Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Saturday 05 November 2005 03:53, Alec Joseph Warner wrote:
>
>>As far as including news in the tree goes, news is repository bound
>>information. Each repository may in fact have relevant news, and in
>>preparation for multiple repositories this is how the news should be
just have to wonder why the hell it's in use.defaults in the
first place.
I'm also a bit worried that things were placed in there a while ago and
are no longer needed, may also be a good idea to date the entries.
- -Alec Warner (antarus)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:05:37AM -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
>
>>Could we by chance, mandate some sort of comment field in that file not
>>unlike package.mask?
>
>
> what really needs explanation ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:08:45AM -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
>
>>Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:05:37AM -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:34:05 -0500 Andrew Muraco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | 2. What choices/options are on the table for this feature?
>
> The big controversy seems to be over whether repositories carry a
> unique identi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:36:54 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | emerge blar --repo=ciaranmssekritrepo
> |
> | This accomplishes the same thing, except I get to name the repo
> | whate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've actually been tinkering with this idea for a whole mostly due to
the gross amount of crazy crap that is posted to gentoo-wiki.com ( no
offense to the site which otherwise does a great job ). However I was
under the impression that the docs team w
eting reminder to -dev, but how many projects really have meetings
that often? Do they accomplish anything? Should we have someone that
tries to attend most meetings to make sure things are going smoothly, or
going at all? Do we need to have slacking projects that get killed off
by the council as
g that number of users/permissions is
a nightmare.
But those are the two biggest problems in my estimation. No one wishes
to impede the GDP here, Most of the docs I want to write are internal
portage API docs/FAQ/Howto's, and I doubt you will see users pounding on
the door to read
kay, maybe that's
> really the only other sane ordering.)
I would prefer to keep USE_ORDER for now, since I was going to replace
the "auto" dict with the "default-iuse" which means you can choose not
to stack these new flags. Although it may be a hack, we have no better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Lares Moreau wrote:
>
>> Could you post updates once a week(or two), similar to what [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> does with the aging ebuilds. I don't feel a play-by-play is necessary.
>
>
> I will be posting daily updates until it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Köhler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so look at this:
>
> # equery l |grep sun-jdk
> dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.10
> dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5.0.06-r2
>
> # emerge -up sun-jdk
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies ..
re is an exception thrown for kde-base/metadata.xml. I have
nfc what the hell that is doing in package.mask, but I was told it was
already fixed ;)
- -Alec Warner (antarus)
[1] http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/stale-p.mask.list
[2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/stale-p.mask.py
-BEGIN PGP SIGN
Marius Mauch wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:17:24 -0500
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a
really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask
e
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:17, Alec Warner wrote:
I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a
really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask
entries were really referencing anything or not. Luckily Brian was able
to
s to not encourage this type of behavior;
intentially breaking ~arch all the time and then making the arch teams
"clean up" so to speak. I don't believe this to be the case here, I
just don't want to see it become commonplace ;)
Alec Warner (antarus
is no way around this, in my reckoning, without giving the user a
complete system to start with. Then they can't trigger silly ass
circular deps, because guess what, the base system is already installed!
If openSSL depends on perl and perl depends on openSSL, who cares,
they are both inst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There are a couple of bugs against repoman that request repoman detect
and do things for the developer. The two cases are:
repoman does not auto-commit new license files[1]
repoman should cvs add files/ if it isn't already[2]
I personally am against
Marcelo Góes wrote:
> It seems there are some ebuilds with a logrotate USE flag:
> Perhaps it should be a global USE flag?
We have discussed this "fairly recently"[1] so I'll post the link to
save everyone the hassle.
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-dev&w=2&r=1&s=logrotate&q=b
>
>
I've been having a crapton of problems with sending to this list, just
making sure I got them all resolved :)
Sorry for the Spam
-Alec Warner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
doing that but would like feedback on it before jumping right in.
Obviously the QA team should be aware of the issue with USE_EXPAND and IUSE.
I don't want to rush this, is my point ;)
-Alec Warner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Grobian wrote:
> Please find attached GLEP 47: "Creating 'safe' environment variables".
>
> The GLEP is a Gentoo/Alt initiative. Constructive comments are welcome.
>
>
> The variables ``ELIBC``, ``KERNEL`` and ``ARCH`` are currently set in
> the profiles when other than their defaults for a GN
t;What about env.d? Gnome could install and env file that by default
>>>sets XSESSION to gnome.
