se used to be in @system and were dropped at some point once ebuilds
> had proper deps. My guess would be ppl wanted to keep them commented
> out just in case it appeared to be a bad idea to drop them and be able
> to "revert" easily. Nowadays, we can probably assume it was o
ed to add ebuilds they
> don't hold copyright on without permission. A DCO would probably help
> with this, which is why that is generally considered a best practice.
>
+1
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/24/2016 09:21 AM, Daniel Campbell (zlg) wrote:
> What would you call what I decribed, though; Acked?
Acked-By and/or Reviewed-By (although we don't have a specific
reviewer's statement in Gentoo (yet?))
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.
it itself is good enough for this but I personally prefer verbosity.
> It also calls out that it wasn't my work.
>
This sounds more like a reviewed by or acked by?
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8
e list would be helpful for discussions in any case to know the scope,
instead of making mountains out of molehills
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ing to
spend 50 minutes on the compile.
I'm wondering if it wouldn't make sense to provide this as a binary
package in a binhost instead of a -bin though (thats what I use
internally myself in any case).
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB
://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/FOSDEM_2017 (but
nearly without content yet)
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
at this differentiation would matter?
>
> In my opinion yes, the following reasons at minimum
Wouldn't it make more sense to include information on this in
metadata.xml rather than specifying it in the package name?
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keys
On 10/11/2016 05:56 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 11/10/16 16:53, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 10/11/2016 05:38 PM, ng0 wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> if this hasn't already caught your interest here's a forward from
>>> guile-dev, should be of interest
please file a bug in the
future for reporting issues, the gentoo-dev ML is not the correct place
for it.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t links or files I think merging this project with Public
> Relations will work nicely.
Sounds good to me
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/01/2016 12:45 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016, 00:12:26 schrieb Kristian Fiskerstrand:
>> On 10/01/2016 12:09 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>>> Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016, 00:01:54 schrieb Kristian Fiskerstrand:
>>>>> This *
On 10/01/2016 12:09 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016, 00:01:54 schrieb Kristian Fiskerstrand:
>
>>> This *will* break the following ebuilds:
>>>
>>> www-apps/bugzilla-4.4.12
>>> www-apps/bugzilla-5.0.3
>>> www-apache/mo
fined set of approved EAPIs set and updated by the
eclass maintainer in order to not require an audit by each ebuild
maintainer inheriting the eclass. This was discussed on the last council
meeting but did not get to a vote.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-k
016-09-18-wg-meeting.txt
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 09/19/2016 10:00 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Kristian Fiskerstrand schrieb:
>>> Why are those ebuilds not live? If upstream doesn't do real releases and
>>> can't even be bothered to tag the commit that marks a release, then why
>>> are you (or som
ct because live ebuilds can't be keyworded, so snapshot is
the correct way to do it.
That said; I'm not sure if it makes sense to include this sort of
scripts in the Gentoo tree instead of a separate git repo e.g for the
project.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://
On 09/05/2016 08:54 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 09/05/2016 04:45 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>> On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 11:43 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>> On 08/24/2016 11:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> Most
ned things in tree if nobody want to
take the maintainer burden of it.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
talk about it and decide on
whether we're sufficiently informed for a vote at the meeting.
References:
[RFC: Eclasses and EAPI]
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/87e630b9da724c5c59060608aba596a9
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
On 09/06/2016 03:38 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 06/09/16 14:35, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 09/06/2016 03:19 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I believe you'
On 09/06/2016 03:19 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>> I believe you're overthinking it, if we make it a guideline to include a
>> section of the eclass (as many already have) that does e.
On 09/06/2016 12:44 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:03:36 +0200
> Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 18:13:20 +0200
>> Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm wondering wh
On 09/05/2016 04:45 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 11:43 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 08/24/2016 11:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> Most Gnome team member are not willing to keep maintaining cinnamon
>>> ebu
On 09/02/2016 07:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 18:13:20 +0200
>> Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Devs,
>>>
>>> I'm
mozilla.org/pipermail/tb-planning/2016-January/004357.html
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
; Please share your thoughts about pros, cons, and viability of each option.
>
> I'd certainly be willing to help with testing and making progress on
> these, and I could possibly use a fast machine as a tinderbox for this.
