[bunch of linguistic stuff skipped..]
Huh?
Is it just me or is there anybody else who thinks that this went way beyound
ridiculous? Especially considering that Diego himself is not a native English
speaker..
Anyway, after having been all over the world (including 7 years in California)
and
On 01/20/2011 08:42 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
We do distribute part of our packages as binaries already so we have to
be compliant with their licenses to begin with. Better doing it with a
single sweep than trying to come up with abstruse case-by-case points,
no?
No. Licenses are not a
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:23:49 +0100
Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote:
Now we're re-joining policy and practice.
By forcing use of dev.gentoo.org for self-hosted SRC_URI files?
What legitimate use does mirror://gentoo retain when we do have a
solution? Ultimate patch attached.
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 14:47:24 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno gio, 20/01/2011 alle 14.28 -0500, Mike Frysinger ha scritto:
then you should have mentioned this in your original e-mail rather
than
painting infra as angry unhelpful tools. the changes you propose are
merely a
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 14:42:03 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno gio, 20/01/2011 alle 20.27 +0100, Matti Bickel ha scritto:
Not sure what you mean: if someone quickpkg's php and needs all the
source? Well, they already downloaded them. Better keep them around,
since it's *your*
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 14:47:24 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
SNIP
Also angry unhelpful tools? You're putting words in my mail that
aren't there. I said infra _used_ to be against that; it was obvious
that knowing that I wouldn't just push the issue against their