>>
>>Can't do... you can have gnome, kde, xfce, etc all installed at the same
>>time.
>>
>>
-Alec Warner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hat isn't
possible ( PATH issues? ).
If anyone has any reason to keep dopython around please voice your
concerns now, as we will probably be killing it in the next bump of 2.1
-Alec Warner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
mments is useful ( and in some
limited cases I would agree with you ) giving people the opportunity to
comment also means you just covered your ass, in terms of people going
"where the hell did that come from?"
-Alec Warner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rename it ( hell you can even provide
them with the wget command to do so ). As such, glad this is resolved
with at least some agreement on all sides :)
--Alec Warner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
bbapm has been masked due to no one responding with anything useful to
last rites e-mail. It will be punted in 30 days.
-Alec Warner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:15:13 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | bbapm has been masked due to no one responding with anything useful to
> | last rites e-mail. It will be punted in 30 days.
>
> No no no. Do this properly. Clean up *
donzens of packages that die in pkg_setup if incorrect USE flags are
sepcified, because use-dependencies are not implemented. I don't
believe anyone is trying to enforce interactivity in that case, because
as far as I'm aware there is no workaround present.
-Alec Warner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
lved.
No proof?
Sheesh, you'll probably claim that this isn't broken next too:
if [ "${IS_UPGRADE}" = "1" ] ; then
einfo "Removing old version ${REMOVE_PKG}"
emerge -C "${REMOVE_PKG}"
fi
Semantics of the logic aside, calling emerge from within an ebuild is a
BIG nono.
-Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 February 2006 16:02, Jakub Moc wrote:
>
>>28.2.2006, 21:39:43, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>>>whats your point ? if an ebuild author wants to control the SLOT, then
>>>they should be able to without having an invalid warning issued on the
>>>subject
>>>
>>>consi
Mark Loeser wrote:
> Here is my updated version after some feedback from people:
> * In the case of disagreement on policy among QA members, the majority
> of established QA members must agree with the action.
What is an "Established QA member"?
>
>
> I guess this won't be reviewed by the cou
No they won't, but elog in portage-2.1 will gladly send them a message
via whatever configuration they have about the warning that the ebuild
produced.
-Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Michael Renner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as suggested by Mike in http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123335,
> here's my proposal for changing the layout of the distfiles tree:
> Introducing an additional directory hierarchy should fix this, and is
> the common solution for this problem for various pro
f a specific set of USE flags conflict or not, if we provide it
with that information it can at least die during depgraph creation
stating what the problem is with the depgraph ( getting closer to having
actaul buildplans... ).
-Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Michael Renner wrote:
Kurt Lieber wrote:
If we can come up with a seamless, painless transition process, great,
let's make it happen.
From the _MIRROR_-side using hardlinks should be fine enough, we'd just
have to ensure that every mirror uses -H (preserve hardlinks). And for
the mirror
I'd prefer the mirrors not be special cased in a mapping since. URI's
are URI's are URI's...
-Alec Warner
-
[1] dev.gentoo.org/~antarus/URI_check.py
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
rtage team, so while it's a powerful
tool for some users, it's also quite volatile in terms of how it is
sourced. It should not be depended on.
-Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
hat isn't killed by -*.
Whatever the fix is we should be able to make a 2.0.54-r1 release with
it, still need to talk to Zac, if anyone has any comments on this, now
would be the time ;)
-Alec Warner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:20:33 -0500
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Basically portage expands $ARCH into use ( so
x86-fbsd has ARCH x86, and would get "x86" in use, which IMHO, isn't
that horrible ). However, you also don't get x86-fb
QA warnings that they thought were fixed or that there
were no QA warnings when there should have been...etc..
-Other ideas are always welcome; I'd prefer to get this solved soon.
-Alec Warner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
m h wrote:
> I'm not a gentoo dev (just a satisfied user), but I lurk on this list.
>
> I was at PyCon last month. I would estimate that about 40% of the
> people there ran linux on their laptops. The most popular distros
> were gentoo and ubuntu. (Not this is not a scientific study, just my
>
essence, creating
a bunch of small communities for development.
Thoughts on ideas on this somewhat more focussed idea? ( or at least I
think it's more focused :P )
-Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> On 3/24/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Thoughts on ideas on this somewhat more focussed idea? ( or at least I
>>think it's more focused :P )
>
>
> IMO motivation b) is not taken into account enough.
