discuss concerns here (actually I don't see any and I am
> willing to fix all the ebuilds and close all my bugs if you ack).
If they are genuine bugs, then there isn't anything to discuss.
> List of Gentoo bugs:
Tracker bu
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:36:34 -0500
Vincent Launchbury wrote:
> Also relating to this, what is freedist? The package app-text/dos2unix
> lists 'freedist' as its license, and /usr/portage/licenses/freedist
> says only "Freely Distributable". Several other packages do this, and
> I'm sure it's not c
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:29:39 +0100
Diego E. Pettenò wrote:
>
> # Diego E. Pettenò (24 Dec 2009)
> # on behalf of QA team
> #
> # Fails to build if /usr/X11R6 is not present (bug #247737,
> # open November 2008).
> #
> # Removal on 2010-02-22
> media-gfx/viewer
Oh, I fixed it in under five min
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:37:26 -0500
Richard Freeman wrote:
> I think we should definitely have some way of designating which
> should be the contact for bugs. I've had some bugs sit around for a
> while without being noticed because they were assigned to the herd
> the package is in, and not to m
Neither the ballot nor the announcement contains the actual
question that is to be voted on. In the case of the announcement the
problem isn't as huge as with the ballot, so the latter should be fixed
soon, I guess.
Roy's message does mention the actual question (and I must say that
it's rather va
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:11:37 +0100
Torsten Veller wrote:
> > Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> > > But if we look on tag of screen-4.0.3 or its release:
> > > screen-4.0.3.tar.gz07-Aug-2008 06:30 821K
> > > screen-4.0.3.tar.gz.sig07-Aug-2008 06:30 65
>
> *screen-4.0.3 (25 Oct 2006)
>
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 18:20:00 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> But if we look on tag of screen-4.0.3 or its release:
> screen-4.0.2.tar.gz27-Jan-2004 05:46 821K
> screen-4.0.2.tar.gz.sig27-Jan-2004 05:47 65
> screen-4.0.3.tar.gz07-Aug-2008 06:30 821K
> screen-4.0.3.ta
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:24:10 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> * Masking beta...
> This masks are good if the software release is KNOWN to break
> previous behaviour or degrade user experience. Otherwise the software
> should not be masked (its TESTING for purpose, not stable).
> Also the maintainer sh
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:00:03 -0500
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Just so it is clear and there aren't any questions in the future. The
> XFCE team maintains a set of recommended global use flags in our
> docs[1] (maintained by Josh (nightmorph)). So, whatever direction
> this ends up, xfce will not be g
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:33:35 -0400
Mark Loeser wrote:
> I'd say this isn't correct. Unstable isn't a pure testing playground.
> its meant for packages that should be considered for stable.
I happen to disagree. Since the advent of outside overlays and layman,
we've seen many more bugs that only
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:22:13 +0200
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> We are working on a proper explanation targetted to devs of this. I'm
> sorry for the inconvenience caused.
How large of a change to the tree will this involve? Is it a small
number of packages that need to be fixed through the ebuilds
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 20:38:18 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Some packages, like dbus[1], have testing features that, while useful
> for developers and arch-testers, aren't something that should be
> foisted on users. Dbus' case is extreme, as it builds-in functions
> that are useful for unit testing, b
Qt3 deprecation is now tracked in bug #283429 [1]
Regards,
jer
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/283429
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:33:52 -0700
Ned Ludd wrote:
>huge fscking snip<
Thank you. You were top of my list and I am counting on you. :)
Regards,
jer
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:50:22 +1200
Alistair Bush wrote:
> I would believe that recent history would show the opposite. There
> seem to be a group of developers at which the mere mention of ciaranm
> results in setting them off. Regardless of the technical merits of a
> solution they seem more i
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:48:03 +0100
AllenJB wrote:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274197
>
> The above bug brings up 2 issues:
>
> First, hplip says one thing, but does another with qt3 and qt4
> use-based dependencies. This is obviously a bug that needs to be
> fixed.
>
> As a user,
On Thu, 28 May 2009 00:54:40 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > None needed, seems to be the major voice.
>
> So it's your opinion that Gentoo should go with an in every way
> inferior solution that doesn't solve the problem as well?
I was merely overstating the obvious.
jer
On Thu, 28 May 2009 00:45:18 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2009 23:26:25 + (UTC)
> Mark Bateman wrote:
> > NOT once within GLEP55 [...]
> Not once has there been an equally good alternative proposed.
