On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:35:57 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> ...and the git hook would've rejected them because they aren't signed
> by a Gentoo developer.
Fair enough. I suspect in line with the other comments, it would be
optimal if said commit hook mentioned something along the lines of:
"Perha
W dniu czw, 12.07.2018 o godzinie 15∶52 +1200, użytkownik Kent Fredric
napisał:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 10:40:22 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail addresses
> > for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority o
W dniu wto, 10.07.2018 o godzinie 09∶38 -0400, użytkownik kuzetsa
napisał:
> > The only issue I see is that of slight complications on handling the
> > different addresses for author and commit, that's all that comes to
> > mind.
> >
> >
> > Mart
> >
>
> I think authorship is a good point / dis
On July 11, 2018 8:52:56 PM PDT, Kent Fredric wrote:
>Standard git tools will not attempt to even *change* these commits even
>with an explicit rebase, because Git will detect that nothing needs to
>change, and will no-op the rebase, leaving Committer and Signatures
>intact, degrading to a fast-fo
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 10:40:22 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail addresses
>> for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of
>> developers is using their
On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 10:40:22 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail addresses
> for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of
> developers is using their @gentoo.org e-mail addresses. However, a few
> developers are u
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 09:38:27 -0400
kuzetsa wrote:
> Authorship was never shown in dev-timeline for addresses
> which aren't @gentoo.org anyway. That's a separate issue,
> so this policy change shouldn't affect proxy-maint?
Then why does the dev timeline show me starting at Oct 2015, but git
show
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:14 AM kuzetsa wrote:
>
> Authorship was brought up by: [ Mart Raudsepp ]
>
> It's germane, and wanting clarity doesn't hurt:
Sure, and it was answered by mgorny 17 hours before your post,
pointing to the original email which did in fact specifically
reference the commi
On 07/10/2018 09:44 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:38 AM kuzetsa wrote:
>>
>> I think authorship is a good point / distinction, Mart.
>>
>> Authorship was never shown in dev-timeline for addresses
>> which aren't @gentoo.org anyway. That's a separate issue,
>> so this policy c
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:38 AM kuzetsa wrote:
>
> I think authorship is a good point / distinction, Mart.
>
> Authorship was never shown in dev-timeline for addresses
> which aren't @gentoo.org anyway. That's a separate issue,
> so this policy change shouldn't affect proxy-maint?
>
Might I sugge
On 07/09/2018 06:29 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval, E, 09.07.2018 kell 10:40, kirjutas Michał Górny:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail
>> addresses
>> for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of
>> developers is using their
W dniu pon, 09.07.2018 o godzinie 22∶12 +0200, użytkownik Manuel Rüger
napisał:
> On 09.07.2018 10:40, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail addresses
> > for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of
> > developers is
On 09.07.2018 10:40, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail addresses
> for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of
> developers is using their @gentoo.org e-mail addresses. However, a few
> developers are using some other
On Mon, 2018-07-09 at 10:40 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail
> addresses
> for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of
> developers is using their @gentoo.org e-mail addresses. However, a
> few
> developers are
On July 9, 2018 4:40:22 AM EDT, "Michał Górny" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail addresses
>for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of
>developers is using their @gentoo.org e-mail addresses. However, a few
>developers are using
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 09.07.2018 kell 10:40, kirjutas Michał Górny:
> Hi,
>
> We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail
> addresses
> for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of
> developers is using their @gentoo.org e-mail addresses. However, a
> few
> d
On 07/09/2018 10:40 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Therefore, I'd like to start enforcing (at the level of the hook
> verifying signatures) that all commits made to gentoo.git (and other
> repositories requiring dev signatures) are made using @gentoo.org e-mail
> address (for committer field).
Sounds
Hi,
We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail addresses
for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of
developers is using their @gentoo.org e-mail addresses. However, a few
developers are using some other addresses.
Using n...@gentoo.org e-mail addresses ge
18 matches
Mail list logo
