[gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-23 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Monday 08 March 2010 03:17:57 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: On Thursday 04 March 2010 16:52:50 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: Hello I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus. The result can be found in kde-crazy overlay (not in layman) [1] I splitted every desktop/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages pulling in python-3*, also they dont require it

2010-03-23 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-22 22:12:54 Jacob Godserv napisał(a): On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote: 2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a): So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news item saying that python-3 will soon

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages pulling in python-3*, also they dont require it

2010-03-23 Thread Duncan
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis posted on Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:37:34 +0100 as excerpted: 2010-03-22 22:12:54 Jacob Godserv napisał(a): On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote: 2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a): So let's just

[gentoo-dev] bug-wranglers queue is large

2010-03-23 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Given that the b-w queue is over 200 bugs and some have not been wrangled for 3 weeks... Could everyone spend 5 minutes wrangling 5 bugs? (or more if you are willing :) Thanks, Jeremy

Re: [gentoo-dev] bug-wranglers queue is large

2010-03-23 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 23-03-2010 19:15, Jeremy Olexa wrote: Given that the b-w queue is over 200 bugs and some have not been wrangled for 3 weeks... Could everyone spend 5 minutes wrangling 5 bugs? (or more if you are willing :) Thanks, Jeremy I'm going to grab this one and ask how is Gentoo going in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-23 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-04 19:38:12 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napisał(a): On 3/4/10 7:22 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 'eselect python COMMAND --python3 [ARGUMENTS]' can be used to manage configuration of active version of Python 3. I'm confused by the above paragraph. I had to spend a longer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-23 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
I'm attaching updated news item, which will be committed soon. Stabilization has been delayed to 2010-04-21, but members of architecture projects can start testing now, to ensure that all potential problems have been found and fixed. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis Title: Python 3.1

Re: [gentoo-dev] bug-wranglers queue is large

2010-03-23 Thread Thomas Kahle
On 03/23/2010 07:55 PM, Angelo Arrifano wrote: On 23-03-2010 19:15, Jeremy Olexa wrote: Given that the b-w queue is over 200 bugs and some have not been wrangled for 3 weeks... Could everyone spend 5 minutes wrangling 5 bugs? (or more if you are willing :) Thanks, Jeremy I'm going to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-23 Thread Ben de Groot
On 23 March 2010 20:13, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm attaching updated news item, which will be committed soon. As mentioned in the other thread, this news item should mention that users who do not need python-3 should mask it locally to prevent it from

[gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-23 Thread Jonathan Callen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/23/2010 03:13 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: I'm attaching updated news item, which will be committed soon. A couple grammar issues: - -modules, which support both Python 2 and Python 3, are installed for both - -active

[gentoo-dev] misc packages up for grabs

2010-03-23 Thread Jeremy Olexa
I will be moving these to maintainer-needed in a few days. I no longer use them and have little motivation to fix incoming bugs. Don't bother to ask, just feel free to change metadata.xml to yourself. Thanks, Jeremy app-admin/bcfg2 Has a proxy maintainer that I haven't heard from in quite some

Re: [gentoo-dev] bug-wranglers queue is large

2010-03-23 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
I can do a bit, I already have bugedit permissions from AMD64 AT and do bugwrangling for the KDE team. Are there any written rules somewhere on what can / should / must not be done by a non-dev (not yet dev?) bugwrangler on the general queue? Cheers, Andreas (dilfridge) Am Dienstag 23 März

[gentoo-dev] Re: bug-wranglers queue is large

2010-03-23 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Andreas K. Huettel m...@akhuettel.de: I can do a bit, I already have bugedit permissions from AMD64 AT and do bugwrangling for the KDE team. Are there any written rules somewhere on what can / should / must not be done by a non-dev (not yet dev?) bugwrangler on the general queue? The

Re: [gentoo-dev] bug-wranglers queue is large

2010-03-23 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/23/10 20:24, Thomas Kahle wrote: Currently I am waiting for my extended bugzilla rights http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309967 . For the list record: halcy0n gave him permissions in the meantime. Thomas, welcome on buzilla board! Sebastian