None needed, seems to be the major voice.
jer
On Mon, 18 May 2009 16:16:46 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Why do you think I wrote the awful hack that is versionator?
Why don't you explain why, historically, you put that in the tree? It
would help us now if you were to simply record your mistakes for
everybody else to easily avoid. It's sti
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:11:02 +0400
Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Вск, 05/04/2009 в 22:41 +0200, Timothy Redaelli пишет:
> > i think it's better to develop an "emerge --info package"
>
> It already exists. But regretfully it does not provide useful output
> even about the package's USE flags so I susp
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:55:38 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> These herds have no members:
> ... <
> live-cd:
> app-admin/pwgen
> app-arch/pbzip2
> app-misc/livecd-tools
> dev-python/pyparted
> dev-util/catalyst
> media-gfx/splash-themes-livecd
> sys-apps/ddcxinfo-knoppix
> sys-apps/gli
> sys-apps/hwda
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:21:23 +0200
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Let's try something new. I would like to get opinions [...]
A multitude of leaves on every branch of the tree. That could be a
multiple of the current tree size - maybe talk to infra about this.
It's also a multitude of complexity - as an
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:24:25 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> http://git.pioto.org/gitweb/paludis.git?a=commitdiff;h=86dc61e
Thanks. I hope it helps.
jer
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:55:06 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Heck, Paludis even tells you this if you run --info without a spec:
>
> > No packages were specified on the command line, so detailed
> > information is not available (Paludis can display detailed
> > information for both installed and
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:55:06 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> ...which is why you ask for 'paludis --info pkg', not 'paludis
> --info'.
Spread the word!
jer
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:35:00 +0100
Dawid Węgliński wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 of February 2009 23:22:12 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > In short, `paludis --info' is not a replacement, and when `emerge
> > --info' is asked for in a bug report, post *that*.
>
> Hi Je
Hi folks,
both in #gentoo and more importantly in bug reports, people are often
asked to provide their `emerge --info', which gives a quick and
very useful overview of the most important bits found on the system that
wants support or (allegedly) exhibits a bug. Based on that information
it i
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:02:21 +
Mike Auty wrote:
> According to [1], "When the file lists multiple entries, then you
> assign the bug to the first maintainer, and CC the other
> maintainer(s) and herd(s)." So it looks as though the file should go
> through the maintainers first and herds seco
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:52:11 +0100
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please be so kind and use full package atoms in the bug description
> line (especially when bug wrangling), searching is made easier that
> way.
"Bug reports that refer to a single or a few (similar) packages
should det
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:50:07 -0600
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> So you are asking for the layman file to be updated properly or what?
I assume for now that you meant [1]. As far as I can tell, that file
would be useable if it didn't just follow whatever policy is set up for
layman access to overlays. T
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:50:07 -0600
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> So you are asking for the layman file to be updated properly or what?
I specifically didn't go into the minor technical details (of files and
formats and so on) and described a basic process. Currently there is
no well-defined process, and
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 13:56:15 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> What would really benefit Gentoo would be able to have the package
> manager aware of [...]
I am sure you know of one that would provide... :)
jer
Hi folks,
in light of some recent discussions where overlay maintainers found
that bug reports had been assigned "incorrectly" and thought it was apt
to inform the miscellaneous bug wranglers of the correct assignees, I
thought it would be a good idea to introduce a new list, akin to
metadat
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:56:18 -0500
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Probably about as hard as it would be to get you to stop top posting
> like an Outlook 95 user...
IMHO the problem isn't top posting, but excessive quoting. :)
Kind regards,
jer
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:40:19 +0100
Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
> From both a maintainers and arch-developers view: I'd like to see
> automatically generated stable requests, but I'd leave it up to the
> maintainer/herd/team to add architectures after a quick review (also
> if there's a auto-stable-re
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:00:16 +0100
Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> # Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (02 Dec 2008)
> # Removal because it has been integrated into Claws Mail
> # Either use mail-client/claws-mail-3.6.1 (plain) or 3.6.1-r1
> # (USE=smime)
> mail-cl
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:26:51 + (UTC)
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Words
> > like "production", "critical" and "important" can be applied as
> > easily to the state of a company's or nation's system as to a
> > single person's.
> Yes, but it's a relative thing.
>huge snip<
That's wha
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:06:02 + (UTC)
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it's a "production, critical, important" system, then what is one
> doing installing updates on it directly without verifying them on a
> generally identical test system first?
