Nikos Chantziaras schrieb:
> This is a heads-up to all devs who provide/maintain live ebuilds of
> projects hosted on SourceForge. Live ebuilds won't work anymore.
> EGIT_REPO_URI has to updated on all ebuilds. Appending "/projectname"
> should be enough (for example,
> "git://lmms.git.sourceforg
Mounir Lamouri posted on Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:27:34 +0200 as excerpted:
> Rémi Cardona wrote:
>> Mounir Lamouri a écrit :
>>> Duncan wrote:
Sebastian Pipping posted:
> However I do notice that "GPL-2+" could make things easier. Why not
> introduce a license group for it like @GPL-
Eray Aslan wrote:
On 03.09.2009 05:38, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
- xfce4-meta : former name xfce-base/xfce4. Renamed to reflect reality.
This meta package is the *core* of XFCE, it *only* has in it what is
required to run. Thus, returning XFCE to a minimalistic status in Gentoo
Linux. This is desired
Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Le 03/09/2009 23:10, Mounir Lamouri a écrit :
>> Duncan wrote:
>>> Sebastian Pipping posted on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:21:49 +0200 as
>>> excerpted:
>>>
>>>
However I do notice that "GPL-2+" could make things easier. Why not
introduce a license group for it like @GPL-2+
Le 03/09/2009 23:10, Mounir Lamouri a écrit :
Duncan wrote:
Sebastian Pipping posted on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:21:49 +0200 as excerpted:
However I do notice that "GPL-2+" could make things easier. Why not
introduce a license group for it like @GPL-2+ or so, instead? That would
be transparent and
Duncan wrote:
> Sebastian Pipping posted on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:21:49 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>
>> However I do notice that "GPL-2+" could make things easier. Why not
>> introduce a license group for it like @GPL-2+ or so, instead? That would
>> be transparent and use existing means.
>>
>
> I
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Mounir Lamouri wrote:
>
>> It's even worst when we try to use ACCEPT_LICENSE to have a free
>> operating system. Let's suppose 'free' in fsf free and osf free,
>> LGPL-2.1 is free for both but LGPL-2 isn't and we can suppose, most
>> LGPL-2 licensed packages in the tre
This is a heads-up to all devs who provide/maintain live ebuilds of
projects hosted on SourceForge. Live ebuilds won't work anymore.
EGIT_REPO_URI has to updated on all ebuilds. Appending "/projectname"
should be enough (for example,
"git://lmms.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/lmms" should become
Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Le 01/09/2009 00:12, Mounir Lamouri a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> As you should know, GLEP 23 [1] introduced USE flags conditions in
>> LICENSE variable and || operator in addition of licenses groups and
>> ACCEPT_LICENSE variable.
>>
>> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-00
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Is this dead before it even began? I'm getting no replies from
> yng...@gentoo.org.
He is away:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/roll-call/devaway.xml?select=yngwin#yngwin
On 08/11/2009 01:28 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
[...]
So hereby we announce the Gentoo Multimedia overlay. It is located at
http://gitorious.org/gentoo-multimedia and any developers who want to
join can let us know their gitorious account name, so they can be added.
Administration of the overlay will
11 matches
Mail list logo