On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 20:47 Mon 16 Mar , Ryan Hill wrote:
Whether it's enabled for EAPI 3 or not, I'd at least like to see 'test'
added to FEATURES in targets/developer/make.defaults now. That should
(hopefully) raise the
On 15:27 Fri 17 Apr , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 15:17 Fri 17 Apr , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev
list to see.
I've got a few items pending that I
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 16:17 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:11:15 +0300
Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote:
* ECONF-OPTIONS
query
--disable-dependency-tracking has other implications than it being
allowed to be passed to ./configure or not - such as dependency
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 02:57:34PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:56:08 +0300
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ok. So people should then be using has_version in pkg_info if they
want to detect if it's installed or not?
If they absolutely totally need to
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 16:03 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:11:15 +0300
Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote:
* SLOT-OPERATOR-DEPS
An outstanding problem to me as a package maintainer is the lack of
means to know which slot the PM actually picked for the package, as
Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2009, 23:21 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
On 15:27 Fri 17 Apr , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 15:17 Fri 17 Apr , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the
Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:35:37PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
Here's an eclass proposal to wrap EXPORT_FUNCTIONS with auto detection
of functions. This way all eclasses don't have to duplicate the EAPI
detection code. If people find this useful, I will document it
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:29:11 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 02:57:34PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:56:08 +0300
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ok. So people should then be using has_version in pkg_info if they
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:56:56 +0300
Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote:
If a parallel install is overwriting things on / whilst a package is
compiling, things are already horribly broken regardless of this
switch. PMS explicitly forbids that from happening.
That's that. And then there's
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:48:08 +0300
Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote:
The best installed version that matches the spec is always picked
for :=. We originally considered making this more complicated, or
possibly making ways of saying all installed slots, but neither
appears to have a
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:21:26 -0700
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
Here is an updated agenda. I've removed a few items that I consider
lower priority and unlikely for us to have time for during this
week's meeting.
Please bring forward dleverton's Portage repeatedly changing
On 12:15 Thu 23 Apr , Tiziano Müller wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2009, 23:21 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
Here is an updated agenda. I've removed a few items that I consider
lower priority and unlikely for us to have time for during this
week's meeting. Also, I added the issue
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:53:24 -0700
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
Which other important topic should we drop for it? I'm thinking we
probably won't even get to the last one, that's almost a wish list. I
think there's a pretty reasonable chance we also wouldn't get to
whatever
(Somewhat late, but here we go )
* PKG-PRETEND
critical
* SLOT-OPERATOR-DEPS
yes
* USE-DEP-DEFAULTS
critical
* DEFINED-PHASES
critical
* PROPERTIES
critical
* SRC-INSTALL
critical
* CONTROLLABLE-COMPRESS
critical
* DODOC
yes
* DOINS
yes
* ANY-USE
whatever
*
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:58 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:56:56 +0300
Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote:
If a parallel install is overwriting things on / whilst a package is
compiling, things are already horribly broken regardless of this
switch. PMS explicitly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 12:15 Thu 23 Apr , Tiziano Müller wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2009, 23:21 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
Here is an updated agenda. I've removed a few items that I consider
lower priority and unlikely for us to
Tom Stellard wrote:
I am trying to build the Gentoo cluster live CD using the overlay from
here: git://git.overlays.gentoo.org/proj/clustering-livecd.git I have run
into some problems with some of the ebuilds in this overlay. Here is a
patch to fix the beowulf-head ebuild.
-Tom Stellard
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
So my point is that the whole of the council should consider the
objections of an individual council member, so that potentially bad
things don't end up accepted based on some kind of an uninformed
majority vote or concensus.
Probably the best way to accomplish something
Hi!
i'm here to report ESTALE beeing missing on interix ;) seems like
portage is checking on it lately, so i required the attached patch to
get portage working on interix again (prefix).
any chance to get sth. alike in the svn tree? maybe a more generic
thing? but i guess that would not be
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:55 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
Hi!
i'm here to report ESTALE beeing missing on interix ;) seems like
portage is checking on it lately, so i required the attached patch to
get portage working on interix again (prefix).
djanderson pointed out that I could have made the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Duft wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:55 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
Hi!
i'm here to report ESTALE beeing missing on interix ;) seems like
portage is checking on it lately, so i required the attached patch to
get portage working on interix
21 matches
Mail list logo
