On 08/23/2010 11:07 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, August 23, 2010 16:21:44 Luca Barbato wrote:
I'd put openrc on freedesktop btw.
we've sort of already settled into the places ... jumping to another place
doesnt gain us much. current infrastructure also already enables all the
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 09:03:41PM -0400, Olivier Cr?te wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
which is trivial to fix and anyone with commit privs could have done. it
certainly doesnt warrant a paniced the sky is falling message.
I think this is a great occasion
On 07/05/2010 03:03 AM, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
which is trivial to fix and anyone with commit privs could have done. it
certainly doesnt warrant a paniced the sky is falling message.
I think this is a great occasion to dump our stupid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/23/2010 04:21 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 07/05/2010 03:03 AM, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
which is trivial to fix and anyone with commit privs could have
done. it
certainly doesnt warrant a
On Monday, August 23, 2010 16:21:44 Luca Barbato wrote:
I'd put openrc on freedesktop btw.
we've sort of already settled into the places ... jumping to another place
doesnt gain us much. current infrastructure also already enables all the
Gentoo devs who wish to contribute
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote:
* Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org schrieb:
What you are saying makes sense for desktop users since they will
likely already have consolekit/policykit/nm-applet installed, and
hence using NetworkManager for all
On 07/05/10 03:03, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
which is trivial to fix and anyone with commit privs could have done. it
certainly doesnt warrant a paniced the sky is falling message.
I think this is a great occasion to dump our stupid
* Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com schrieb:
Requiring policykit, let alone networkmanager and dbus as a default is
not something I'd personally agree with as a sane choice. If you're
trying to build *just* a desktop distro, sure, it's sane. We're not
however, thus invalidating those
* Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org schrieb:
What you are saying makes sense for desktop users since they will
likely already have consolekit/policykit/nm-applet installed, and
hence using NetworkManager for all network management makes sense.
Actually, I've got several Gentoo-based
Hi list,
now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be
honest I was really looking forward for openrc/baselayout-2 finally becoming
stable in Gentoo but this seems to be quite implausible now that openrc has no
upstream anymore.
If there's anyone out there who would
How are we supposed to handle the amount of installations out there
that are using OpenRC then?
OpenRC/bl-2 have proven to be a big improvement over the old stuff. I
am for fixing current bugs, and keep it maintenance mode at least.
I'm already spread over several things but I could give a hand to
El dom, 04-07-2010 a las 16:29 +0200, Lars Wendler escribió:
Hi list,
now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be
honest I was really looking forward for openrc/baselayout-2 finally becoming
stable in Gentoo but this seems to be quite implausible now that
That would be the best but I wonder who has the time to even support
this maintenance mode. We could ask for help from our user community.
Maybe some of our users are quite familiar with the code and be able
to pick up the load fast enough
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Fabio Erculiani
On Sunday, July 04, 2010 10:29:57 Lars Wendler wrote:
now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be
honest I was really looking forward for openrc/baselayout-2 finally
becoming stable in Gentoo but this seems to be quite implausible now that
openrc has no upstream
Am Sonntag 04 Juli 2010, 23:02:39 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
On Sunday, July 04, 2010 10:29:57 Lars Wendler wrote:
now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be
honest I was really looking forward for openrc/baselayout-2 finally
becoming stable in Gentoo but this
On Sunday, July 04, 2010 18:04:29 Lars Wendler wrote:
Am Sonntag 04 Juli 2010, 23:02:39 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
On Sunday, July 04, 2010 10:29:57 Lars Wendler wrote:
now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To
be honest I was really looking forward for
Am Montag 05 Juli 2010, 00:15:44 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
it
certainly doesnt warrant a paniced the sky is falling message.
Which I was nowhere trying to imply. I just wanted to have this situation
sorted out which now hopefully seems to be the case.
--
Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C)
Gentoo
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
which is trivial to fix and anyone with commit privs could have done. it
certainly doesnt warrant a paniced the sky is falling message.
I think this is a great occasion to dump our stupid custom crap and
switch to SystemD, PolicyKit,
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 09:03:41PM -0400, Olivier Crrrte wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
which is trivial to fix and anyone with commit privs could have done. it
certainly doesnt warrant a paniced the sky is falling message.
I think this is a great
On Sunday, July 04, 2010 21:03:41 Olivier Crête wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
which is trivial to fix and anyone with commit privs could have done. it
certainly doesnt warrant a paniced the sky is falling message.
I think this is a great occasion to dump
2010/7/5 Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org:
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
which is trivial to fix and anyone with commit privs could have done. it
certainly doesnt warrant a paniced the sky is falling message.
I think this is a great occasion to dump our stupid
21 matches
Mail list logo
