Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-06 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Sunday 04 March 2007, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote: Hubert Mercier wrote: That's probably why it is so hard to renew developer pool. Why do people keep repeating this myth? As kloeri pointed out, developer base keeps growing constantly. Which is a problem, because the growth without

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-05 Thread Michael Cummings
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 22:05:43 +0100 Lionel Bouton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I followed this discussion for what seems ages now. I'm not a dev, just a user a little sad with the mood on gentoo-dev so feel free to ignore me... Lionel, don't feel sad. the rest of us are fine, jolly even (though i

[gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
I hope this does not generate many if any replies. Some might seen Daniel as a deserter, sell out for leaving much less going to work for M$, and so on. Granted while he was gone, many things have changed. I am sure he is trying to catch up on all that. I am also sure he is appreciative and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 14:15:36 -0500 William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I we can cut him some slack, and we should all have some level of respect, at least in public, towards the father, creator, and founder of Gentoo. What kind of response do you think anyone else would have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
Maybe if Ciaran recognized his past faults, begged pardon and promised to be kinder from now and on, everything would be easier for everyone, everything would calm down. Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 14:15:36 -0500 William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I we can cut

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 19:23 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: What kind of response do you think anyone else would have received had they started repeatedly attacking a project when they didn't even know what that project was, repeatedly tried to interfere with the management of a project when

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 04 March 2007, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: Would that project even exist if it weren't for Daniel's past efforts and contributions? if you want to go that route, why dont we all get down on our knees and praise the GNU project for everything they've done, over and over again (which

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Daniel Robbins
Will, I appreciate the spirit of what you posted, but I want to be clear that I do not expect or request any special treatment, so I don't agree with you. We should *always* have some level of respect of gentoo-dev, regardless of who we're talking to. -Daniel On 3/4/07, William L. Thomson Jr.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Daniel Robbins
I never said I was informed :) It was helpful to have some things confirmed by people other than Ciaran. -Daniel On 3/4/07, William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 19:23 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: What kind of response do you think anyone else would have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Daniel Robbins
I agree, the post was well intentioned but as I said before I can't agree with what was suggested. On 3/4/07, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 04 March 2007, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: Would that project even exist if it weren't for Daniel's past efforts and contributions?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Daniel Robbins
Yep, I agree. Thanks everyone for being tolerant of my confusion and disruption while I look for a way to remove Ciaran from gentoo-dev. -Daniel On 3/4/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 14:15:36 -0500 William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I we can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:14:14 -0700 Daniel Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It was helpful to have some things confirmed by people other than Ciaran. So now you're calling me a liar too? If you meant something else by that remark, please explain, because I'm having a very hard time coming up with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Fernando J. Pereda
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:17:03PM -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote: Yep, I agree. Thanks everyone for being tolerant of my confusion and disruption while I look for a way to remove Ciaran from gentoo-dev. Stop it. You don't like him, fine. I personally don't like you, no problem. And many people

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Daniel Robbins
That's actually a very good idea. I definitely don't want to be associated with this project. -Daniel On 3/4/07, Fernando J. Pereda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:17:03PM -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote: Yep, I agree. Thanks everyone for being tolerant of my confusion and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Daniel Robbins
C'mon, I am not calling you a liar. I just don't always take everything you say at face value. Call it a trust issue. -Daniel On 3/4/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:14:14 -0700 Daniel Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It was helpful to have some things

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Bryan Østergaard
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:46:38PM -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote: C'mon, I am not calling you a liar. I just don't always take everything you say at face value. Call it a trust issue. -Daniel On 3/4/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:14:14 -0700 Daniel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
Daniel Robbins wrote: Yep, I agree. Thanks everyone for being tolerant of my confusion and disruption while I look for a way to remove Ciaran from gentoo-dev. Daniel, Are you saying that all of your comments regarding PMS were made solely for the purpose of removing Ciaran from the gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread David Shakaryan
Fernando J. Pereda wrote: Please go back to your hacking and improve Gentoo. You just can't 'remove Ciaran from gentoo-dev', live with it, or leave Gentoo if you don't like the way we do things now. I agree. Daniel, you need to accept the fact that you no longer have the power to do any

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Lionel Bouton
Ciaran McCreesh wrote the following on 04.03.2007 21:26 : On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:14:14 -0700 Daniel Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It was helpful to have some things confirmed by people other than Ciaran. So now you're calling me a liar too? [...] I followed this discussion

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Daniel Robbins
No, I did not say that _all_ of my comments were solely for that purpose. However, I personally would not stay subscribed to gentoo-dev with Ciaran on the list. I think there are others who have the same perspective and tend to either ignore -dev or have unsubscribed. Ciaran is also clearly

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Stuart Herbert
Hi Daniel, On 3/4/07, Daniel Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just as a note, I've resigned as a Gentoo dev so I'm going to at some point today unsubscribe from -dev and stop replying to -dev emails. -Daniel Thanks for trying, but Gentoo just has too many folks who don't understand the issue

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Daniel Robbins
Hi Stu, I think you're right regarding the current lack of shared culture, as you put it, and the lack of will to do anything about it. As for what I'm doing next with my time, let me just say that Ciaran need not fear for his personal safety :) Other than that, we will see. I'm open to ideas.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Alexander Færøy
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 09:51:34PM +, Stuart Herbert wrote: What do you plan on doing next with your time? How cute, but please take this in private and not in the list. Honestly, we do not care... -- Alexander Færøy Bugday Lead Alpha/IA64/MIPS Architecture Teams User Relations, Quality

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Jakub Moc
Alexander Færøy napsal(a): On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 09:51:34PM +, Stuart Herbert wrote: What do you plan on doing next with your time? How cute, but please take this in private and not in the list. Honestly, we do not care... I certainly do care - more than I could ever care about all

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Daniel Robbins
Be careful, I'm now a Gentoo user, and you're on userrel. Userrel shouldn't launch gratuitious insults at Gentoo users. Thank you for not caring. -Daniel On 3/4/07, Alexander Færøy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 09:51:34PM +, Stuart Herbert wrote: What do you plan on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Hubert Mercier
Hi, recruitment was too focused on technical skills Yes, this is my point of view too. It can even be discouraging to people wishing to help with gentoo. That's probably why it is so hard to renew developer pool. I have been involved in gentoo for nearly 5 years now (2 officialy), but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Hubert Mercier
Hi, recruitment was too focused on technical skills Yes, this is my point of view too. It can even be discouraging to people wishing to help with gentoo. That's probably why it is so hard to renew developer pool. I have been involved in gentoo for nearly 5 years now (2 officialy), but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
Daniel Robbins wrote: However, I personally would not stay subscribed to gentoo-dev with Ciaran on the list. So, instead of quietly un-subscribing you launch in a huge flamefest, by hijacking an important discussion thread. I think there are others who have the same perspective and tend to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

2007-03-04 Thread Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
Hubert Mercier wrote: That's probably why it is so hard to renew developer pool. Why do people keep repeating this myth? As kloeri pointed out, developer base keeps growing constantly. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list