Il giorno mar, 23/08/2011 alle 23.52 -0700, Tim Harder ha scritto:
> I thought xz-utils can be assumed as well since it was added to the
> system set almost six months ago [1].
It has really very little to do with being in the system set or not. And
the answer is no, you cannot assume that...
--
On 2011-08-24 Wed 00:21, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 23/08/2011 alle 23.52 -0700, Tim Harder ha scritto:
> > I thought xz-utils can be assumed as well since it was added to the
> > system set almost six months ago [1].
> It has really very little to do with being in the system set o
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 23/08/2011 alle 05.21 +1000, Michael ha scritto:
>>
>> Any thoughts to as how far I should go with filing bugs regarding
>> this
>> issue?
>
> Please if you're going to file bugs about this, do so only on a system
> built with _forced_ --as-needed, othe
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:31:29AM -0700, Tim Harder wrote:
> On 2011-08-24 Wed 00:21, Diego Elio Petten?? wrote:
> > Il giorno mar, 23/08/2011 alle 23.52 -0700, Tim Harder ha scritto:
> > > I thought xz-utils can be assumed as well since it was added to the
> > > system set almost six months ago [
Il giorno mer, 24/08/2011 alle 19.49 +1000, Michael ha scritto:
>
> Is /this/ considered to be a bug? Do I just write a patch to stop
> linking
> against libs that aren't needed?
Yes this is a bug in gpgme, it has to RDEPEND on libassuan rather than
just DEPEND on it, since it reports it to --l
Hi,
On 18:16 Tue 23 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> there is one important aspect of your program that really needs to be
> documented (and comments in the code are not enough):
>
> What data exactly is the client sending to the server?!
>
> What you need is basically an easy-to-find file /
On 08/24/11 12:31, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18:16 Tue 23 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> there is one important aspect of your program that really needs to be
>> documented (and comments in the code are not enough):
>>
>> What data exactly is the client sending to the server?!
>>
>>
Am Mittwoch 24 August 2011, 12:48:35 schrieb Patrick Lauer:
>
> If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get
> pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland will
> meet some rather unpleasant resistance :)
>
Of course, we could place it in some blatantl
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get
> pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland will
> meet some rather unpleasant resistance :)
Well, we could always broadcast the news widely (lists,
On 12:48 Wed 24 Aug 2011, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 08/24/11 12:31, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 18:16 Tue 23 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> >> there is one important aspect of your program that really needs to be
> >> documented (and comments in the code are not enough):
> >>
> >
On 13:03 Wed 24 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 24 August 2011, 12:48:35 schrieb Patrick Lauer:
> >
> > If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get
> > pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland will
> > meet some rather unpleasant r
i am a user and i am ok with opt-out if the std data that is transferd
is compleatly anonymized
so no sensitive data.
and if the user wants to register his/her machine pkg's more data is trasnfered
thx
Mario
2011/8/24 Thomas Kahle :
> On 13:03 Wed 24 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> Am Mit
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Sorry, but NO. If you want you can make a big noise message that asks
> users to install the cron-job but opt-out is not an option here.
Well, that's up to the Council/Trustees ultimately, but opinions (and
better still reasoning) are welcom
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:07:54 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Patrick Lauer
> wrote:
>> If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get
>> pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland will
>> meet some rather unple
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
>> Sorry, but NO. If you want you can make a big noise message that asks
>> users to install the cron-job but opt-out is not an option here.
>
> Well, that's up to the Council/Trustees ult
15 matches
Mail list logo
