Duncan wrote:
> Sebastian Pipping posted on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:21:49 +0200 as excerpted:
>> However I do notice that "GPL-2+" could make things easier. Why not
>> introduce a license group for it like @GPL-2+ or so, instead? That would
>> be transparent and use existing means.
> I've always thought Gentoo needed "plus" versions of the versioned 
> licenses, anyway.  GPL-2, GPL-2+, GPL-3, and GPL-3+, should all be 
> different licenses, because really, they are.
AFAIK, GPL-2 and GPL-2+ are not different, may you tell me more about that ?


Reply via email to