On 07-03-2011 17:25:02 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
As outsider, I don't like to accept another certificate thing, just to
view a bugtracker.
if we're only forcing *login*, then this isnt an issue
+1
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
On 07:50 Tue 08 Mar , Hans de Graaff wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 08:13 -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Thanks! One thing I've been very interested about in 3.x and 4.x is API
access that's better than screen-scraping. I tried using the
python-bugzilla client that accesses Bugzilla
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:06:25 -0500
Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 20:47 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
Why does everyone assume it needs to be enforced? If user is
interested in protecting his/her data, he/she can simply use
https://. If he/she is not, there is no
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:26:34 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:06:25 -0500
Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 20:47 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
Why does everyone assume it needs to be enforced? If user is
interested in protecting his/her data, he/she
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:41:08 +0200
Antoni Grzymała awa...@chopin.edu.pl wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:26:34 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:06:25 -0500
Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 20:47 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
Why does everyone
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:53:01PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:41:08 +0200
Antoni Grzyma??a awa...@chopin.edu.pl wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:26:34 +0100, Micha? Grny wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:06:25 -0500
Olivier Cr??te tes...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 23:55:31 +0100
Christian Ruppert id...@gentoo.org wrote:
SSL is enabled by default now, so it's forced. Unfortunately the
option to force SSL *only* for logged in user is no longer available
in Bugzilla-4.x. It has been added in early 3.x AFAIR and later
replaced by
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:12, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Is there any *real* reason to force SSL? It is *hell* slow.
Do you mean that SSL is slow or that bugs is slow? I also noticed that
Bugzilla is very slow right now, but it seems unlikely that it's due
to SSL.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 23:55:31 +0100 Christian Ruppert wrote:
SSL is enabled by default now, so it's forced. Unfortunately the
option to force SSL *only* for logged in user is no longer available
in Bugzilla-4.x. It has been added in early 3.x
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:24:33 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:12, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Is there any *real* reason to force SSL? It is *hell* slow.
Do you mean that SSL is slow or that bugs is slow? I also noticed that
Bugzilla is very
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:12:14AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 23:55:31 +0100
Christian Ruppert id...@gentoo.org wrote:
SSL is enabled by default now, so it's forced. Unfortunately the
option to force SSL *only* for logged in user is no longer available
in Bugzilla-4.x.
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:55:31PM +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
our Bugzilla (bugs.gentoo.org) will be unavailable for the next hours.
We're going to migrate our old Bugzilla to Bugzilla-4.
We expect our update to finish within the next hours.
All completed now. If you run into any problems,
On 07/03/11 10:51, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
The Gentoo for the Bugzilla service went perfectly, a huge thanks to
idl0r for the years of work he has put into them.
Thanks for all your work on this.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07-03-2011 08:51, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:55:31PM +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
our Bugzilla (bugs.gentoo.org) will be unavailable for the next hours.
We're going to migrate our old Bugzilla to Bugzilla-4.
We expect
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:55:31PM +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
Dear community,
our Bugzilla (bugs.gentoo.org) will be unavailable for the next hours.
We're going to migrate our old Bugzilla to Bugzilla-4.
We expect our update to finish within the next hours.
Some notes:
SSL is
On 09:51 Mon 07 Mar , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
The Gentoo for the Bugzilla service went perfectly, a huge thanks to
idl0r for the years of work he has put into them.
Thanks! One thing I've been very interested about in 3.x and 4.x is API
access that's better than screen-scraping. I tried
Hi!
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we can
decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or not.
Is there any *real* reason to force SSL? It is *hell* slow.
it should of course be force for logging in
If it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/07/2011 09:48 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we can
decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or not.
Is there any *real*
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we can
decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or not.
Is there any *real* reason to force SSL? It is *hell* slow.
On 16:35 Mon 07 Mar , Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 15:13, Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
Thanks! One thing I've been very interested about in 3.x and 4.x is API
access that's better than screen-scraping. I tried using the
python-bugzilla client that
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:48:19 +0100
Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we
can decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or not.
Is there any *real* reason to force
On 03/07/2011 08:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:48:19 +0100
Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we
can decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 20:47 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:48:19 +0100
Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we
can decide if we leave it as it is (plain +
On 07-03-2011 15:06:25 -0500, Olivier Crête wrote:
Maybe it's not to protect the user, but to protect the Gentoo
infrastructure.. And really, SSL has been supported by every browser for
the last 15 years. And it is not in any way slow or slower than non-SSL.
but the certificate security
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote:
As outsider, I don't like to accept another certificate thing, just to
view a bugtracker.
When you think about it, this is a defect with your browser, and not
so much with SSL itself.
Your browser generally doesn't
On 07-03-2011 16:52:23 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
In any case, I don't see poor browser design as a valid reason for
avoiding the use of SSL...
Please use a MUA that properly honours Reply-To: headers. I'm on the
list.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
On Monday, March 07, 2011 16:59:22 Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 07-03-2011 16:52:23 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
In any case, I don't see poor browser design as a valid reason for
avoiding the use of SSL...
Please use a MUA that properly honours Reply-To: headers. I'm on the
list.
subscribed
On Monday, March 07, 2011 16:32:55 Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 07-03-2011 15:06:25 -0500, Olivier Crête wrote:
Maybe it's not to protect the user, but to protect the Gentoo
infrastructure.. And really, SSL has been supported by every browser for
the last 15 years. And it is not in any way slow
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 08:13 -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Thanks! One thing I've been very interested about in 3.x and 4.x is API
access that's better than screen-scraping. I tried using the
python-bugzilla client that accesses Bugzilla via XML-RPC but it didn't
seem to work. Do we have
On 03/07/2011 01:00 AM, Jan Kundrát wrote:
On 03/06/11 23:55, Christian Ruppert wrote:
our Bugzilla (bugs.gentoo.org) will be unavailable for the next hours.
We're going to migrate our old Bugzilla to Bugzilla-4.
We expect our update to finish within the next hours.
(Private reply, as I
30 matches
Mail list logo
