Il giorno mar, 23/08/2011 alle 05.21 +1000, Michael ha scritto:
Any thoughts to as how far I should go with filing bugs regarding
this
issue?
Please if you're going to file bugs about this, do so only on a system
built with _forced_ --as-needed, otherwise you're going to hit a long
list of
On 2011-08-23 Tue 12:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
assuming you're referring to them because the SRC_URI is compressed by the
relevant formats, atm only bzip2 and gzip is allowed to be assumed.
everything else has to be in DEPEND. there is work/discussion to automate
this (implicit unpack
Il giorno mar, 23/08/2011 alle 23.52 -0700, Tim Harder ha scritto:
I thought xz-utils can be assumed as well since it was added to the
system set almost six months ago [1].
It has really very little to do with being in the system set or not. And
the answer is no, you cannot assume that...
--
On 2011-08-24 Wed 00:21, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno mar, 23/08/2011 alle 23.52 -0700, Tim Harder ha scritto:
I thought xz-utils can be assumed as well since it was added to the
system set almost six months ago [1].
It has really very little to do with being in the system set or
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno mar, 23/08/2011 alle 05.21 +1000, Michael ha scritto:
Any thoughts to as how far I should go with filing bugs regarding
this
issue?
Please if you're going to file bugs about this, do so only on a system
built with _forced_ --as-needed, otherwise
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:31:29AM -0700, Tim Harder wrote:
On 2011-08-24 Wed 00:21, Diego Elio Petten?? wrote:
Il giorno mar, 23/08/2011 alle 23.52 -0700, Tim Harder ha scritto:
I thought xz-utils can be assumed as well since it was added to the
system set almost six months ago [1].
Il giorno mer, 24/08/2011 alle 19.49 +1000, Michael ha scritto:
Is /this/ considered to be a bug? Do I just write a patch to stop
linking
against libs that aren't needed?
Yes this is a bug in gpgme, it has to RDEPEND on libassuan rather than
just DEPEND on it, since it reports it to
Hi,
On 18:16 Tue 23 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
there is one important aspect of your program that really needs to be
documented (and comments in the code are not enough):
What data exactly is the client sending to the server?!
What you need is basically an easy-to-find file / web
On 08/24/11 12:31, Thomas Kahle wrote:
Hi,
On 18:16 Tue 23 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
there is one important aspect of your program that really needs to be
documented (and comments in the code are not enough):
What data exactly is the client sending to the server?!
What you need
Am Mittwoch 24 August 2011, 12:48:35 schrieb Patrick Lauer:
If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get
pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland will
meet some rather unpleasant resistance :)
Of course, we could place it in some blatantly
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get
pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland will
meet some rather unpleasant resistance :)
Well, we could always broadcast the news
On 12:48 Wed 24 Aug 2011, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On 08/24/11 12:31, Thomas Kahle wrote:
Hi,
On 18:16 Tue 23 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
there is one important aspect of your program that really needs to be
documented (and comments in the code are not enough):
What data
On 13:03 Wed 24 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Mittwoch 24 August 2011, 12:48:35 schrieb Patrick Lauer:
If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get
pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland will
meet some rather unpleasant
i am a user and i am ok with opt-out if the std data that is transferd
is compleatly anonymized
so no sensitive data.
and if the user wants to register his/her machine pkg's more data is trasnfered
thx
Mario
2011/8/24 Thomas Kahle to...@gentoo.org:
On 13:03 Wed 24 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Thomas Kahle to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Sorry, but NO. If you want you can make a big noise message that asks
users to install the cron-job but opt-out is not an option here.
Well, that's up to the Council/Trustees ultimately, but opinions (and
better still
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:07:54 -0400 as excerpted:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org
wrote:
If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get
pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland will
meet some
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Thomas Kahle to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Sorry, but NO. If you want you can make a big noise message that asks
users to install the cron-job but opt-out is not an option here.
Well, that's up
17 matches
Mail list logo
