2010-03-22 22:12:54 Jacob Godserv napisał(a): > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis > <arfre...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > 2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a): > >> So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news > >> item saying that python-3 will soon (give a date) be unmasked, and suggest > >> that users not needing it may wish to package.mask it themselves, with a > >> link to documentation with specific instructions and a bit more detail on > >> why they might wish to mask it and under what circumstances they might not. > >> > >> I'd suggest an unmasking date 30 days after the release of the news item. > > > > Python 3 is not masked. The discussion is about stabilization. > > Duncan's comments still apply, though, right? What's against writing a > news item about stabilizing Python?
There is already a thread about news item: http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_814e67764c17f88bde94f22e9a392e4f.xml -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.