Rémi Cardona wrote: > Le 01/09/2009 00:12, Mounir Lamouri a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> As you should know, GLEP 23  introduced USE flags conditions in >> LICENSE variable and || operator in addition of licenses groups and >> ACCEPT_LICENSE variable. >> >>  http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0023.html > > /me still thinks LICENSE should be informational _at_best_. Users who > rely on LICENSE to build an FSF-approved system will simply be mislead. > > If we want to support this sort of things properly, we should have a > treewide license audit. Anything short of that will just be a > disservice to our users. I don't think your argument is valid. LICENSE is not informational so we have to deal with it and as GLEP-23 has an issue, we should fix it. I know even with this feature building a free-only system with ACCEPT_LICENSE will not be easy but the tree cleaning or anything else is a next step. Let's focus on what we can do now and what I propose is clearly doable and it will not break anything.