>
> You a
> caution of the main tree, or you'll have a very hard time getting
> support from the developer community at large.
>
+1
At least in my mind the overlays should be developmental overlays; not
for public comsumption. This doesn't mean "don't tell anyone about it
so that no one shows up." It means "interested users will probably
inquire about helping out, etc...and can be granted access fairly easily."
-Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Thanks for the summary. I think that's a fair assessment of where we are at.
>
> The offered software will be trac, svn, and moinmoin. I'm going to
> look at darcs, and with the help of the haskell team and infra
> determine if we can support it or not. No-one has expres
Ingo Bormuth wrote:
Hi dev-list,
what is the rule concerning when to introduce new virtuals?
I created an ebuild for metaocaml which is a real drop in replacement for
the ocaml programming language allowing for metaprogramming and dynamic
linking. Metaocaml in fact is a patched version of oca
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 18:26:27 +0100 Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | We have a fair number of packages in the tree (57 someone said, but a
> | non-trivial number) which depend upon sys-apps/acl for ACL support.
> | Since the packages needed for this differ bet
and the list is created. Removing
items from it could cause packages to not build, and the dependency tree
to essentially be broken for that list.
Also, portage questions are generally well received at
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org, or on IRC: irc.freenode.net #gentoo-portage.
-Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> point for new chunks to add to the official or unofficial handbooks.
>
> --
> TGL.
+1, plus the ML is archived unlike IRC, and users can search archives
and we could more easily compile a FAQ about ebuild writing and such.
-Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Simon Stelling wrote:
Graham Murray wrote:
Fabian Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What I'd like portage do to is to create a symlink to the latest version
of a package's documentation. Just omitting the version number would of
course not work as slotted packages may have multiple versions
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
Hi all,
what did happen to my surprise. I remerged some libraries. Suddenly my
subversion client stopped working because of missing libraries. Please
remember, this is the reason we have SLOTS. The slot of a library package
should change whenever the SONAME does. This is
ver leaving it on all the time merely imposes penalties on the power
users who wish to use your profile. Your profile is a tool that should
be useful to all classes of users.
-Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Simon Stelling wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
We are working to ensure the dependencies work as smoothly as possible,
but I expect there will be some issues since it's difficult to require
updates to all these optional drivers following an update to the server.
wouldn'
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Olivier Crête wrote:
On Mon, 2006-17-04 at 13:05 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Alec Warner wrote:
Well the semantics of the blocker is that the new driver won't work
with the old server; is that true? Or just the old drivers won't
work with the new ser
A valid problem with this approach. Is requiring everyone to unmerge
drivers a worse solution than breaking some people who emerged drivers
directly?
I very much dislike making people unmerge things. It's not intuitive
for anyone, having to remove the old program to upgrade a dependency
Philipp Riegger wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Duncan wrote:
>
>>> But i really think this is not about helping but about confusion. If i
>>> post my emerge --info you don't know if i really use confcache even
>>> if i
>>> have FEATURES="confcache", because emerge --info does not say if i
Alin Nastac wrote:
> Lets say a package foo depends on bar, both at compile time and run time.
> Shouldn't DEPEND _and_ RDEPEND of the foo package reflect that
> dependency? I usually set DEPEND="$RDEPEND ..." or vice-versa (depending
> on which is the most demanding). Am I utterly wrong here?
> I
As many of you know by now, Gentoo has been chosen to fill one of the
last spaces in this year's Google Summer of Code. This is a great
opportunity for developers and users to interact and help out Gentoo as
well as the OSS community.
For those of you who haven't heard of Google's Summer of Code,
Alec Warner wrote:
> But
> anyone who is a Gentoo developer can mentor a Student on one of the
> projects for which Gentoo is the Mentoring Organization.
I had four people proofread and I still screwed up. Once again, ANYONE
is eligible to Mentor a student on behalf of Gentoo. If you
Ryan Phillips wrote:
> This is a follow up to Mark's (halcy0n's) thread regarding QA Policies and
> seemant's letter on herds, teams, and projects.
>
> I believe the way Gentoo is doing things is broken. There I have said it.
> The
> entire project has reached a level of being too political and
ly cvs2svn is almost done, and
git cvsimport is chugging along. Not really a fan of bzr for us but we
use it for pkgcore, so I'll fire that up as well.
