Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
sed -ne ${lineno}p ${filename}
Anyone got something better?
that sed will probably work about half the time since it'll only work on one
liners ...
Print one or two lines before and after ${lineno} and highlight
On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 05:14 Wed 26 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
if it's all common shell, it's pretty hard to hide ... you could try some
tricks like rewriting USE to __USE__ so internal code (like the `use`
function) still work, but in the end, does
On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 17:53 Wed 26 Sep , Doug Goldstein wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
also, ebuilds do change over time, so what line # may be correct one
day may not be relevant the next ...
True. I will concede this
Hans de Graaff (graaff) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Modified: ChangeLog
Added:imagemagick-6.3.5.10.ebuild
Log:
Version bump: bug 193737
src_install() {
make DESTDIR=${D} install || die
emake not possible?
[...]
dodoc NEWS ChangeLog AUTHORS
On 06:56 Thu 27 Sep , Hans de Graaff (graaff) wrote:
1.1 media-gfx/imagemagick/imagemagick-6.3.5.10.ebuild
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/media-gfx/imagemagick/imagemagick-6.3.5.10.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup
plain:
Thursday, 27. September 2007, Donnie Berkholz Ви написали:
+ if [[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] == ${MARKER}* ]]; then
+ exit
I'm surprised to see exit called in a function instead of returning
nonzero.
This exit here indicates not a very usual but a valid situation, - no gnat
profile
On Thursday 27 September 2007, George Shapovalov wrote:
Thursday, 27. September 2007, Donnie Berkholz Ви написали:
+ if [[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] == ${MARKER}* ]]; then
+ exit
I'm surprised to see exit called in a function instead of returning
nonzero.
This exit here indicates
On 07:34 Thu 27 Sep , Ali Polatel (hawking) wrote:
1.1 dev-python/rpy/rpy-0.99.2-r1.ebuild
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-python/rpy/rpy-0.99.2-r1.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup
plain:
Thursday, 27. September 2007, Mike Frysinger Ви написали:
i think more to the point, ebuilds/eclasses should never be calling `exit`
if you want to return an empty string, then you do `return`
Ok, sorry, will fix.
Any pointers to some description of where each should be used? Is this
about the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Who's gonna fix usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh?
what's broken in it ?
-mike
Well, apparently it checking FEATURES is illegal, plus it seems that it
contains
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
how about this:
[...]
+ | (OFS=${IFS} IFS=$'\n'; while read -r n ; do (IFS=${OFS};
eerror
${n}) ; done)
This is rather ugly. These IFS games are to allow for leading
whitespace, right?
Can't you do something like xargs -d'\n' -n1
Did your work have anything to do with the e-mails from bugzilla-daemon only
containing HTTPS links? I noticed that over the previous few days.
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 22:04:40 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I went and processed a bunch of pending Bugzilla bugs, and thought folk
might be
On Wed, 2007-26-09 at 19:04 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I went and processed a bunch of pending Bugzilla bugs, and thought folk
might be interested in the changes.
- Do not reply note at the top of bugmail, and a related Reply-To
header. [Bug #181172]
Is this really required? It pushes
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 07:13:05AM -0400, Thomas Anderson wrote:
Did your work have anything to do with the e-mails from bugzilla-daemon only
containing HTTPS links? I noticed that over the previous few days.
That got fixed as well, but a while before I did this big pass.
--
Robin Hugh
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:05:28PM +0300, Olivier Cr?te wrote:
Is this really required? It pushes the real content even farther down
the window. Or if you really want to keep it for new users, please allow
us to disable that.
Bugzilla does not generate the mail once per user, but rather once
On Thursday 27 September 2007, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
how about this:
[...]
+ | (OFS=${IFS} IFS=$'\n'; while read -r n ; do (IFS=${OFS};
eerror
${n}) ; done)
This is rather ugly. These IFS games are to allow for leading
On Thursday 27 September 2007, George Shapovalov wrote:
Thursday, 27. September 2007, Mike Frysinger Ви написали:
i think more to the point, ebuilds/eclasses should never be calling
`exit`
if you want to return an empty string, then you do `return`
Ok, sorry, will fix.
Any pointers to
On Thursday 27 September 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Who's gonna fix usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh?
what's broken in it ?
-mike
Well, apparently it checking FEATURES is illegal
you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 27 September 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Who's gonna fix usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh?
what's broken in it ?
-mike
On Thursday, 27. September 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:05:28PM +0300, Olivier Cr?te wrote:
Is this really required? It pushes the real content even farther
down the window. Or if you really want to keep it for new users,
please allow us to disable that.
Robin H. Johnson kirjoitti:
- Use site-specific link color instead of browser-provided, for
visibility when browser default is too light. [Bug #185760]
Is the value we are using different from what Firefox uses by default?
It looks a bit too bright to me.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
+ | (OFS=${IFS} IFS=$'\n'; while read -r n ; do (IFS=${OFS};
eerror
${n}) ; done)
Can't you do something like xargs -d'\n' -n1 eerror?
the BSD wankers would complain their xargs doesnt support -d
That's true. Then:
sed 's/^/X/'
Am Donnerstag 27 September 2007 schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
This thing is packed with quoting issues for S, D and FILESDIR, and the
pkg_* functions don't respect ROOT.
