Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

2016-09-01 Thread Kent Fredric
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 22:03:37 +0100 "M. J. Everitt" wrote: > [and No, I'm > not volunteering at this point!!!] Well volunteered [future] you. pgpKawF6IrKFy.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

2016-09-01 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 01/09/16 17:58, Duncan wrote: > Martin Vaeth posted on Thu, 01 Sep 2016 05:03:20 + as excerpted: > >> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: >>> Martin Vaeth posted on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:08:17 + as excerpted: >>> Kent Fredric wrote: > I really wish there was

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

2016-09-01 Thread waltdnes
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 03:12:08PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 21:03:34 -0500 > »Q« wrote: > > > says it's in Gentoo overlays, but I don't > > know which ones. > > Tar.bz2's from http://linux.palemoon.org/download/mainline/ are >

[gentoo-dev] Re: chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

2016-09-01 Thread Duncan
Martin Vaeth posted on Thu, 01 Sep 2016 05:03:20 + as excerpted: > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: >> Martin Vaeth posted on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:08:17 + as excerpted: >> >>> Kent Fredric wrote: I really wish there was a way to run ancient firefox with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

2016-08-31 Thread Bill Kenworthy
and it doesn't work on some websites whereas firefox does - the Australian census site for one :( BillK On 09/01/16 13:03, Martin Vaeth wrote: > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: >> Martin Vaeth posted on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:08:17 + as excerpted: >> >>> Kent Fredric

[gentoo-dev] Re: chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

2016-08-31 Thread Martin Vaeth
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Martin Vaeth posted on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:08:17 + as excerpted: > >> Kent Fredric wrote: >>> >>> I really wish there was a way to run ancient firefox with security >>> fixes :( >> >> There's palemoon > > For Linux? Even for gentoo:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

2016-08-31 Thread Kent Fredric
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 21:03:34 -0500 »Q« wrote: > says it's in Gentoo overlays, but I don't > know which ones. Tar.bz2's from http://linux.palemoon.org/download/mainline/ are working nicely for me as a straight download/unpack/run-in-$HOME Much so (

[gentoo-dev] Re: chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

2016-08-31 Thread »Q«
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 01:59:21 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Martin Vaeth posted on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:08:17 + as excerpted: > > There's palemoon > > For Linux? I haven't looked into it personally, but I had read that > palemoon was MS-platform only. So it's news to

[gentoo-dev] Re: chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

2016-08-31 Thread Duncan
Martin Vaeth posted on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:08:17 + as excerpted: > Kent Fredric wrote: >> >> I really wish there was a way to run ancient firefox with security >> fixes :( > > There's palemoon For Linux? I haven't looked into it personally, but I had read that palemoon

[gentoo-dev] Re: chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

2016-08-31 Thread Martin Vaeth
Kent Fredric wrote: > > I really wish there was a way to run ancient firefox with security > fixes :( There's palemoon

Firefox bloat (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1)

2016-08-31 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 08/31/2016 01:28 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 03:46:38 + (UTC) > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > .. > > > I really wish there was a way to run ancient firefox with security > fixes :( > > I've started to really draw hate for all the new stuff they're adding.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

2016-08-31 Thread Kent Fredric
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 03:46:38 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Umm... you mean chromium, not firefox, correct? > Correct, mental bozo bits flipped temporarily ;) > Either way, having to stick with an old and likely vulnerable browser > because the new one won't build isn't a

[gentoo-dev] Re: chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

2016-08-31 Thread Martin Vaeth
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > >> Alexis Ballier wrote: >> >> As opposed to "roll out ffmpeg 3 prematurely" which will break *more* >> than just firefox. > > Umm... you mean chromium, not firefox, correct? I also think so. I have unmasked ffmpeg-3 since several

[gentoo-dev] Re: chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

2016-08-30 Thread Duncan
Kent Fredric posted on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 03:11:07 +1200 as excerpted: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:37:51 +0200 Alexis Ballier > wrote: > >> Most are fixed, but for me this implies that the space for breaking >> users setup is much wider with bundled ffmpeg... > > But that