>
> That also means help is welcome.
>
> Paw
aintaining it through proxy-maint for a while is
a good way to get introduced to workflow and getting reviewed while
learning the steps.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
e time I'm not sufficiently familiar with
gnome-packages etc that I'd want to do it on my own.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
unbundling as
> the
> Chromium ebuild for things that _can_ be unbundled. Some dependencies cannot
> be unbundled for various reasons (modifications, reliance on internal
> headers,
> etc.)
>
A bug should still be filed and used as a tracker for upstream bug
reports to unbun
On 08/15/2016 04:49 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 08/15/2016 04:19 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> I'm very much for this as well. Themaintainer should be able to
>> stabilize on all arches after the timeout. That would solve the primary
>> concern I have about th
y related or fixing a
known bug, it can cause regression for stable users without much gain.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08/15/2016 03:15 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
>> Could you please elaborate a bit? In particular from perspective of (i)
>> integration into current workflow, (ii) complexity in applicatio
ome kind of minimal web app/API would probably be better.
Could you please elaborate a bit? In particular from perspective of (i)
integration into current workflow, (ii) complexity in application
maintenance/hosting (iii) cost/benefit considerations
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
>
--
On 08/14/2016 11:35 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> I've volunteered to chair such as working group. If you want to
> participate in it please respond to this thread. Additionally I've set
> up #gentoo-wg-stable as a place of coordination.
we now have an alias wg-sta...@gentoo.org
e...and subsequently put off and/or forget to do ;)
>
Better than developers marking it fixed without it hitting stable as too
many are doing today.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08/14/2016 11:45 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 23:35:58 +0200
> Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> During the latest Council meeting it was determined to set up a new
>> Working Group to come up with recommendations for improving the sta
to the council with the summary of these discussions.
I've volunteered to chair such as working group. If you want to
participate in it please respond to this thread. Additionally I've set
up #gentoo-wg-stable as a place of coordination.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp
ything blows up, I'll take full
> responsibility.
>
I agree with Ulm on this one, having a separate dir and LD_LIBRARY_PATH
seems like the cleanest solution for this.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ers aren't
expected to have seen all the news items, so that alone isn't enough
until the documentation is updated, and docs can't be updated until the
change has happened itself as itself would be a mismatch.
What is the expected gain from such a change?
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate
ys is a discussion on which
architectures should qualify for security support to begin with, given
stabilization times etc the list for discussion would likely start off
with only amd64.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5
an wanted manpower to write
up the GLSAs vs scouting, wrangling and auditing work.
> I believe we already have a security severity classification system of
> some kind with targeted response times, so maybe we can tie policy
> into that?
Makes sense
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP c
er thread, need to discuss that within the
project first (I'm not lead, but have requested a team meeting already)
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t would make a great deal of sense in
general and is on overtime. I will stop the discussion of any specifics
on that at this point though, as it hasn't been discussed within the
project which in any case is a natural first step to things.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://po
council approval of special projects as lead is an important factor,
maybe we should rather also approve security leads?
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 06/17/2016 07:05 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 18:46:16 +0200
> Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> On 06/17/2016 06:41 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand
>>> <k...@gentoo
On 06/17/2016 03:58 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:14:44 +0200
>> Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/16/2016 03:02 PM
On 06/17/2016 03:48 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
>> On 06/17/2016 02:18 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>>> If I'm a maintainer and I resolve a bug, how do I know if I should
>>> m
On 06/17/2016 03:02 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> Can you clarify what you mean by that?
>>
>> If I have a tracker with 47 resolved blockers, how do I know which of
>> those made it to stable?
>>
>
> The once that are RESOLVED FIXED, before they
On 06/17/2016 02:18 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
>> On 06/17/2016 01:50 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> It might be better to just close the original bug, and then open a new
>>> STABLER
the history of the issue available for the
stabilization, filtering it out based on keyword is easy to do in saved
search.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: Ope
m if there's not a big need for that.
>
I can imagine situations where URL field is used for bug description
itself, and as such isn't available for use for commit message. I'd
imagine this to be more a "see also" style field
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate re
On 06/16/2016 11:57 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> How about introducing a state that explicitly means "resolved but needs
> stabilization"?
