On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:17:31 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:14:11 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
A more reasonable approach would be for the Council to permit the
tree to contain at most 6 wrong lines at any given time. That
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 20:58:46 +0200
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:17:31 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:14:11 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
A more reasonable approach would be for the Council
Tom Wijsman:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 20:58:46 +0200
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:17:31 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:14:11 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
A more reasonable approach would be for
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:35:13 +
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Tom Wijsman:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 20:58:46 +0200
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:17:31 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:14:11 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:10:40PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
... to genkernel repository for:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
I'll p.mask it on amd64 profiles if noone replies soon :(
My excuse is AFK
On 31/05/14 22:41, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:10:40PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
... to genkernel repository for:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
I'll p.mask it on amd64
On May 31, 2014 8:42 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:10:40PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
... to genkernel repository for:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:46:35PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
The patch in the bug is not enough. Notice
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828#c13
Those should be reseted to too.
Read what I applied, I did set it to .
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 08:51:39PM +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
On May 31, 2014 8:42 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:10:40PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
... to genkernel
On 31/05/14 23:00, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:46:35PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
The patch in the bug is not enough. Notice
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828#c13
Those should be reseted to too.
Read what I applied, I did set it to .
Thanks, looks
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
No, I don't agree that kernel configs belong to kernel packages. In
general, barring the crazy option explosion, these are meant to be stock
working configs that should in combination with ANY kernel package,
produce
On Sat, 31 May 2014 22:42:17 +0100
Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Robin H. Johnson
robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
No, I don't agree that kernel configs belong to kernel packages.
In general, barring the crazy option explosion, these are meant to
be
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 11:16:35PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 31/05/14 23:00, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:46:35PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
The patch in the bug is not enough. Notice
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828#c13
Those should be
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:42:17PM +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
No, I don't agree that kernel configs belong to kernel packages. In
general, barring the crazy option explosion, these are meant to be stock
working
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
... to genkernel repository for:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
I'll p.mask it on amd64 profiles if noone replies soon :(
- Samuli
On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:10:40 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
... to genkernel repository for:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
I'll p.mask it on amd64 profiles if noone replies soon :(
On 30/05/14 19:10, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:10:40 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
... to genkernel repository for:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
I'll p.mask it on
On 30/05/14 19:16, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 30/05/14 19:10, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:10:40 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
... to genkernel repository for:
Tom Wijsman:
Please no p.mask for a single line being wrong...
That's nonsense. The amount of wrong lines doesn't matter. A single
wrong line in the kernel can break your whole system as well.
Please p.mask (or patch) immediately. There is no point in waiting.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/05/14 18:10, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Please no p.mask for a single line being wrong...
So if an ebuild does rm -rf / --no-preserve-root, it should not be
masked as long as it does not break the command into several lines?
- --
Alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2014 11:10 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
... to genkernel repository for:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
I'll p.mask it on amd64 profiles if noone
On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:26:38 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'll give it 48 hours and then p.mask it.
Genkernel itself does work; so, there is no point to masking it.
I won't be fixing it.
Someone else here can, but wait for someone like Pacho to look into the
activity of
В Fri, 30 May 2014 18:10:40 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org пишет:
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
... to genkernel repository for:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
I'll p.mask it on amd64 profiles if noone replies soon :(
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:26:38 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'll give it 48 hours and then p.mask it.
Genkernel itself does work; so, there is no point to masking it.
I like the message the
On Fri, 30 May 2014 16:34:09 +
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Tom Wijsman:
Please no p.mask for a single line being wrong...
That's nonsense. The amount of wrong lines doesn't matter. A single
wrong line in the kernel can break your whole system as well.
Please p.mask (or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:43:14 +0200
Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 30/05/14 18:10, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Please no p.mask for a single line being wrong...
So if an ebuild does rm -rf / --no-preserve-root, [...]
Does Genkernel do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/05/14 19:11, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Well, let's just mask the whole tree; there are wrong lines
everywhere.
It is not a matter of quantity but severity.
$ echo Dnoe
$ rm -rf / --no-preserve-root
Same quantity, somewhat different severity.
