When removal of a symlink is triggered by removal of the directory
that it points to, revisit the parent directories of the symlink.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/640058
---
pym/portage/dbapi/vartree.py | 23 +--
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:35:57 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> ...and the git hook would've rejected them because they aren't signed
> by a Gentoo developer.
Fair enough. I suspect in line with the other comments, it would be
optimal if said commit hook mentioned something along the lines of:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 17:35:41 -0700
Raymond Jennings wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:47 PM Brian Dolbec
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 11:49:37 -0700
> > Raymond Jennings wrote:
> >
> > > In that case, I vote for /var/cache/portage, since that's
> > > literally what purpose it
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:47 PM Brian Dolbec wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 11:49:37 -0700
> Raymond Jennings wrote:
>
> > In that case, I vote for /var/cache/portage, since that's literally
> > what purpose it serves. Namely, the cache of the gentoo infra's
> > current copy of teh portage
> I guess /var/portage is not a terrible choice.
Well, I double that.
I've already use the following structure:
|- /var/portage/
| |- repos
| | |- gentoo
| | |- reponame1
| | |- reponame2
| |- distfiles
| | |- ...
| | |- ...
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:13:57PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu czw, 12.07.2018 o godzinie 15∶51 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman
> napisał:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 3:47 PM Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > >
> > > So, "portage" should not be a directory name in the new default path.
> > >
> >
W dniu czw, 12.07.2018 o godzinie 15∶51 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman
napisał:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 3:47 PM Brian Dolbec wrote:
> >
> > So, "portage" should not be a directory name in the new default path.
> >
>
> Well, in my examples I proposed it as that is the software that
> created
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 3:47 PM Brian Dolbec wrote:
>
> So, "portage" should not be a directory name in the new default path.
>
Well, in my examples I proposed it as that is the software that
created the path, but then again in the spirit of PMS portage isn't
the only PM.
So:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 11:49:37 -0700
Raymond Jennings wrote:
> In that case, I vote for /var/cache/portage, since that's literally
> what purpose it serves. Namely, the cache of the gentoo infra's
> current copy of teh portage tree.
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:00 AM Alec Warner
> wrote:
> >
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 3:34 PM konsolebox wrote:
>
> I have /var/lib/gentoo/portage defined in repos.conf/gentoo.conf.
>
Regardless of the base directory location, I might suggest a path
dedicated to repositories, of which the main gentoo repo is just an
initial one, and overlays could be
I have /var/lib/gentoo/portage defined in repos.conf/gentoo.conf.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 2:50 AM Raymond Jennings wrote:
> In that case, I vote for /var/cache/portage, since that's literally
> what purpose it serves. Namely, the cache of the gentoo infra's
> current copy of teh portage tree.
>
In that case, I vote for /var/cache/portage, since that's literally
what purpose it serves. Namely, the cache of the gentoo infra's
current copy of teh portage tree.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:00 AM Alec Warner wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
>>
>> Just for
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Raymond Jennings
wrote:
> Just for the record, but would putting a setting inside
> /etc/portage/make.conf be the appropriate way to handle this?
>
>
The settings already exist (and have existed for 10 years.) This bikeshed
discussion is literally trying to
Just for the record, but would putting a setting inside
/etc/portage/make.conf be the appropriate way to handle this?
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 02:59:03 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> Account for repoman modifications of the portdbapi self.settings
> reference, and treat all flags as valid for the empty profile
> because it does not have any implicit IUSE settings.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/660982
> ---
>
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:16 PM William Hubbs wrote:
>
> That is the other part of this debate, some are saying /var/lib, and
> others are saying /var/db.
>
> It turns out that /var/db is much more common than I thought it was
> (it exists in all *bsd variants at least), so that could be an
Am Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2018, 18:19:39 CEST schrieb Alec Warner:
> [...]
>
> +1 to this. The challenge (in moving it) is that its been "/usr/portage"
> for a long time so many tools
> may have hard coded this location; as opposed to querying portage for where
> the tree is, e.g.:
>
>
Account for repoman modifications of the portdbapi self.settings
reference, and treat all flags as valid for the empty profile
because it does not have any implicit IUSE settings.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/660982
---
pym/_emerge/Package.py| 5 -
pym/portage/dbapi/__init__.py | 16
# Michał Górny (12 Jul 2018)
# Abandoned upstream, no reverse dependencies. Collides with
# dev-python/promises (that has revdeps).
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #651156.
dev-python/promise
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
W dniu czw, 12.07.2018 o godzinie 15∶52 +1200, użytkownik Kent Fredric
napisał:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 10:40:22 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail addresses
> > for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority
W dniu wto, 10.07.2018 o godzinie 09∶38 -0400, użytkownik kuzetsa
napisał:
> > The only issue I see is that of slight complications on handling the
> > different addresses for author and commit, that's all that comes to
> > mind.
> >
> >
> > Mart
> >
>
> I think authorship is a good point /
On Thursday, 12 July 2018 07:21:20 CEST Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jul 2018, Richard Yao wrote:
> > This does not answer my question. Is it really a FHS violation? The
> > contents of /usr changes when doing updates using the system package
> > manager. When not doing updates, it
22 matches
Mail list logo
