On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 08:18 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > +- one or more elements, each containing a version
> > + constraint in the format matching EAPI 0 dependency specification
> > + with the package category and name parts omit
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:15:31 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> It might be easier to take smaller steps, such as having a policy that
> "any call for devs to use/test a new tool/service, or any service that
> automatically performs transactions on bugzilla, must be FOSS, and the
> link to the source mu
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
> It has two advantages:
> 1. It reduces the risk of accidentally leaving it in the stable ebuild.
Huh, you mean you would remove the PROPERTIES token again, after the
version has been stabilised? Why?
Ebuilds could do conditionals like this (again
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 10:26 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
> > It has two advantages:
> > 1. It reduces the risk of accidentally leaving it in the stable ebuild.
>
> Huh, you mean you would remove the PROPERTIES token again, after the
> version ha
# Hans de Graaff (2020-09-16)
# Dependencies of the already removed metasploit that are relevant
# only with metasploit. Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-ruby/meterpreter_bins
dev-ruby/patch_finder
dev-ruby/rb-readline-r7
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Michał,
Thanks for your efforts. This looks interesting at the very least, and
whilst in many cases on posts on this ML I'm on the "don't care" stance,
this one looks like it could solve some problems for me.
net-misc/asterisk + friends will definitely make use of this.
Two nitpicks below th
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 11:13 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote:
> Hi Michał,
>
> Thanks for your efforts. This looks interesting at the very least, and
> whilst in many cases on posts on this ML I'm on the "don't care" stance,
> this one looks like it could solve some problems for me.
> net-misc/asterisk +
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 4:17 AM Kent Fredric wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:15:31 -0400
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > It might be easier to take smaller steps, such as having a policy that
> > "any call for devs to use/test a new tool/service, or any service that
> > automatically performs trans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 2020/09/16 11:39, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 11:13 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>>
>>> +- at most one element containing
version
>>> + constraints used to determine stabilization candidates, as detailed
>>> + in `Stabil
Hi,
> However, we are still facing the same problem: Only one person is
> involved in development and knows how to run it. In case something will
> break again and Michał will be unavailable, we can’t just push a fix and
> watch a CI pipeline picking up and deploying new nattka. Instead someone
>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 1:17 AM Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:15:31 -0400
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > It might be easier to take smaller steps, such as having a policy that
> > "any call for devs to use/test a new tool/service, or any service that
> > automatically performs transa
Hi,
> When the latest release remains 'latest ~arch' for less than 3 days,
> stabilizing it after 30 days makes little sense. After all, people with
> frequent upgrade cycle will test it for no more than that, and people
> with infrequent upgrade cycle may miss the version entirely.
> Do you hav
# David Seifert (2020-09-16)
# EAPI 4, last release in 2001, the Fortran source code
# is terrible and has buffer overflows.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #664120, #742008.
sci-chemistry/ortep3
# Sam James (2020-09-16)
# Stuck on EAPI 4, only source is mirror://gentoo,
# unmaintained, HOMEPAGE gone.
app-admin/recursos
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
On 2020-09-16 Wed 09:36, Jonas Stein wrote:
> The heart of a distribution is basically its infrastructure and the
> tools to test, maintain and distribute packages.
>
> If a distribution relies on external sources, which are not maintained
> by the distribution, but a single person, it has been fo
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:44 AM Alec Warner wrote:
>
> - repomirror-ci and all the CI stuff is on infra because mgorny is also on
> infra! It's not like we set his stuff up for him; instead we gave him access
> to all the infra repos and he had to write his own puppet configs and
> whatnot. T
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:11:12 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> I realize this is a bit more tangential. I just think that infra is
> already a huge failure point, so having more stuff on infra actually
> makes that failure point more critical. A Gentoo where little is
> hosted on stuff we own is much
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:47:35 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> Seems like a way to improve this would be better documentation and a
> DIY infra testing platform.
>
> First, document how to prepare a service for infra hosting. Maybe
> provide an example service.
>
> Second, publish a tarball of a con
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:21:17PM +0200, David Seifert wrote:
> # David Seifert (2020-09-16)
> # EAPI 4, last release in 2001, the Fortran source code
> # is terrible and has buffer overflows.
> # Removal in 30 days. Bug #664120, #742008.
> sci-chemistry/ortep3
I can't see how this ebuild was w
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:05:49 -0600
Tim Harder wrote:
> Speaking for myself, I avoid hosting most of my Gentoo-related work
> (outside of gentoo repo ebuild mangling) on gentoo.org since I prefer
> the services offered elsewhere in terms of usability, visibility, and
> project maintenance. Take th
# Hans de Graaff (2020-09-17)
# Mask old unmaintained or obsolete ruby packages for removal in 30
# days.
# No longer maintained upstream, ruby27 issues, no deps
dev-ruby/bluecloth
# No longer maintained upstream, no deps
dev-ruby/calendar_date_select
# Obsolete, no deps
dev-ruby/capistrano-sta
21 matches
Mail list logo
