Andrey Grozin wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008, Petteri R?ty wrote:
Who has been removing die statements? Is this a suggested way of action
somewhere by someone?
As recently discussed on the list, econf dies by itself, and || die
should better be removed after econf. The same is true for, e.g.,
eqma
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008, Petteri R?ty wrote:
Who has been removing die statements? Is this a suggested way of action
somewhere by someone?
As recently discussed on the list, econf dies by itself, and || die should
better be removed after econf. The same is true for, e.g., eqmake4. It was
discussed
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Branko Badrljica wrote:
>>
>>> Since I might not be the only tinkerer on Gentoo to try stuff like that
>>> and since it took me a day to find this, maybe it wouldn't hurt to check
>>> for this kind of thing in portage ?
>>> At the very least failed c
Jonas Bernoulli wrote:
> Hi
>
> May I suggest that you add links so that anoncvs.g.o and sources.g.o
> link to one another. Users might find one of those pages and think
> that's all there is to it. However both of the pages contain
> information not available on the other. anoncvs.g.o mentions gi
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:48 +0100, Hanno Böck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have ruby 1.8.7 in the tree masked since April.
>
> # Richard Brown (16 Apr 2008)
> # Masked for test
> =dev-lang/ruby-1.8.7*
>
> There's no tracker bug or anything alike about the status of unmasking, so I
> wanted to ask what'
Petteri Räty wrote:
Branko Badrljica wrote:
Since I might not be the only tinkerer on Gentoo to try stuff like that
and since it took me a day to find this, maybe it wouldn't hurt to check
for this kind of thing in portage ?
At the very least failed cp should stop emerge...
Well ther
The two packages are now superseded by busybox, and as discussed with
solar, they are bound to disappear from Portage in the usual 30 days.
If somebody is interested in them please pick them up.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
Branko Badrljica wrote:
>
> Since I might not be the only tinkerer on Gentoo to try stuff like that
> and since it took me a day to find this, maybe it wouldn't hurt to check
> for this kind of thing in portage ?
> At the very least failed cp should stop emerge...
>
>
Well there isn't a single
On Monday 22 December 2008 11:40:32 pm Branko Badrljica wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
> > Branko Badrljica posted
> > 494f1518.2020...@avtomatika.com, excerpted below, on Mon, 22 Dec 2008
> >
> > 05:18:32 +0100:
> >> Maybe I should have filed this as a bug, but don't have a clue to which
> >> package sh