-
On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:11:54 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Well, let's just mask the whole tree; there are wrong lines
everywhere.
A more reasonable approach would be for the Council to permit the tree
to contain at most 6 wrong lines at any given time. That way any
developer
On Fri, 30 May 2014 20:51:09 +0400
Alexander Tsoy alexan...@tsoy.me wrote:
В Fri, 30 May 2014 18:10:40 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org пишет:
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails,
pings, ... to genkernel repository for:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:14:42 +0200
Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 30/05/14 19:11, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Well, let's just mask the whole tree; there are wrong lines
everywhere.
It is not a matter of quantity but severity.
$
On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:14:11 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:11:54 +0200
A more reasonable approach would be for the Council to permit the tree
to contain at most 6 wrong lines at any given time. That way any
developer wishing to add a new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/05/14 01:14 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:11:54 +0200 Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Well, let's just mask the whole tree; there are wrong lines
everywhere.
A more reasonable approach would be for the Council
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/05/14 19:18, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Well, this thread's problem is not severe at all; thus, no need to
mask.
I disagree. I'm with ssuominen. Do with that information what you will...
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:26:38 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I have no plans in inserting my name to genkernel's ChangeLog,
and I've done my best to contact people (nobody cares)
Only initramfs tool I
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Ben Kohler bkoh...@gmail.com wrote:
As nice at it sounds to just DROP these configs, that option is not really
feasible considering the way we currently use genkernel in our handbook.
Relying on the kernel's own defconfig, genkernel all will NOT produce the
configs should have never gotten into genkernel in the first place.
it's each kernel pkg (or even version) that owns a valid config of
itself.
I am part of genkernel@ but I have no will nor time to fix it. And
when I have, I'd rather work on genkernel-next, that comes with a much
more readable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2014 01:39 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
configs should have never gotten into genkernel in the first place.
it's each kernel pkg (or even version) that owns a valid config of
itself.
I am part of genkernel@ but I have no will nor time to
On Fri, 30 May 2014 13:32:54 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Ben Kohler bkoh...@gmail.com wrote:
As nice at it sounds to just DROP these configs, that option is not
really feasible considering the way we currently use genkernel in
our handbook.
On Fri, 30 May 2014 13:22:54 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
While all this bickering is nice to read, what is really needed is:
1. Somebody needs to step up and actually fix genkernel.
And that's why we await the maintainers' or undertakers' response. With
undertakers, I mean
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Good idea, we really could use some kind of kernel seeds in the Portage
tree; if someone is willing to maintain them, knowing that Pappy has
maintained them for years and spoke about it it seems like hard work.
Remember
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:21:20 +0200
Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 30/05/14 19:18, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Well, this thread's problem is not severe at all; thus, no need to
mask.
I disagree. I'm with ssuominen. Do with that
On Fri, 30 May 2014 13:08:50 -0500
Ben Kohler bkoh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Good idea, we really could use some kind of kernel seeds in the
Portage tree; if someone is willing to maintain them, knowing that
Pappy has
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 04:34:09PM +, hasufell wrote:
Tom Wijsman:
Please no p.mask for a single line being wrong...
That's nonsense. The amount of wrong lines doesn't matter. A single
wrong line in the kernel can break your whole system as well.
Please p.mask (or patch)
Sven Vermeulen:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 04:34:09PM +, hasufell wrote:
Tom Wijsman:
Please no p.mask for a single line being wrong...
That's nonsense. The amount of wrong lines doesn't matter. A single
wrong line in the kernel can break your whole system as well.
Please p.mask (or
Am Freitag, 30. Mai 2014, 19:14:11 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:11:54 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Well, let's just mask the whole tree; there are wrong lines
everywhere.
A more reasonable approach would be for the Council to permit the tree
to contain
On Fri May 30 22:30:32 2014 Sven Vermeulen sw...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 04:34:09PM +, hasufell wrote:
Tom Wijsman:
Please no p.mask for a single line being wrong...
That's nonsense. The amount of wrong lines doesn't matter. A single
wrong line in the
46 matches
Mail list logo
