> On 7 Nov 2022, at 06:07, Oskari Pirhonen <xxc3ncore...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:37:24 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: >> I would be in favour of stepping up the social contract and actually >> prohibiting this kind of things, we had that before too, the nattka you >> mgorny wrote is replacement for old bugzilla bot that was ... >> closedsource and perished, though nattka now have way more features than >> the old thing ever had. > > As a user, I think it would be really cool if there was a requirement > that all infra and infra-adjacent stuff was free software. > > I feel like I've read that Debian already has something like this. While > doing some quick searches I didn't find a full-on requirement, but all > their infra bits I did find were powered by free software. The most > relevant ones being buildd [1] and debci [2]. Additionally, the debci > docs has inctructions on reproducing tests yourself [3] which is a nice > extra IMO.
Gentoo has https://www.gentoo.org/get-started/philosophy/social-contract.html. Best, sam
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
