Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?

2015-03-29 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 14:22:56 "Andreas K. Huettel" napisał(a): > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Am Donnerstag, 26. März 2015, 17:51:04 schrieb William Hubbs: > > > I'm seeing at least two ways of handling zsh completion files in the > > tree. > > > [...] > > > The o

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?

2015-03-29 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Donnerstag, 26. März 2015, 17:51:04 schrieb William Hubbs: > I'm seeing at least two ways of handling zsh completion files in the > tree. > [...] > The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several > other packages -- e.g. un

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?

2015-03-28 Thread William Hubbs
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 08:51:52AM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: > On 27 March 2015 at 00:51, William Hubbs wrote: > > The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several > > other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions > > according to our small files installati

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?

2015-03-27 Thread Ben de Groot
On 27 March 2015 at 00:51, William Hubbs wrote: > The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several > other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions > according to our small files installation practice and not reflecting > the rdepend on app-shells/zsh. This

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?

2015-03-26 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> >> The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several >> other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions >> according to our small files installatio

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?

2015-03-26 Thread Alex Brandt
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 13:17:02 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several > > other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions > > according to our small files installa

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?

2015-03-26 Thread William Hubbs
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 01:17:02PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > > > The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several > > other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions > > according to our small files

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?

2015-03-26 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several > other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions > according to our small files installation practice and not reflecting > the rdepend on app-shells/zs

[gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?

2015-03-26 Thread William Hubbs
All, I'm seeing at least two ways of handling zsh completion files in the tree. The first is in a package I maintain and several others in the tree -- using the zsh-completion use flag along with an rdepend on app-shells/zsh behind the use flag. The package I maintain that does this is www-client