On Monday 22 December 2008 11:40:32 pm Branko Badrljica wrote:
Duncan wrote:
Branko Badrljica bran...@avtomatika.com posted
494f1518.2020...@avtomatika.com, excerpted below, on Mon, 22 Dec 2008
05:18:32 +0100:
Maybe I should have filed this as a bug, but don't have a clue to which
Branko Badrljica wrote:
Since I might not be the only tinkerer on Gentoo to try stuff like that
and since it took me a day to find this, maybe it wouldn't hurt to check
for this kind of thing in portage ?
At the very least failed cp should stop emerge...
Well there isn't a single place
The two packages are now superseded by busybox, and as discussed with
solar, they are bound to disappear from Portage in the usual 30 days.
If somebody is interested in them please pick them up.
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Petteri Räty wrote:
Branko Badrljica wrote:
Since I might not be the only tinkerer on Gentoo to try stuff like that
and since it took me a day to find this, maybe it wouldn't hurt to check
for this kind of thing in portage ?
At the very least failed cp should stop emerge...
Well
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:48 +0100, Hanno Böck wrote:
Hi,
We have ruby 1.8.7 in the tree masked since April.
# Richard Brown rbr...@gentoo.org (16 Apr 2008)
# Masked for test
=dev-lang/ruby-1.8.7*
There's no tracker bug or anything alike about the status of unmasking, so I
wanted to
Jonas Bernoulli wrote:
Hi
May I suggest that you add links so that anoncvs.g.o and sources.g.o
link to one another. Users might find one of those pages and think
that's all there is to it. However both of the pages contain
information not available on the other. anoncvs.g.o mentions git and
Doug Goldstein wrote:
Petteri Räty wrote:
Branko Badrljica wrote:
Since I might not be the only tinkerer on Gentoo to try stuff like that
and since it took me a day to find this, maybe it wouldn't hurt to check
for this kind of thing in portage ?
At the very least failed cp should stop