Quotes done. About pkg_ and ROOT: Didn't find any issues here. python_mod_*
seems to care about that itself. Found one issue in
On Thursday 27 September 2007 14:00:37 Mike Frysinger wrote:
the BSD wankers
Better to wank over the Devil instead of being buggered by a pengiun :P
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Good job, thanks!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:01:33 -0600
Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone put something in the dev guide about this? I was
looking for exactly this answer a week or so ago and couldn't find
anything. ;)
Maybe it's a clue that [1] does /not/ mention FEATURES as a variable to
be used
Guys, it's nice that you have so interesting discussions, but let me just
state that I haven't written this code. I just did a trivial copy-over-bump.
If anyone wants to improve the ebuild, feel free do go ahead and commit your
changes.
--
Hanno Böck Blog: http://www.hboeck.de/
Hi,
Everytime I'm sending out a mail with my gentoo.org-address, I get
this certificate may be unsecure message. Gentoo mailserver (and forums,
bugzilla and probably many more) use self-signed ssl-certificates.
Well, I hope I don't have to tell that self-signed certs are not really good
Hanno Böck kirjoitti:
I think compared to self-signed, having cacert-certificates would be a big
improvement. Many other free software projects (and more and more other
pages) use cacert, so it becomes more and more likely that people will
already have the cacert-root-cert installed.
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 05:14 Wed 26 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
if it's all common shell, it's pretty hard to hide ... you could try some
tricks like rewriting USE to __USE__ so internal code (like the `use`
function) still work, but in the end, does that really help ?
I think so.
Hanno Böck wrote:
I think compared to self-signed, having cacert-certificates would be a big
improvement. Many other free software projects (and more and more other
pages) use cacert, so it becomes more and more likely that people will
already have the cacert-root-cert installed.
How does a
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 17:53 Wed 26 Sep , Doug Goldstein wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
also, ebuilds do change over time, so what line # may be correct one
day may not be relevant the next ...
Which could bring up a point of would it be useful to see if
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 13:15 Wed 26 Sep , Mart Raudsepp (leio) wrote:
mv ${D}/usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.py \
${D}/usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.py-2.0
mv ${D}/usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.pth \
Hi,
could there be side effects setting MAKEOPTS in the ebuild (in global
scope)?
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 27 September 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
Robin H. Johnson kirjoitti:
- Use site-specific link color instead of browser-provided, for
visibility when browser default is too light. [Bug #185760]
Is the value we are using different from what Firefox uses by default?
It looks a bit
On Thursday 27 September 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
could there be side effects setting MAKEOPTS in the ebuild (in global
scope)?
you should only be incrementing, never setting ... anything that sets it is
broken while anything that increments it is considered bad form, but
currently
Am Donnerstag 27 September 2007 schrieb Andrew Gaffney:
How does a CAcert certificate help? Their own certificate for
https://www.cacert.org/ can't be verified by Firefox 2.0.0.7, which tells
me that their CA isn't trusted by default.
They're workin on that, goal is to include in ff. But
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday 27 September 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
could there be side effects setting MAKEOPTS in the ebuild (in
global scope)?
you should only be incrementing, never setting ... anything that sets
it is broken while anything that increments it is
On Thursday 27 September 2007, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
+| (OFS=${IFS} IFS=$'\n'; while read -r n ; do
(IFS=${OFS}; eerror
${n}) ; done)
Can't you do something like xargs -d'\n' -n1 eerror?
the BSD wankers would
On N, 2007-09-27 at 17:08 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 13:15 Wed 26 Sep , Mart Raudsepp (leio) wrote:
mv ${D}/usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.py \
${D}/usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.py-2.0
mv
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok, so the latter saves me from repeating all standard functions
with emake -j1. Thanks.
sorry, i'll be a bit more specific ... the reason appending MAKEOPTS
has been sliding is due to the large volume of gnome ebuilds and
integrated eclasses ... it isnt
On Thursday 27 September 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday 27 September 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
could there be side effects setting MAKEOPTS in the ebuild (in
global scope)?
you should only be incrementing, never setting ...
On Thursday 27 September 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
also, any package that fails -j1 building should have an open bug
about it ... parallel building isnt something to be workedaround with
-j1 and then ignored as it can severely screw people (consider
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
Hanno Böck wrote:
I think compared to self-signed, having cacert-certificates would be
a big improvement. Many other free software projects (and more and
more other pages) use cacert, so it becomes more and more likely that
people will already have the cacert-root-cert
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I went and processed a bunch of pending Bugzilla bugs, and thought folk
might be interested in the changes.
- Bug Reporting Guide is now linked from the front page as well as the
Choose Product page (during bug creation). [Bug #188687]
- The Log In link in the
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 05:23:26PM +0200, Hanno B??ck wrote:
Well, I hope I don't have to tell that self-signed certs are not really good
security policy.
Whether or not self-signed certs are secure or insecure depends entirely
on your definition of 'secure'.
- Is the traffic encrypted between
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:31:00PM +0200, Robert Buchholz wrote:
Is it possible to display the text only once when blocking bugs change?
Especially because of the please visit in the middle isn't followed by
a link.
Should be fixed now.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer Infra Guy
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 05:23:26PM +0200, Hanno B??ck wrote:
Well, I hope I don't have to tell that self-signed certs are not really good
security policy.
Whether or not self-signed certs are secure or insecure depends entirely
on your definition of 'secure'.
- Is the traffic encrypted
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:47:36PM -0400, Caleb Tennis wrote:
Is there a reason that my Godaddy suggestion in the bug isn't being
considered?
Regardless of what you may think of them as a company, they offer the same
free type
of certificate to open source projects just like cacert, and
49 matches
Mail list logo
