[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project

2010-04-08 Thread Duncan
Patrick Nagel posted on Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:42:40 +0800 as excerpted: > On 2010-04-08 19:51 UTC Ryan Hill wrote: >> >> why are we setting up a user wiki when a very popular one already >> exists? it seems like a complete duplication of effort. i'm not saying >> don't do it, i'm just baffled why

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project

2010-04-08 Thread Patrick Nagel
Hi, On 2010-04-08 19:51 UTC Ryan Hill wrote: > On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:12:49 +0200 > > Ben de Groot wrote: > > After the mostly positive feedback on the recent wiki discussion, we > > have now gone ahead, formed a preliminary team consisting of both > > users and developers, and put up a project p

RE: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project

2010-04-08 Thread Sylvain Alain
Indeed, that's why I don't want to have a wiki for devs only. The Gentoo wiki must be for the community and by the community :P There are many Gentoo experts that don't want to be officially devs. d2_racing > To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org > From: dirtye...@gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-dev]

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project

2010-04-08 Thread Ryan Hill
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:37:46 + Sylvain Alain wrote: > > The official wiki can be use by powerusers who want to write some pretty good > doc. > > A lot of powerusers can write excellent doc on the gentoo forum right now, so > they don't need to by Gentoo Dev to right excellent stuff. > > I

RE: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project

2010-04-08 Thread Sylvain Alain
The official wiki can be use by powerusers who want to write some pretty good doc. A lot of powerusers can write excellent doc on the gentoo forum right now, so they don't need to by Gentoo Dev to right excellent stuff. I don't see your point. > To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org > From: dir

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Pheonix] Heartbeat team force

2010-04-08 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 04/08/10 21:16, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> Current results >> === >> Bug load per developer >> -- >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~sping/bug-heartbeat/report--bug-count-by-person.html > What's the actua

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project

2010-04-08 Thread Ryan Hill
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:13:07 +0200 Ben de Groot wrote: > On 8 April 2010 21:51, Ryan Hill wrote: > > why are we setting up a user wiki when a very popular one already exists? > > Because some devs request things like this: > > > can we can lock certain pages down to dev edits only? > > In our

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project

2010-04-08 Thread Ben de Groot
On 8 April 2010 21:51, Ryan Hill wrote: > why are we setting up a user wiki when a very popular one already exists? Because some devs request things like this: > can we can lock certain pages down to dev edits only? In our wiki we will be able to. Cheers, -- Ben de Groot Gentoo Qt project lea

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project

2010-04-08 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:12:49 +0200 Ben de Groot wrote: > After the mostly positive feedback on the recent wiki discussion, we > have now gone ahead, formed a preliminary team consisting of both > users and developers, and put up a project page [1]. All constructive > feedback on this new project i

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Pheonix] Heartbeat team force

2010-04-08 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Current results > === > Bug load per developer > -- > http://dev.gentoo.org/~sping/bug-heartbeat/report--bug-count-by-person.html What's the actual math that you're using (it wasn't clear in your re

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting 19 April 2010

2010-04-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:08:57 +0200 Patrick Lauer wrote: > > Please detail your cycle breaking algorithm that works in such a way > > that it's guaranteed not to toggle flags that will break a system, > > but that does not require any changes to be made to ebuilds etc > > telling the package manage

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting 19 April 2010

2010-04-08 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 04/08/10 15:29, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 05:02:25 -0700 > Brian Harring wrote: >> 4) if there are questions re: use cycle breaking or other bits, feel >> free to ask prior please- council meeting times unfortunately right >> now intersect badly with my paying work so it's h

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting 19 April 2010

2010-04-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 05:02:25 -0700 Brian Harring wrote: > 4) if there are questions re: use cycle breaking or other bits, feel > free to ask prior please- council meeting times unfortunately right > now intersect badly with my paying work so it's hard to be online to > answer questions during th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting 19 April 2010

2010-04-08 Thread Brian Harring
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:05:34AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Next monthly council meeting will be at 19 April 2010, 18:00 UTC > in #gentoo-council. > > If you have any topics you want us to discuss or even vote about, > simply followup to this message. VALID_USE- http://archives.gentoo.org/g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting 19 April 2010

2010-04-08 Thread Petteri Räty
On 04/07/2010 12:05 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Next monthly council meeting will be at 19 April 2010, 18:00 UTC > in #gentoo-council. > > If you have any topics you want us to discuss or even vote about, > simply followup to this message. > > Ulrich > Two things already discussed on this maili

[gentoo-dev] Re: [Gentoo Pheonix] Heartbeat team force

2010-04-08 Thread Torsten Veller
* Sebastian Pipping : > i was refering to the members of the embedded herd. > the rendered page lists > >dagger, kumba, pebenito, solar > > to be working for that herd. the link you gave does not > contain the word "dagger". how does it get in there? >From herds.xml. Really.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Pheonix] Heartbeat team force

2010-04-08 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 04/07/10 21:24, Ben de Groot wrote: >> with the herd "embedded" it's difficult though: the page >> >> lists members for it but the page source does not >> hold it, explicitly. where does it come from? > > It does, as can be seen in > http