Now you're ridiculing the idea of havi
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:42:27 +
Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sys-block/viaideinfo
And that one.
rej
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:42:27 +
Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dev-util/rej
Taken. Unavoidable really. :)
Kind regards,
jer
Hi everyone,
while I am away (from tomorrow until next Saturday - see my away
message for the latest details) others will need to do some bug
wrangling. Please familiarise yourself with [1] if you choose to
participate.
Kind regards,
JeR
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/bug-wran
On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:22:14 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:
> Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/abandoned/
>
> What about www.unmaintained-free-software.org? Possibly opening a
> page?
On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 08:49:04 +0200
Hans de Graaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the suggestion is to have one generic homepage for all
> packages without one, not a Gentoo-specific homepage for each project.
+1
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/abandoned/
Put that in all ebuilds for packages
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:23:33 +0200
Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think it's ok. ~arch isn't training ground. It's supposed to
> work, so asking arch teams to keywords packages that are not supposed
> to work isn't good.
We have a "testing" branch and a "stable" branch, defin
; have been
masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to
complete your request:
- www-client/opera-9.60_pre2440 (masked by: package.mask)
/keeps/gentoo/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (26 Aug 2008)
# www-client/opera snapshots are m
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:24:35 +0200
Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # Gen 2 Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (`date`)
> # Masked for testing.
> >=rofl-cat/omgpkg-ver
>
>
> Please people,
>
>
>if you want to get something tested, then do
# Gen 2 Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (`date`)
# Masked for testing.
>=rofl-cat/omgpkg-ver
Please people,
if you want to get something tested, then don't mask it. If you find
that you cannot commit an ebuild because of badly keyworded
dependencies, then drop the relevant keywords and file a
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:22:12 -0600
Joe Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry if this answer can be found elsewhere, but if one has a proxy
> maintainer (i.e. not a Gentoo dev) for a package, can/should this
> person be added to metadata.xml? Is there a special tag for this? I
> can certain
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:32:20 +0300
Mart Raudsepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Setting test USE flag is never appropriate as far as I know.
> FEATURES=test enables the USE flag on its own, and it should never be
> enabled or disabled in a users USE settings in /etc/make.conf or any
> other place. F
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:17:48 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should LICENSE changes require a revision bump?
No.
Any ebuild should be published with a correct reference to a license.
If you initially publish the ebuild with a bad reference, you simply
correct it later on. It's not a
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:13:26 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is the benefit?
> There is none really. Allow all use flags to exist in metadata.xml.
> It's really more of a clarification to the GLEP if this is allowed.
I personally think that this would facilitate a lot of
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:33:04 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a distribution we should strive to make as many packages available
with as many features as possible on as many architectures (or indeed
operating systems) as possible.[1] Not communicating important changes
in ebuilds t
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:26:18 + (UTC)
Xx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I picked this message as the current last in thread to reply to. Please
allow me to express my sincere distaste at the hijacking of this
retirement announcement thread for (political) profit and/or fun.
To the retirees: be
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 23:43:32 +0200
"Denis Dupeyron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's my pleasure to introduce Thomas Anderson (gentoofan23) as an
It seems that you've been living two lives. One life, you're Thomas A.
Anderson, program writer for a respectable software company. You have a
social s
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:50:01 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If people wish to take specific categories, please let this thread
> know.
I'm working on net-analyzer.
Regards,
JeR
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 02:22:35 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:13:44 +0200
> Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:43:06 +0100
> > Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:43:06 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People are already doing those other things, and doing them badly,
> because there's currently no other option. This isn't some
> hypothetical future requirement.
When you wrote "doing them badly", did you mean to imp
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 22:18:06 +0200
Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PN}-9.00-install.patch"
> > + epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PN}-9.00-install.patch" || \
> > + die "failed to apply install patch"
>
> epatch dies on its own, so no need for all the
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:26:13 +0100
"Tony \"Chainsaw\" Vroon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 01:16 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > 1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
>
> If it is for software where I
Hi fellow developers,
it seems I've run into a minor issue with fellow bug wrangler carlo
(who has been putting a lot of work into that, for which we should all
be grateful).
Carsten has a cut-and-paste message that he posts in comments to
version bump bug reports that he finds have been fi
To anyone (else) out there who thinks that bug wranglers should be
punished when they make mistakes in the heap of unthankful work they
perform on a more than daily basis, I would like you to know that if
you reassign bugs (back) to bug-wranglers@ without properly
communicating the reason you are d
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:06:21 +0100
David Leverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason has already been explained multiple times, kindly stop
> with the personal attacks and silly conspiracy theories.
