On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 10:28 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:46 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> >
> > > And how exactly does this help us in the event of say the OSL burning
> > > down or the GNi suffering flooding? :)
> > >
> >
> > Well, we're
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 19:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 26 March 2007, bret curtis wrote:
> > Only wimps use tape backup: *real **men* just upload their important
> > stuff on *ftp*, and let the rest of the world mirror it. -- LT :1996
> actually, i wonder if this would be useful ...
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:12:17 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have not implemented any policy at the instruction of anyone.
>
> We have not implemented any policy under the threat of removal of
> services.
I'm pleased to hear that. To be honest I assumed that was exactly wh
On Monday 26 March 2007, bret curtis wrote:
> Only wimps use tape backup: *real **men* just upload their important
> stuff on *ftp*, and let the rest of the world mirror it. -- LT :1996
actually, i wonder if this would be useful ... we set up a master backup
server where we post raw svn/cvs/etc..
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Monday 26 March 2007, Dale wrote:
[snip]
Actually the situation is not that hypothetical. Some years ago the datacenter
of the University of Twente (The Netherlands) was set to fire by an angry
systems administrator. The building housed among other infrastructure v
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 00:22 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Monday 26 March 2007, Dale wrote:
> > Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:46 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> > >> And how exactly does this help us in the event of say the OSL burning
> > >> down or the GNi sufferi
On Monday 26 March 2007, Dale wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:46 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> >> And how exactly does this help us in the event of say the OSL burning
> >> down or the GNi suffering flooding? :)
> >
> > Well, we're on the second floor of the data
On Monday 26 March 2007, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru wrote:
> For anyone, I can host a mirror for gentoo.org. Just contact me.
we're not worried about mirrors, we're worried about the core infrastructure
which really cant be mirrored
if you're offering to host a web node mirror though, please open
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 16:39 +0100, Richard Brown wrote:
> Hi vapier, thanks for pointing this out. Am I wrong to assume from your
> responses in this thread to ciaranm's "hypothetical" case that the
> current council have not implemented any policy at the instruction of an
> external company or org
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:47:30 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think this whole idea is a moot point anyways ... go visit the
> Gentoo Foundation web site and see Chapter 2 Section 5
> -mike
> Gentoo is independent
> Gentoo will never be reigned by a company nor be dictated by a
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:46 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
>
>> And how exactly does this help us in the event of say the OSL burning
>> down or the GNi suffering flooding? :)
>>
>
> Well, we're on the second floor of the data center which has a quite
> large ba
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 11:32 +, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru wrote:
> > And how exactly does this help us in the event of say the OSL burning
> > down or the GNi suffering flooding? :)
> For anyone, I can host a mirror for gentoo.org. Just contact me.
It isn't mirrors that we're discussing here.
On Sunday 25 March 2007 21:46, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 16:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 24 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> > > It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being
> > > dependent upon a single sponsor or corporat
On Sunday 25 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 16:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > i think this whole idea is a moot point anyways ... go visit the
> > > > Gentoo
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:59:41 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 25 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 16:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > i think this whole idea is a moot point anyways ... go visit the
> > > Gentoo Foundation web site and
On Sunday 25 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 16:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i think this whole idea is a moot point anyways ... go visit the Gentoo
> > Foundation web site and see Chapter 2 Section 5
>
> And how exactly does this help us in the event of say th
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 16:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 24 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> > It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being
> > dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. In the interests of
> > keeping Gentoo run by the developers
On Saturday 24 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being
> dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. In the interests of
> keeping Gentoo run by the developers rather than any outside party, how
> about the following addition
On Sunday 25 March 2007, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> > It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being
> > dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. In the interests of
> > keeping Gentoo run by the developers rather than any outside party
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being
dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. In the interests of
keeping Gentoo run by the developers rather than any outside party, how
about the following addition to the Social Contract?
We will
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:35:21 +0200
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gentoo should use whichever basket could fit...
Just because there is a basket that can fit all our eggs should not
prevent us from looking, where possible, for other baskets that would
let us distribute them more evenly
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Which of the following do you think is most likely to happen?
>
> * That Gentoo relicences everything under a proprietary licence
GPL-3 you mean?
> * That Gentoo colludes with Lucifer
Cough...
> * That Gentoo comes under pressure from a sponsor with an agenda
>
> Rem
Dale wrote:
>
> As a lowly user, I agree. Gentoo should not put all its eggs in one basket.
>
Gentoo should use whichever basket could fit...
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 09:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 25 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 04:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Saturday 24 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> > > > It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo f
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: [Sun Mar 25 2007, 07:35:33AM CDT]
> Supposedly >80% of our stuff is hosted in one building, where would we
> find ourselves were this building to building to burn to the ground? Get
> flooded?
Looking through
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/infrastructure/server-specs.xml
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:00:00 -0400
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 25 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>
>>> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
i dont see why this is required ? ignoring the fact that the
wo
On Sunday 25 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:00:00 -0400
>
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > i dont see why this is required ? ignoring the fact that th
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:00:00 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 25 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > i dont see why this is required ? ignoring the fact that the
> > > wording is way too vague to do anything but cause co
On Sunday 25 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i dont see why this is required ? ignoring the fact that the wording
> > is way too vague to do anything but cause confusion and people to
> > spout long winded rants, seems like useless nitpicking abou
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 04:54:33 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i dont see why this is required ? ignoring the fact that the wording
> is way too vague to do anything but cause confusion and people to
> spout long winded rants, seems like useless nitpicking about an issue
> that doe
On Sunday 25 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 04:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 24 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> > > It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being
> > > dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. I
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 04:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 24 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> > It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being
> > dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. In the interests of
> > keeping Gentoo run by the developers
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being
> dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. In the interests of
> keeping Gentoo run by the developers rather than any outside party, how
> about the following addition to the Social Contract?
N
On Saturday 24 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being
> dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. In the interests of
> keeping Gentoo run by the developers rather than any outside party, how
> about the following addition
Darn, there go Piotocorp's plans of buyout...
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being
dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. In the interests of
keeping Gentoo run by the developers rather than any outside party, how
about the following addition to the Social Contract?
We will be run by the Development Co
36 matches
Mail list logo
