, so it's up to him. ;)
It'd be delighted to see fox-1.2.6 removed (along with 1.0, but that's
another story), but it's ia64's call to update their keywords or drop
'em (1.2.6-r2 is last stable). I've been told that this is being worked
on, so don't worry :)
--
Regards, Matti Bickel
Homepage: http
around.
We should keep it that way.
--
Kind Regards, Matti Bickel
Homepage: http://www.rateu.de
Encrypted/Signed Email preferred
pgp4PizX6ib5c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
# Matti Bickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] (28 Feb 2007)
# Fails to compile against lua-5.1.1, no upstream release for 3 years
# net-irc/nikibot
If i'm mistaken and someone needs it urgently, please give it some love.
Otherwise it will vanish in 30 days.
--
MfG, Matti Bickel
Homepage: http://www.rateu.de
clear what
happens if they fail (not implying they do...)
Uh, such a lenghty email, hope my point comes across:
the sec team does a good job, imho afaik :-)
--
Regards, Matti Bickel
Homepage: http://www.rateu.de
Encrypted/Signed Email preferred
pgpaTCxkTupts.pgp
Description: PGP signature
stable keywords from those
ebuilds, though. I'd like to keep the p.mask for this, maybe with mips
and other known to lag behind arches unmasking the ebuilds in question.
(That would at least say we're aware that these versions are vulnerable
but can't upgrade yet)
--
Regards, Matti Bickel
Homepage
)
Scheduled removal date: 19 Feb 2007
--
MfG, Matti Bickel
Homepage: http://www.rateu.de
Encrypted/Signed Email preferred
pgpU9Ujo3sg6X.pgp
Description: PGP signature
. That adds complexity and thus increases time spent on bugzi w/o
actual benefit for the overall dev-community. I'd rather go w/ posting emerge
--info as a attachment.
--
MfG, Matti Bickel
Homepage: http://www.rateu.de
Encrypted/Signed Email preferred
pgpscnHaz4joo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
could actually see what we're running. Is this still needed or is the
number of ATs small enough to keep that in head-RAM?
Anyways, I agree that posting emerge --info to a highly frequented stable bug
is annoying and should be abolished.
--
MfG, Matti Bickel
Homepage: http://www.rateu.de
Encrypted
Pawe?? Madej [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a common user with ADSL 256kbps all additional data downloaded via
rsync causes longer wait for syncing. If I want to see a changelog i
go to packages.gentoo.org and read it. As i got Gentoo for about 10
months I don't remember if I read Changelog via
Francesco Riosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matti Bickel wrote:
Pawe?? Madej [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a common user with ADSL 256kbps all additional data downloaded via
rsync causes longer wait for syncing. If I want to see a changelog i
go to packages.gentoo.org and read it. As i got
Ingo Bormuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-11-25 15:46, kang wrote:
This whole thing give me some idea. Now, it changes the design a bit and
probably no one will listen, but, what if thoses purple boxes where to
be replaced by the bottom link stuff ;)
The bottom links which are
Thierry Carrez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant Goodyear wrote:
Corey Shields wrote: [Fri Nov 18 2005, 10:42:30PM CST]
Still screwed up. Lesson learned, make friends with a majority of the
council, write and propose a glep the day before a meeting and then push it
through. wow. sounds
Grant Goodyear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thierry Carrez wrote: [Mon Nov 14 2005, 03:09:24AM CST]
Voting
- GLEP 41 (requested by Homer Parker)
My recollection was that GLEP 41 was rejected at the last
meeting, although a revised GLEP could be resubmitted for approval. As
far as I know,
Wernfried Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Coming from the user side (forums) i fully agree. Common sense among
the users always used to be:
arch: stable
~arch: testing
p.mask: broken
And this is what it should be IMHO.
The solutions so far seem to introduce only a new testing layer, already
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
