Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-07 Thread Oskari Pirhonen
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 08:26:15 +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote: > I _believe_ ago's tinderbox isn't being paid by the GF _anymore_ due to > this reason, but he keeps it running with his own expenses. I don't mind > this as long as the results are desirable and not phony. I still see a > lot of value

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-07 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 8.11.2022 2.23, Rich Freeman wrote: > > Of course if somebody wants to contribute to 100% FOSS tinderbox > efforts that would be even better. Perhaps if our 100% FOSS tinderbox > efforts addressed our needs very well, then nobody would want to > bother with the proprietary reports, or

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-07 Thread Arthur Zamarin
On 06/11/2022 10.34, Sam James wrote: > > ... > > That had two parts: > 1. https://github.com/projg2/nattka/issues/72 & > https://github.com/projg2/nattka/pull/73 (done) > 2. https://github.com/arthurzam/tattoo/issues/1 (not done) I was waiting for nattka-0.4 (which returns the field value)

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] verify-sig.eclass: Workaround GPG problems with long TMPDIR

2022-11-07 Thread Michał Górny
Force using TMPDIR=/tmp to workaround GPG failing when TMPDIR happens to be long enough to cause UNIX socket paths to exceed the system limit. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/854492 Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- eclass/verify-sig.eclass | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] font.eclass: Remove racy pkg_postinst code

2022-11-07 Thread Sam James
> On 8 Nov 2022, at 01:10, Matt Turner wrote: > > Noticed on ChromeOS when installing a large number of font packages in > parallel: > > /usr/share/fonts/noto/NotoSerifThai-Regular.ttf#new' from 0004 (--r--) to > 2440 (r--r-S---) > * ERROR: media-fonts/ipaex-004.01-r1::chromiumos failed

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-python/influxdb

2022-11-07 Thread Christopher Head
I no longer use InfluxDB. The ebuild is at version 5.3.0, while upstream is at 5.3.1, so it’s only one micro version out of date. The ebuild declares compatibility up to Python 3.10. It’s a pretty simple package. -- Christopher Head pgp3yBZ2Nmwn_.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] font.eclass: Remove racy pkg_postinst code

2022-11-07 Thread Matt Turner
Noticed on ChromeOS when installing a large number of font packages in parallel: /usr/share/fonts/noto/NotoSerifThai-Regular.ttf#new' from 0004 (--r--) to 2440 (r--r-S---) * ERROR: media-fonts/ipaex-004.01-r1::chromiumos failed (postinst phase): * failed to fix font files perms The "#new"

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] media-fonts/x11fonts-jmk: Install files with 0644 permissions

2022-11-07 Thread Matt Turner
font.eclass has some racy code in pkg_postinst() that changes permissions of already-installed files. I want to remove that to avoid the race. This is the only package that installs fonts with permissions other than 0644, so override that in src_install(). The claim in font.eclass is that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 7:34 PM John Helmert III wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 07:23:33PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > > Proprietary tools do contribute to this since they can > > generate results that are harder to reproduce, but if they are clear > > and accurate and actionable it could

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-07 Thread John Helmert III
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 07:23:33PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 6:16 PM Sam James wrote: > > > > > On 7 Nov 2022, at 06:07, Oskari Pirhonen wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:37:24 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: > > >> I would be in favour of stepping up the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-07 Thread Sam James
> On 8 Nov 2022, at 00:23, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 6:16 PM Sam James wrote: >> >>> On 7 Nov 2022, at 06:07, Oskari Pirhonen wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:37:24 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: I would be in favour of stepping up the social contract and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 6:16 PM Sam James wrote: > > > On 7 Nov 2022, at 06:07, Oskari Pirhonen wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:37:24 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: > >> I would be in favour of stepping up the social contract and actually > >> prohibiting this kind of things, we had that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-07 Thread Sam James
> On 7 Nov 2022, at 06:07, Oskari Pirhonen wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:37:24 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: >> I would be in favour of stepping up the social contract and actually >> prohibiting this kind of things, we had that before too, the nattka you >> mgorny wrote is replacement

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-07 Thread John Helmert III
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 08:26:15AM +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 7.11.2022 8.07, Oskari Pirhonen wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:37:24 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: > >> I would be in favour of stepping up the social contract and actually > >> prohibiting this kind of things, we had