On Thursday, January 20, 2011 14:47:24 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > Il giorno gio, 20/01/2011 alle 14.28 -0500, Mike Frysinger ha scritto: > > then you should have mentioned this in your original e-mail rather > > than > > painting infra as angry unhelpful tools. the changes you propose are > > merely a > > stop gap measure until infra finishes their work. > > You of all people to sound surprised about this really doesn't look > right. The fact that such an archive has been in the work is something > know since I became a dev, six years ago; the bug was open in 2007.
just because a bug has been opened for a long time doesnt mean i'm aware of it. ive never heard of this project before. > Also "angry unhelpful tools"? You're putting words in my mail that > aren't there. I said infra _used_ to be against that; it was obvious > that knowing that I wouldn't just push the issue against their will. no, you didnt. you said "the Infra team has been against this idea". you didnt say anywhere that infra had changed their mind, and this statement made it sound like basically "screw infra, this is what QA says, and if infra doesnt like it they can figure something out on their own". > If you were trying to pick a fight for the sake of it, I'd suggest you > find something else to do. ah yes, i'm sure that's what i'm doing. i love picking fights with you because you're awesome and i am not. and/or i have no fscking idea what you're talking about. hmm, one of those. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
