On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:24:55 -0700
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:41:46PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:37:47 -0700
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:05:03AM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 17:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:10:51 -0400 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Every single year quarter after quarter the more updates
| that happen the slower portage is becoming.
| Care to solve that?
This is a minute amount of time in
Ned Ludd wrote:
| Well it should.
|
| package.keywords package.use package.mask etc..
|
| Where is the stability and consistency when we end up
| forcing people to update /etc/portage files...
Erm... Portage updates these automatically.
as .cfg_** files. The end user still has to
Jakub Moc wrote:
Erm... Portage updates these automatically.
as .cfg_** files. The end user still has to run an etc-update and
pray that it was not a file he/she had in masking.
Err, no? You don't need to run etc-update/dispatch-conf to get those
updated on package moves.
Err, yes. At
dev-db/xmysqladmin has no herd or maintainer, upstream hasn't made a
release since 2001, and it has an open security bug [1].
It's already package.masked since about a year because of the security
bug, so the removal is long overdue, and I will proceed with it in a month.
An alternative, more
Hi all.
Joshua Ross (joslway) joined the Gentoo/PPC64 team a couple weeks ago.
He'll be helping with release engineering among other things.
Joshua has an extensive background in programming and different OSes
going all the way back to a hex based machine. We finally managed to
convince Joss to
Welcome joslwah! :)
On Saturday 22 July 2006 17:28, Bryan Østergaard wrote:
I'm a research mathematician with interests in linguistics. I'm a
Brit., living in China, so am used to utf-8 and CJK issues.
Uh, fresh meat for the CJK herd and possibly for an eventual future i18n
project? :)
--
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:05:20 -0700
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately the category system is deeply embedded in portage
and the tree, so changing that system is simply not going to
happen, which is why I've stopped whinging about the semantic
inadequacy of the system.
Currently we have the following local xinetd USE flags. The semantics
of xinetd in each case are roughly the same:
dev-db/firebird:xinetd - If you want inetd version instead of a superserver
(daemon)
net-ftp/proftpd:xinetd - Enable support for starting from xinetd
net-ftp/vsftpd:xinetd - Add
Bryan Østergaard wrote:
Joshua Ross (joslway) joined the Gentoo/PPC64 team a couple weeks ago.
He'll be helping with release engineering among other things.
[...]
Welcome aboard, Joshua! :D
--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
Gentoo Forums Global Moderator
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 /
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 06:04:10PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:05:20 -0700
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately the category system is deeply embedded in portage
and the tree, so changing that system is simply not going to
happen, which is why
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:04:10 +0200 Kevin F. Quinn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| If it were to be implemented with symlinks (implying one entry is
| real and the others are aliases) the package manager just needs to
| canonicalise any symlinked CPs it comes across.
Not that simple. Think about
On Saturday 22 July 2006 17:28, Bryan (kloeri) wrote:
Hi all.
Joshua Ross (joslway) joined the Gentoo/PPC64 team a couple weeks ago.
He'll be helping with release engineering among other things.
Joshua has an extensive background in programming and different OSes
going all the way back to a hex
Updated version, revised to use Gentoo supplied color codes (thanks to
shillelagh for pointing me to these).
http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/einput.eclass
Also cleaned up logic in displayListPrompt.
Regards,
John
Open source, you don't pay back, you pay forward.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
On Sat, 2006-22-07 at 04:43 +0900, Chris White wrote:
This said, the following are recommendations:
1) Create aliases to the new functions, then at some
yet-to-be-determined point, kill the aliases and bomb on the scripts
(this suffers from procrastination).
2) Make an official release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris White wrote:
1) Create aliases to the new functions, then at some
yet-to-be-determined point, kill the aliases and bomb on the scripts
(this suffers from procrastination).
2) Make an official release with the new function names and no
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 04:25:01PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
Chris White wrote:
1) Create aliases to the new functions, then at some
yet-to-be-determined point, kill the aliases and bomb on the scripts
(this suffers from procrastination).
2) Make an official release with the new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Kelly wrote:
Hello,
This is that patch I had mentioned earlier on #gentoo-portage. It works
by sourcing every script found in
/var/libexec/portage/hooks/{pre,post}_${EBUILD_PHASE} at the
appropriate time.
In my case, I feel this
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 16:52:38 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Kelly wrote:
In my case, I feel this functionality would be very useful as it
allows for me to integrate my GLEP 27 implementation into portage
without portage
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 16:25:01 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris White wrote:
1) Create aliases to the new functions, then at some
yet-to-be-determined point, kill the aliases and bomb on the scripts
(this suffers from
20 matches
Mail list logo
