On 20/9/2005 7:37:19, Georgi Georgiev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> maillog: 20/09/2005-07:21:08(+0200): Christian Parpart types
> > On Monday 19 September 2005 15:22, warnera6 wrote:
> > > Mark Loeser wrote:
> > > > Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > > >> I think that dev-util is a very specific category co
maillog: 20/09/2005-09:37:23(+0300): Alin Nastac types
> Georgi Georgiev wrote:
>
> >- that package in my overlay that has net-wireless/gnome-phone-manager
> > in its *DEPENDs to work for as long as needed
> >
> >
> gnome-phone-manager can be found in portage tree under app-mobilephone
> catego
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
>- that package in my overlay that has net-wireless/gnome-phone-manager
> in its *DEPENDs to work for as long as needed
>
>
gnome-phone-manager can be found in portage tree under app-mobilephone
category.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
maillog: 20/09/2005-07:21:08(+0200): Christian Parpart types
> On Monday 19 September 2005 15:22, warnera6 wrote:
> > Mark Loeser wrote:
> > > Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > >> I think that dev-util is a very specific category containing
> > >> development utilities of some sort. There might be some
> >
On Monday 19 September 2005 15:22, warnera6 wrote:
> Mark Loeser wrote:
> > Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> >> I think that dev-util is a very specific category containing
> >> development utilities of some sort. There might be some
> >> misclassifications in them, but from a user perspective I don't reall
I'm masking app-arch/gzip-x86 as we speak. It seems to cause problems
for people[1] and is based off of gzip-1.3.3. As such, it is vulnerable
to a couple[2] exploits[3]. Upstream appears dead (last update was
2003-05-20) and no one is currently maintaining it for us. If you don't
want to see it
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 20:38 +0300, Alin Dobre wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alec Warner wrote:
> > Official policy states that CVS ebuilds should never be marked
> > stable[1]. Yet many ebuilds that are based on cvs sources and are
> > marked stable on arch's. I wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
> Official policy states that CVS ebuilds should never be marked
> stable[1]. Yet many ebuilds that are based on cvs sources and are
> marked stable on arch's. I would like to know why this is so.
>
> ./net-misc/netcomics-cvs/netc
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:48:43 + (UTC)
"John N. Laliberte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How to keep gtk1 off of your system:
> * use the proper, built in methods for this: add
> "=x11-libs/gtk+-1*" to /etc/portage/package.mask.
Since this may not be that easy for the end-user (lots of ebuilds
t
Official policy states that CVS ebuilds should never be marked
stable[1]. Yet many ebuilds that are based on cvs sources and are
marked stable on arch's. I would like to know why this is so.
./net-misc/netcomics-cvs/netcomics-cvs-0.14.1.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ~amd64"
./games-fps/blackshades-cvs
On Monday 19 September 2005 10:14, Rob Holland wrote:
> This is a gentle reminder that the UK Linux Expo is on 5th-6th October
> at Olympia, London. Gentoo will have a (small) booth at the expo, so if
> you are interested in being in the booth (dev's only I'm afraid) please
> let me know.
>
I just
Anthony Gorecki posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Mon, 12 Sep 2005 01:09:34 -0700:
> On Sunday, September 11, 2005 20:42, Daniel Ahlberg wrote:
>> The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the
> ebuilds.
>
> Why does this script no longer include the result
Mark Loeser wrote:
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
I think that dev-util is a very specific category containing
development utilities of some sort. There might be some
misclassifications in them, but from a user perspective I don't really
care about the language anything is written in. As C++ is so
wi
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 07:28 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 03:48:43PM +, John N. Laliberte wrote:
> > * "but you are taking away choice!" - If a program has both GTK2 and GTK3
> > interfaces, there are many ways to allow for testing of the experimental
> > interface. For
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
I think that dev-util is a very specific category containing development
utilities of some sort. There might be some misclassifications in them,
but from a user perspective I don't really care about the language
anything is written in. As C++ is so widespread I don't think
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 03:48:43PM +, John N. Laliberte wrote:
> * "but you are taking away choice!" - If a program has both GTK2 and GTK3
> interfaces, there are many ways to allow for testing of the experimental
> interface. For instance, package.mask with a revision number.
package.mask is
maillog: 19/09/2005-11:52:26(+0200): Paul de Vrieze types
> On Saturday 17 September 2005 22:06, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 September 2005 01:15 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 12:56:37 +0200 "Fernando J. Pereda"
> > >
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > | On S
On Saturday 17 September 2005 22:06, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 17 September 2005 01:15 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 12:56:37 +0200 "Fernando J. Pereda"
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 02:42:09AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > | | S
On Saturday 17 September 2005 22:24, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 September 2005 02:22 pm, Mark Loeser wrote:
> >>The reason for me adding that bit is the metadata from dev-cpp:
> >>
> >>The dev-cpp category contains libraries and utilities relevant to the
> >>c++ p
On Friday 16 September 2005 23:51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> that's the problem, there's no way to flag which packages should be
> consulted and which ones are a non-issue
This indeed kind of sums up my point.
Paul
--
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.de
All,
This is a gentle reminder that the UK Linux Expo is on 5th-6th October
at Olympia, London. Gentoo will have a (small) booth at the expo, so if
you are interested in being in the booth (dev's only I'm afraid) please
let me know.
I will be drawing up a rota on Wednesday, so if you've not repli
Hello.
On Пнд, 2005-09-19 at 20:24 +0900, Chris White wrote:
> I think the problem here isn't about choice, but support. Mainly deprication
> is the issue here. GTK2 was meant to be an upgrade of GTK1 interfaces. At
> some point upstream is going to have to giveup and say "Sorry sam, use gtk2
22 matches
Mail list logo
