This is your one-day friendly reminder ! The monthly Gentoo Council
meeting is tomorrow in #gentoo-council on irc.freenode.net. See the
channel topic for the exact time (but it's probably 2000 UTC).
If you're supposed to show up, please show up. If you're not supposed
to show up, then show up
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 12:13:40 pm Petteri Räty wrote:
Robert R. Russell wrote:
My personal opinion on this matter is pick one of the following:
1) perform the bugfix without a version bump and remain at the current
EAPI version
2) perform the bugfix with a version bump and remain
Robert R. Russell wrote:
My answer is a simple example from my own system. My current system uses a
motherboard that is around 6 months old and is only correctly supported by
the latest ~arch gentoo-sources. The add on video card, a 1 to 2 year old
nvidia card, works great with
On 23:35 Tue 09 Dec , Federico Ferri wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
As I mentioned on IRC, I think this isn't a very general use case
(given the existence of --resume, --keep-going, etc.) so code to
accomplish it
the point was not resuming my emerge because the laptop hung. was more
why offlist?
Robert R. Russell wrote:
Stabilization reports for ~xorg-x11 and the ~xf86-video-intel drivers aren't
likely to go any where given the number of issues people are asking about on
the forums
But the important thing is that you notify the maintainers that you're
in trouble. That
On 15:35 Mon 01 Dec , Joe Peterson wrote:
However, what I see as perhaps a missing piece is more conceptual: the
important connection between the valuable info in the emerge logs (and their
somewhat transient default nature) and what a user looks for when he/she has a
problem with a
On 19:08 Mon 17 Nov , Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
That would people require to use common sense. The past has shown that
people tend to have different views of what common sense might be in a
given case. Therefore policy in that aspect needs to be as clear and
understandable as possible to
On 13:13 Mon 10 Nov , Mark Loeser wrote:
Instead of addressing archs as being slackers or not, this addresses it
as a more granular layer of looking at ebuilds. Thanks to Richard
Freeman for the initial proposal that I based this off of. Please give me
feedback on this proposal, if you
On 10:44 Wed 12 Nov , Michael Hammer wrote:
* Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081112 00:46]:
What issues do you see with having a wiki?
Pages of poor quality with wrong informations.
The wiki already exists and is popular, so these already happen. Even if
it's not official it says
On 16:52 Tue 11 Nov , Joe Peterson wrote:
As for Wikipedia, there is always the fear that the info will be
incorrect, but time has shown that wikis tend to be very accurate and
get corrected quickly when not.
A page's likelihood of correctness is roughly inversely proportional to
its
On 14:47 Mon 01 Dec , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Please give the OK on the following, assuming no objections crop up
before then:
* [RFC] Label profiles with EAPI for compatibility checks (revised)
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_930f58fcebcbbcbe523c001f2c825179.xml
* EAPI
Maintainers,
please see
http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/misc/rindex/media-video/ffmpeg
and check if your package is compatible with latest FFMPEG in tree. If
it's not, you still have few weeks time to fix your package. Otherwise
it will be wiped from tree by treecleaners and media herds.
Also, if
12 matches
Mail list logo