We already have InVCS keyword for this
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94C
e. But I
currently make use of the UNCONFIRMED / CONFIRMED distinction as well ,
CONFIRMED often in relation to UPSTREAM keyword that I'm not actively
working on myself
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60
On 06/16/2016 03:19 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> I currently set InVCS for pending-stable fixes in conjunction with the
> IN_PROGRESS state. I would like to keep InVCS at least.
Exactly
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFD
s to work with. I oppose a
change to that behavior, although I would like to see it being used more
consistently as it seems quite a few developers are neglecting the
stable tree.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7
On 06/12/2016 04:57 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 06/12/2016 05:53 AM, james wrote:
>
>> I only see (2) posts in the ML, so is it active?
>
> It is a new ML, but it is active to the extent that you should expect to
> see discussion on it
>
To elaborate o
On 06/12/2016 05:53 AM, james wrote:
> On 06/11/2016 08:29 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 06/12/2016 04:20 AM, james wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there an archive to this wonderful list? I cannot seem to find the
>>> archive?
>>
>> https://bugs.gen
On 06/12/2016 04:20 AM, james wrote:
>
> Is there an archive to this wonderful list? I cannot seem to find the
> archive?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581370
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109
ntain a few packages in their own area of interest.
There is also a gentoo-proxy-ma...@lists.gentoo.org list for these kinds
of questions that is likely more appropriate
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7
dev-util/nsis curretly has no maintainer. It has a [critical security
bug filed against it]. Does anyone want to pick it up? if not we'll
start a last rite process for it.
[critical security bug filed against it]
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568398
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP
On 06/04/2016 09:53 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 06/04/2016 03:45 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>
>> would a REQUIRED_USE in newer versions make sense to force the new use
>> flag for people upgrading as a deprecation period?
>>
>
> You mean like requiri
On 06/04/2016 09:50 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 04/06/16 20:45, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> would a REQUIRED_USE in newer versions make sense to force the new use
>> flag for people upgrading as a deprecation period?
>>
> What's the migration path/timeline look like
On 06/04/2016 09:45 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 06/04/2016 09:39 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> On 06/04/2016 03:30 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
>>> The existing use description might be considered slightly confusing,
>>> potentially ..
>>>
>>
nable webp support for GD in php-7.x
>
>
would a REQUIRED_USE in newer versions make sense to force the new use
flag for people upgrading as a deprecation period?
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618
Due to bug #584246 the following packages have been dropped to
maintainer-needed:
app-doc/cppman
app-text/grip
app-text/cherrytree
dev-db/sqlitestudio
dev-python/path-and-address
sys-apps/miller
sys-process/nmon
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks
On 05/23/2016 11:17 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> Just when I saw it I though "Nice, this is waaay better then the
> standard 'you did wrong, try again' ".
give a man a fish and he has food for a day, teach a man to fish and he
has food for a lifetime
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Ope
s. What is the
> problem with adding it to eutils?
Is the use-case sufficiently common for it to be sourced in all ebuilds
inheriting eutils?
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e
> add the keywords to the main repo? Overlays may be a fine alternative.
>
> Just my 2¢. Thanks for bringing this up, it's a topic I didn't know was
> a concern.
>
References:
[covered in the devmanual]
https://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
author is responsible for all
behavior of the commit.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
iles installed to ${D}etc/init.d/ and throw a warning if their
> shebang is "#!/sbin/runscript"
>
A repoman check is a much saner approach, I'm not convinced there is
sufficient need for this change to begin with, in particular to start
touching a wide range of packages. Breaki
tual user
interaction, but as long as we keep servers in good shape I'm not
necessarily too worried about those, and it is possibly easier to spot
than a miscalculation in a statistics library
Maybe a workshop to write more testsuites is a fruitful event at some
point in time..
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Ope
more deeply integrates when
considering security.
References:
[0]
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/f74961c953d5ffedd1af9a67fdda6407
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
D
the main portage
> release. This will have several advantages.
>
Sounds reasonable
- --
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEBCgAG
h git
commit, additionally this will cause issues with retirement and
similar situations (certificate revocation, subkey rotations, expiries).
