Re: [gentoo-dev] Need guidance for updating CHOST

2006-09-13 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 07:40:01PM -0700, Richard Fish wrote: Is there a Readers Digest version you can give the userreps so we can at least answer the question properly when it comes up? The current version is text only and ugly, but at least there is one and from the feedback i got so far it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Toys for arch / release people

2006-09-13 Thread Francesco Riosa
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [...] I remain, Sirs, your most humble and obedient servant, ^^^ LOL -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] [Council] #gentoo-council

2006-09-13 Thread Danny van Dyk
Just a short note: The new council will be showing more presence in #gentoo-council. This means: even when no meeting is taking place you can reach us all together on IRC to discuss Gentoo development or to point out problems. Danny -- Danny van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo/AMD64 Project,

[gentoo-dev] using -j1 with distcc?

2006-09-13 Thread Aron Griffis
From bind-9.3.2-r4.ebuild: # idea from dev-libs/cyrus-sasl if has distcc ${FEATURES}; then einfo You have \distcc\ enabled einfo build with MAKEOPTS=\-j1\ jobs=-j1 else einfo build with MAKEOPTS=${MAKEOPTS} jobs= fi emake ${jobs} || die

Re: [gentoo-dev] using -j1 with distcc?

2006-09-13 Thread Brian Harring
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:34:52AM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote: From bind-9.3.2-r4.ebuild: # idea from dev-libs/cyrus-sasl if has distcc ${FEATURES}; then einfo You have \distcc\ enabled einfo build with MAKEOPTS=\-j1\ jobs=-j1 else einfo build

Re: [gentoo-dev] AutoMake and paralle safe makefiles [WAS: using -j1 with distcc?]

2006-09-13 Thread Alec Warner
Aron Griffis wrote: From bind-9.3.2-r4.ebuild: Unless somebody can explain how this is valid, I'll go ahead and fix the bind ebuilds (where fix means use -j1 unconditionally since the Makefiles aren't parallel safe). Aron If I'm using Autotools, aren't they smart enough (given that I specify

Re: [gentoo-dev] AutoMake and paralle safe makefiles [WAS: using -j1 with distcc?]

2006-09-13 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 16:51, Alec Warner wrote: If I'm using Autotools, aren't they smart enough (given that I specify the proper headers, and source files and whatnot) to generate parallel safe makefiles?  Or is it a shot in the dark as to whether it works or not? If you use automake,

Re: [gentoo-dev] AutoMake and paralle safe makefiles [WAS: using -j1 with distcc?]

2006-09-13 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:51:47 -0400 Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Aron Griffis wrote: | From bind-9.3.2-r4.ebuild: | | Unless somebody can explain how this is valid, I'll go ahead and fix | the bind ebuilds (where fix means use -j1 unconditionally since | the Makefiles aren't

Re: [gentoo-dev] using -j1 with distcc?

2006-09-13 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 07:52 -0700, Brian Harring wrote: On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:34:52AM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote: From bind-9.3.2-r4.ebuild: # idea from dev-libs/cyrus-sasl if has distcc ${FEATURES}; then einfo You have \distcc\ enabled einfo build with

Re: [gentoo-dev] using -j1 with distcc?

2006-09-13 Thread Aron Griffis
Brian Harring wrote: [Wed Sep 13 2006, 10:52:17AM EDT] Similar trickery in app-office/openoffice, although they enable -jN if distcc is enabled, else -j1 ... Always wondered how that was valid, just avoid OO compiles enough it wasn't something I ever got around to looking into :) The

Re: [gentoo-dev] using -j1 with distcc?

2006-09-13 Thread Aron Griffis
Aron Griffis wrote: [Wed Sep 13 2006, 10:34:52AM EDT] Unless somebody can explain how this is valid, I'll go ahead and fix the bind ebuilds (where fix means use -j1 unconditionally since the Makefiles aren't parallel safe). Maybe this was quick on my part, but I've gone ahead and fixed the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-13 Thread Benno Schulenberg
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: * If no existing file with the intended target name exists, or if the existing file has identical content to the file to be installed, the file to be installed is installed as normal. I would much prefer new files to be treated as if replacing an existing zero

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Council] #gentoo-council

2006-09-13 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Danny van Dyk wrote: Just a short note: The new council will be showing more presence in #gentoo-council. This means: even when no meeting is taking place you can reach us all together on IRC to discuss Gentoo development or to point out problems. Great! It's good to hear this. But how

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Council] #gentoo-council

2006-09-13 Thread Mike Doty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: Danny van Dyk wrote: Just a short note: The new council will be showing more presence in #gentoo-council. This means: even when no meeting is taking place you can reach us all together on IRC to discuss Gentoo development

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Council] #gentoo-council

2006-09-13 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 13:09 -0500, Mike Doty wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: Danny van Dyk wrote: Just a short note: The new council will be showing more presence in #gentoo-council. This means: even when no meeting is taking place you can

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-13 Thread Peter Volkov (pva)
On 2006-09-11 at 20:30 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: * If no existing file with the intended target name exists, or if the existing file has identical content to the file to be installed, the file to be installed is installed as normal. Just one poor

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-13 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 19:47 +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: * If no existing file with the intended target name exists, or if the existing file has identical content to the file to be installed, the file to be installed is installed as normal. I would much

Re: [gentoo-dev] using -j1 with distcc?

2006-09-13 Thread Konstantin V. Arkhipov
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 19:30, Aron Griffis wrote: Aron Griffis wrote: [Wed Sep 13 2006, 10:34:52AM EDT] Unless somebody can explain how this is valid, I'll go ahead and fix the bind ebuilds (where fix means use -j1 unconditionally since the Makefiles aren't parallel safe). Maybe

[gentoo-dev] Sunrise trusted committers with bugzilla access

2006-09-13 Thread Stefan Schweizer
To my fellow Gentoo developers, in the Sunrise project we have some users who are ambitious and cotribute more than a few ebuilds. Those regulars have the possibility to take the ebuild quiz and acquire the title Sunrise trusted committer. Those sunrise committers can use extended bugzilla

[gentoo-dev] treecleaner: package.mask cleanup

2006-09-13 Thread Steve Dibb
I just removed these no longer valid entries from package.mask since the packages have been removed from the tree: =net-dns/dnsmasq-2.21 =app-editors/vim-core-7.0_alpha* =app-editors/vim-7.0_alpha* =app-editors/gvim-7.0_alpha* Steve -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] colon separated variables in /etc/env.d/

2006-09-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 10 September 2006 21:44, Zac Medico wrote: For example, we can have a list of variable names stored in a new variable called COLON_SEPARATED that will reside in either the profiles or /etc/env.d/ itself. /etc/env.d makes most sense ... we just have to worry about how to handle the

Re: [gentoo-dev] colon separated variables in /etc/env.d/

2006-09-13 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sunday 10 September 2006 21:44, Zac Medico wrote: For example, we can have a list of variable names stored in a new variable called COLON_SEPARATED that will reside in either the profiles or /etc/env.d/ itself.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Toys for arch / release people

2006-09-13 Thread Doug Goldstein
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: If anyone has any other suggestions for this kind of user configuration independent tool, give me a prod here or in #paludis. Writing these is really trivial and almost certainly worth the effort... I remain, Sirs, your most humble and obedient servant, Ciaran,

[gentoo-dev] planet gentoo upgrade

2006-09-13 Thread Steve Dibb
Planet Gentoo's backend got upgraded today, so if anyone notices any weird funkies, please let me know. Thanks for beta-testing. :) Steve -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list