On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
dev-python/markups
A wrapper around various text markups
The python team can take this one.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On 11/13/14 21:38, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 14/11/14 11:06, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Michael Palimaka
kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ditching implicit dependencies is an interesting idea but not practical.
Nobody wants to the laundry list, and there's little
On 11/13/14 23:15, Zac Medico wrote:
On 11/13/2014 08:01 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 14/11/14 11:06, Rich Freeman wrote:
Well, the idea would be to maintain the virtual INSTEAD of @system, or
have @system just pull
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
Sorry Zac, I posted my reply before I read this. This is essentially the
point I was making. However, I think this will be cumbersome. With the
current way we do things, its easy to delete packages from @system by
On 11/13/2014 10:17 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Isn't it possible to disable C++ in GCC with USE=-cxx?
It is.. but unfortunately there's no way in DEPEND to ensure it's
satisfied, as you can have a gcc installed with that flag enabled but
have a second one (that's actually selected in
On 11/13/2014 01:13 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Michael Palimaka
kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 14/11/14 01:05, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Isn't it possible to disable C++ in GCC with USE=-cxx?
It is, but I think if that's disabled you're on your own. :-)
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 07:20:50 -0500 Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 11/13/14 23:15, Zac Medico wrote:
On 11/13/2014 08:01 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 14/11/14 11:06, Rich Freeman wrote:
Well, the idea would
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:10:43 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 11/13/2014 01:13 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Michael Palimaka
kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 14/11/14 01:05, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Isn't it possible to disable C++ in GCC with USE=-cxx?
It
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:08:17 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 11/13/2014 10:17 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Isn't it possible to disable C++ in GCC with USE=-cxx?
It is.. but unfortunately there's no way in DEPEND to ensure it's
satisfied, as you can have a gcc installed with that
Dnia 2014-11-14, o godz. 09:08:17
Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 11/13/2014 10:17 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Isn't it possible to disable C++ in GCC with USE=-cxx?
It is.. but unfortunately there's no way in DEPEND to ensure it's
satisfied, as you can have a gcc
Am Freitag, 14. November 2014, 15:49:17 schrieb Andrew Savchenko:
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:08:17 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Question 1: is it desirable to e.g. switch compilers, compile systemd,
and then switch back?
This is definitely a good idea. Some packages are picky about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/11/14 10:50 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Freitag, 14. November 2014, 15:49:17 schrieb Andrew Savchenko:
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:08:17 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Question 1: is it desirable to e.g. switch compilers, compile
On 11/14/2014 06:14 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 07:20:50 -0500 Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 11/13/14 23:15, Zac Medico wrote:
On 11/13/2014 08:01 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 14/11/14
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:50:24 +0100 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Freitag, 14. November 2014, 15:49:17 schrieb Andrew Savchenko:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:08:17 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Question 1: is it desirable to e.g. switch compilers, compile systemd,
and then switch back?
This
On 11/14/2014 06:58 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-11-14, o godz. 09:08:17
Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 11/13/2014 10:17 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Isn't it possible to disable C++ in GCC with USE=-cxx?
It is.. but unfortunately there's no way in DEPEND to ensure
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:08:17 -0500
Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote:
Question 1: is it desirable to e.g. switch compilers, compile systemd,
and then switch back?
This will horrifically break things like Portage's parallel build...
Note that on every distribution except Gentoo, there are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/17/2014 09:43 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 10/17/14 14:55, Markos Chandras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
On 10/07/2014 01:00 AM, Patrick McLean wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:25:53 -0400 Anthony G. Basile
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:08:17 -0500
Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote:
Question 1: is it desirable to e.g. switch compilers, compile systemd,
and then switch back?
This will horrifically break things
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:17:12 -0500
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:08:17 -0500
Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote:
Question 1: is it desirable to e.g. switch compilers,
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:03:27 -0800 Zac Medico wrote:
[...]
Sorry Zac, I posted my reply before I read this. This is essentially
the point I was making. However, I think this will be cumbersome. With
the current way we do things, its easy to delete packages from @system
by just doing
El vie, 14-11-2014 a las 19:23 +, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
[...]