Git is a good tool for revision control (if used properly), but it is
not a panacea
- --
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyser
[Sent from my iPad, as it is not a secured device there are no cryptographic
keys on this device, meaning this message is sent without an OpenPGP signature.
In general you should *not* rely on any information sent over such an unsecure
channel, if you find any information controversial or
ub.com/gentoo/libressl/wiki/Transition-plan#fixing-unstable-arch-ebuilds
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
emd in their flags?
>
Exactly, in particular since this isn't officially supported as
standalone to begin with it can only help with stability of systems to
change the default order.
- --
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109
d I did.
>
> The non-systemd profiles should have eudev as default.
>
+1 from me on this change of default order.
- --
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
-BEGIN PGP SIG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/27/2016 03:17 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand
> <k...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Advanced notice, please
>
> Committed 2016-01-27-upgrading-to-apache-2_4 to ne
ws item, then file the stabilization bugs so that people at
> least have advance notice?
Advanced notice, please
- --
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
---
complications when issues are detected, in
particular security relevant ones. Attaching a CSV of bugs assigned to
security with maintainer-needed CCed.
e.g app-text/htmltidy has multiple reverse dependecies but is itself
maintainer needed with at least two vulnerabilities (bug 561452)
--
Kristian Fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/21/2016 06:30 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:25:21 +0100 Kristian Fiskerstrand
> <k...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> However it can cause complications when issues are detected, in
>> partic
new maintainers for its packages.
>
> net-irc/irssi: swegener@
I expect that this is actually actively maintained, but if not I'm
interested in stepping up and taking it.
- --
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 303
king over this one
- --
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWj+gFAAoJECULev7WN52FRmEH+QHMG+VkHu4yymmlZIekXOPj
NOBSGPtqml48bs9smV2SByaI7x9DzpIsEz97ZaErOV7eXK
possible to have a conditional approach where either one can be used,
or maybe set the new variable/defin if the old one is used?
- --
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/04/2016 09:41 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 01/04/2016 01:26 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> Hi!
>
> Such a change should really be avoided if possible. Would it be
> possible to have a conditional approach wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/04/2016 02:30 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 01/04/2016 09:41 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 01/04/2016 01:26 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>>> Hi!
>
>
>
>
>> Such a change should
is more from a
security point of view than performance, and the question makes
perfect sense.
- --
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/28/2015 07:35 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand
> <k...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> On 28 Dec 2015, at 15:58, James Le Cuirot <ch...@gentoo.org>
>>> wrote:
&g
[Sent from my iPad, as it is not a secured device there are no cryptographic
keys on this device, meaning this message is sent without an OpenPGP signature.
In general you should *not* rely on any information sent over such an unsecure
channel, if you find any information controversial or
-expected send a
response and request a signed confirmation]
> On 27 Dec 2015, at 23:49, Andrew Savchenko <birc...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:21:37 +0100 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>>
...
>
>> I'm trying to reclaim
-expected send a
response and request a signed confirmation]
> On 28 Dec 2015, at 16:07, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>
> The main issue is key storage, though. For signatures you can use a dedicated
> signing subkey, however you get in problem
s?) linking to the GLSA. Even a blog
in private blog as part of Planet Gentoo would likely work (but official
blog would work nicer).
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
a new project.
References:
[0] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Crypto
- --
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
dn't be in sbin in the first place but in bin. In any
case; I don't see any good reason to change the traditional behavior
of sbin only being in path for root.
- --
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/25/2015 08:20 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 11/25/2015 09:12 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> As recently discussed herds are migrating to projects, and in
>> that connection we've now set
was installing things when I inherited it from the previous
> maintainer.
>
> If William's PATH proposal is not implemented, I would be happy to
> move it all to /bin if so desired. Just file a bug.
If moving it in the first place, wouldn't it go to /usr/bin as not
being essential
ook forwards to
and Gentoo Keys project is working hard on.
- --
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWOjIcAAoJECULev7WN52FivEH/RssmJdQLug2E4B0ZUMUBDum
fp5
o and other tools separate, so the demo
> is running again plain anongit (and that seems to work fine).
>
>
The way I see it, keeping review and committing/pushing separate is a
good thing, and removes a lot of the concerns about hosting a review
platform as it is sufficient with read-a
201 - 300 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
