On Freitag, 13. Juni 2008, Santiago M. Mola wrote:
Hi all,
As discussed in bug #222721, portage has changed the execution order
of phases. It seems the change was introduced in portage-2.1.5 and it
makes that, when upgrading a package, pkg_postinst is run after the
old version has been
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Matthias Schwarzott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Freitag, 13. Juni 2008, Santiago M. Mola wrote:
Hi all,
As discussed in bug #222721, portage has changed the execution order
of phases. It seems the change was introduced in portage-2.1.5 and it
makes that,
В Срд, 11/06/2008 в 19:45 -0400, Jim Ramsay пишет:
Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would prefer something that
doesn't add extra lines to ebuild.
I think I would disagree with you here. I think that having a special
'eblank' or 'eseparator' command is much more readable in
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But speaking about names of options - -A and -B are easier to remember
as -A stands for above and -B for below and grep users already knew
that.
for grep -A means after and -B before ;)
--
Benedikt
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008.06.06 19:27, Ferris McCormick wrote:
I also nominate:
NeddySeagoon
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
Ladies and Gentlemen,
After a week
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
This is a quick reminder that the period for making and accepting
nominations will end on June 18, 2008 23:59 UTC - end of next Wednesday.
The current nominees and the state of their acceptance can be checked on
В Сбт, 14/06/2008 в 19:28 +0200, Luca Barbato пишет:
I don't see disadvantages, all I wanted is a simple way to archive this:
[# emaint -r ffmpeg ... # emerge ffmpeg -L ... egen ... skipped most of stuff]
Your example shows that .live ebuilds fix different issue. What you
are suggesting are
В Вск, 15/06/2008 в 13:19 +0200, Benedikt Morbach пишет:
But speaking about names of options - -A and -B are easier to
remember
as -A stands for above and -B for below and grep users already knew
that.
for grep -A means after and -B before ;)
True. And still, one day I learn this
Benedikt Morbach wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But speaking about names of options - -A and -B are easier to remember
as -A stands for above and -B for below and grep users already knew
that.
for grep -A means after and -B before ;)
I (not
В Чтв, 12/06/2008 в 09:36 +0200, Markus Ullmann пишет:
The PMS maintainers were withholding information on compatibility
issues they've seen. As such we can't be sure this will pop up again
in the future and so I strongly suggest dismissing this as something
official for gentoo.
Dismissing
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:42:28 +0400
Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By formalizing I mean the following: call for and form PMS team. Team
must represent portage developers and could paludis and pkgcore. All
suggestions for PMS draft must go into bugzilla and after patch for
PMS is
On Sunday 15 June 2008 15:42:28 Peter Volkov wrote:
For example, currently, PMS team does not include anybody from portage
team - official PM team and thus this team can't represent Gentoo
interests.
The Portage team is perfectly welcome to contribute if they wish. zmedico is
on the alias,
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Since some people have been asking about this... Here's how I'd see
upstream revision awareness being added to the -scm proposal.
* add src_fetch_extra or whatever to avoid doing the fetches in
src_unpack.
* add pkg_scm_info. It outputs a string containing no
В Вск, 15/06/2008 в 15:50 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:42:28 +0400
Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By formalizing I mean the following: call for and form PMS team. Team
must represent portage developers and could paludis and pkgcore. All
suggestions for PMS
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:27:35 +0400
Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would a voting system be better than the current if anyone
doesn't like it, don't commit it until whatever they don't like is
fixed process?
Voting makes the process converging. It helps to avoid same arguments
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:47:02 +0200
Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* When updating an scm package, do src_fetch_extra then
pkg_scm_info. At user option, if the pkg_scm_info value hasn't
changed and it's a reinstall, skip reinstalling.
... and reset the reference date $user_option
Hi,
Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
opfer (Christian Faulhammer)
Thanks, but I decline.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-06-15 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
x11-plugins/gai-pager 2008-06-09 16:36:41 drac
x11-plugins/gai-pal 2008-06-09 16:36:42 drac
x11-libs/gai
18 matches
Mail list logo