In this case the attacks seem to be targeting a person who has been
attacking an entire ~300
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:20:10 +0100
David Leverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's to stop an application from loading a "normal" library using
> libtool's dlopen wrapper (perhaps so it can fail gracefully if the
> library is missing, for example)?
That's a pretty basic definition of a plugin.
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:21:24 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that everything these days is an EAPI scope change. That's
> not very useful for Gentoo, considering it's been quite some time
> since PMS was proposed and we've not seen approval for either EAPI=0
> or EAPI
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:29:07 +0200
Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gentoo Arch Testing Tool: http://gatt.sourceforge.net/> for all
> arch workers and testers.
I call SPAM! (Now keyworded ~hppa.)
Kind regards,
JeR
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 12:27:52 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The current council has raised "never actually deciding anything" to
> an art form.
Barking up the wrong (portage) tree again?
Kindest regards,
JeR
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 06:44:59 -0700
"Chip Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although it'll be a bit slower than a direct grep: for m in `find
> /usr/portage -name metadata.xml `; do grep -Rn foo $m;done
That would be horribly slow by comparison. :)
Kind regards,
JeR
--
gentoo-dev@lists.g
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 20:21:11 +0100
"Alex Howells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any time :) In which case I guess maybe Jeroen Roovers (rej / jer)
> wants that spot on the ticket? ;) I'd like to nominate him too.
> Looks like we'll have plenty of choice this
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 19:29:28 +0200
Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07 Jun 2008)
> # Various bugs and dead upstream
> # herdstat: 164254, 184035, 222887
And bug 206879.
Kind regards,
JeR
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:17:05 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:11:44 +0200
> Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, I would have thought there was a requirement to have been a
> > developer for at least a year, j
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:46:53 +0100
George Prowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct. Only developers can vote but anyone can nominate:
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/
> 6. Voting Process
>
> * Council elections generally happen once a year
>
> * Anyone can nominate (nomi
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 21:37:40 +0200
Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You may also want to consider the following:
> threadsonly [dev-libs/boost]
> ithreads [sys-devel/libperl]
> orathreads[dev-libs/libsqlora8]
> frnothreads [net-dialup/freeradius
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:25:29 +0200
Christian Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we should be consistent here
You may also want to consider the following:
threadsonly [dev-libs/boost]
ithreads [sys-devel/libperl]
orathreads[dev-libs/libsqlora8]
frnothreads [net-dialup/f
On Sat, 31 May 2008 01:09:33 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> net-ftp/ncftp
Yoink!
Kind regards,
JeR
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 25 May 2008 02:26:42 +0530
"Arun Raghavan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if has_version =dev-python/gtkspell-2*; then
> LICENSE="GPL-2"
> else
> LICENSE="LGPL-2.1"
> fi
>
> There is currently *no* way to express this in an ebuild without
> invalidating the cache. For now this is ju
On Fri, 16 May 2008 11:19:45 -0500
Yuri Vasilevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll be adding things like debhelper, lintian and a little
> bit later things like apt, aptitude, cdebootstrap, debian-live and
> some more. Also there is debootstrap with
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] which I'd like to adopt.
On Tue, 13 May 2008 09:33:21 +0300
"Alon Bar-Lev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have fun,
> Alon.
Thank you,
JeR
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Hi developers and other users,
since jakub[1] went completely missing a few weeks ago a few others and
I have been wrangling the bugs. I've heard rumours that this isn't
working smoothly yet. Of course most of that can be fully blamed on
bugzilla itself, but there are some things that need t
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:22:14 +0100
Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks especially to the arch teams for all the time they put in for
> us in testing and stabilising Haskell packages on such a wide range
> of platforms. I feel I should also apologise to jer for constantly
> breaking g
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:02:29 +0100
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to get technical but how difficult is it really to change USE
> flag names? I appreciate that users are out of sync yadda yadda, but
> could this kind of thing not be considered out of band data similar
> to news?
>
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:06:07 +0200
Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd say we should convert it to a global use flag now with a good
> description and change it to gnome-keyring later in case we really
> have a package which needs 'keyring' for something else.
Needless to say it would
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:04:36 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 19:38 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:33:17 +0300
> > Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > "It works. Do i
501 - 600 of 683 matches
Mail list logo