It *also* isn't an issue on any other source based distribution. This
is entirely down to Gentoo libstdc++ silliness.
However, the right way to do this isn't to toggle some global setting
- it is to just apply specific
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Alexander Hof gentoo...@cosmofox.net wrote:
Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Michael Palimaka
kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 14/11/14 01:05, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Isn't it possible to disable C++ in GCC with USE=-cxx?
It is, but I
Mike Gilbert wrote:
There are people that don't want c++ and gcc:4.7 can still bootstrap
without.
Those people know what they are doing and could un-force the use
flag. That would prevent people from accidentally disabling it via
USE=-*.
Are we talking about forcing +cxx globally or for
On 11/14/2014 11:42 PM, Alexander Hof wrote:
Mike Gilbert wrote:
There are people that don't want c++ and gcc:4.7 can still bootstrap
without.
Those people know what they are doing and could un-force the use
flag. That would prevent people from accidentally disabling it via
USE=-*.
Are
hasufell wrote:
Are we talking about forcing +cxx globally or for gcc (+toolchain)?
Has this been a major problem in the past? Shouldn't people who set
USE=-* also know what they are doing?
* don't ever assume that the user knows what he is doing
* still allow him to break things if he
Mike Gilbert posted on Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:55:10 -0500 as excerpted:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Alexander Hof gentoo...@cosmofox.net
wrote:
Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Michael Palimaka
kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 14/11/14 01:05, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
i'm interested on sys-apps/epoch, if no one takes it
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello all
Due to lack of time I'm giving up some packages. Feel free to take them:
app-admin/ec2-ami-tools
app-admin/ec2-api-tools
On 14/11/14 15:01, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 14/11/14 11:06, Rich Freeman wrote:
Well, the idea would be to maintain the virtual INSTEAD of @system, or
have @system just pull in the virtual and make some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
LGTM. Go ahead merge.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/11/14 08:42, Zac Medico wrote:
+ eprefix = os.environ.get(EPREFIX, portage.const.EPREFIX)
+ if eprefix:
+ eprefix = portage.util.normalize_path(eprefix)
Why not just:
eprefix =
Hi all,
i think the answer is you can't but i wan to try :) .
I setup a builder ( FEATURES=buildpkg ) server to deploy bin packages
for other servers ( FEATURES=getbinpkg ) ?
For example:
mail-mta/postfix with USE=mysql
mail-mta/postfix without mysql
Sometimes can be useful to have a binpackage
On 11/14/2014 05:29 AM, ma...@nucleus.it wrote:
Hi all,
i think the answer is you can't but i wan to try :) .
I setup a builder ( FEATURES=buildpkg ) server to deploy bin packages
for other servers ( FEATURES=getbinpkg ) ?
For example:
mail-mta/postfix with USE=mysql
mail-mta/postfix
On 11/14/2014 12:57 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
On 14/11/14 08:42, Zac Medico wrote:
+eprefix = os.environ.get(EPREFIX, portage.const.EPREFIX)
+if eprefix:
+eprefix = portage.util.normalize_path(eprefix)
Why not just:
eprefix =
On 11/14/2014 03:29 AM, ma...@nucleus.it wrote:
Hi all,
i think the answer is you can't but i wan to try :) .
I setup a builder ( FEATURES=buildpkg ) server to deploy bin packages
for other servers ( FEATURES=getbinpkg ) ?
For example:
mail-mta/postfix with USE=mysql
mail-mta/postfix
When getUnreadItems tries to lock the news.unread file, it's safe to
ignore EROFS. This is handled with a ReadOnlyFileSystem exception
raised from the portage.locks.lockfile function.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 490732
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490732
---
This updated patch
On 11/11/2014 01:14 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
On 11/11/14 01:17, Zac Medico wrote:
We could certainly express it in a way that doesn't involve any
mutating loop control variables, but ultimately that's going to
lead to more lines of code, and it will leave imperative
programmers wondering
Split out a first_existing function, in order to improve logic related
to the _unprivileged_mode function so that it checks whether it's
possible to create the specified target root (instead of requiring that
the target root already exists).
---
pym/portage/data.py | 20
37 matches
Mail list logo
