Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Le 03/09/2009 23:10, Mounir Lamouri a écrit :
>> Duncan wrote:
>>> Sebastian Pipping posted on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:21:49 +0200 as
>>> excerpted:
>>>> However I do notice that "GPL-2+" could make things easier. Why not
>>>> introduce a license group for it like @GPL-2+ or so, instead? That
>>>> would
>>>> be transparent and use existing means.
>>> I've always thought Gentoo needed "plus" versions of the versioned
>>> licenses, anyway.  GPL-2, GPL-2+, GPL-3, and GPL-3+, should all be
>>> different licenses, because really, they are.
>> AFAIK, GPL-2 and GPL-2+ are not different, may you tell me more about
>> that ?
> GPL-2+ means "GPL-2 GPL-3 GPL-4 ..."
> Not quite the same thing as just "GPL-2"
But the content of the license is the same. That only means you can use
a newer one.
I mean we do not need a new license file for that. It's up to upstream
to write somewhere if it's GPL-2 or GPL-2+, am I right ?


Reply via email to