I haven't looked at mercurial but it is on the list ;)
-Alec Warner
> Mercurial should use a bit less disk and git should be a lit
In an attempt to receive more comments and to request comments on the
virtual/config-manager, I have forwarded this mail here. Please comment
+ point out weird things wrong. I'd prefer to make either dispatch-conf
or cfg-update the default for the virtual, but I am definately open to
discuss
d then have to hunt you down on irc to figure out why it's there.
Courtesy towards fellow developers, especially when commiting to global spaces
such as profiles/ is appreciated by all.
-Thanks
Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 01:26 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2006 10:13:36 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > On Wed, 10 May 2006 00:07:29 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
> | >
> | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > | so discussion with at leas
er to see the profile you are commiting then; do you have a
link?
-Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
nformation from it.
-Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Otherwise paludis will end up
being...well..a fork.
-Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
The promissed glep on package manager requirements. Please comment on it.
There are some parts that may be controversial (portage has in the past not
provided support for reverting to stable either), but please keep the
discussion on topic.
Paul
s/primary/official/g
ewrite of 6000+ lines of code just to
make it "usable".
You make it seem like some easily solvable thing that anyone can do.
You make it seem like the dep-resolver the portage team envisions is
child's play to write. Frankly I don't see where these assertions come
from.
Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ake infra do my bidding, even
if it's merited on a technical level.
-Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
This doens't build at all as the buildsystem is too old and needs
updating to work with new automake versions.
I will pmask this and remove it in 30 days unless someone speaks up.
-Antarus
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
I've taken the liberty of cleaning out some of pmask.
Pretty much anything pre-2004 that covers stuff that isn't in the tree.
Removed:
Bug 43658 is closed, we only have ebuilds for 1.2.10
# <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (03 Mar 2004)
# security problems. see bug #43658.
(30 Dec 2004)
# Junkie being maske
This guy is a security nightmare and has been masked on and off for
security vulnerabilities[1] for the last two years. If no one objects I
will punt it from the tree in 30 days.
[1]http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70090
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Francesco Riosa wrote:
> Both dev-db/xmysqladmin and dev-db/mysqlnavigator has no active homepage.
> Both need to be patched to compile agains mysql-4.1.10a (avoiding
> OLD_FUNCTIONS workaround).
> expecially "xmysqladmin" seems to be unsupported anymore.
>
> It's possible to remove them from port
powerd has an open security vulnerability [1] and no maintainer.
Someone can claim it in the next 30 days or I will punt it then.
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70373
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
sys-fs/convertfs has an open bug [1] and is seeking a maintainer, if
none is found I will punt it in 30 days, per the usual.
-Antarus
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107635
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The dev-util/perforce packages:
>
> - dev-util/perforce
> - dev-util/perforce-cli
> - dev-util/perforce-gui
> - dev-util/perforce-proxy
> - dev-util/perforce-server
>
> are in need of a new maintainer. If no-one volunteers in time, the
> packages will be masked S
Good candidate for last rites...
- SRC_URI dead, so this only lives on Gentoo mirrors
- no maintainer, this bug[1] has been sitting here for 2 1/2 years
So without further ado, pmasked for 30 days pending removal.
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32672
signature.asc
Description: Open
So we created this awesome alias to put ebuilds that need a maintainer.
Good idea at the time, decent idea still. The problem? We have nearly
2000 open bugs assigned to maintainer-wanted[1]. I would like to
discuss policy on these. Do we keep them, do we get a group of people
to slowly review
ipkg-utils was maintained by tigger who is no longer a dev. As far as
tigger/solar are aware there is no reason to keep it in the tree. It
will be pmask'd and punted in 30 days at their request.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 19:48:39 +0200
Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem is actually that such a document is a living thing and it
must not only exist initially but be maintained continuously.
Must it? I'd be more inclined to say that if it needs to cha
sked and never
removed. The 30 day period allows everyone using the package to see the
masking message and the corresponding bug when they use portage.
Questions and Comments are welcome, as always.
-Alec Warner
[1] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Sunday 04 June 2006 14:56, Mike Frysinger wrote:
what about TV_CAPTURE_CARDS
You got it quite wrong, it's not about the TV cards :)
It's about TV guide grabbers.
TV_GUIDE_GRABBERS
see that was easy ;)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Slipping this in before 2.1 goes stable, it's a small check.
Basically if your ebuild inherits a VCS eclass ( currently darcs,
subversion, cvs ) AND your ebuild has stable keywords on any arches
repoman will report an error.
One thing to note here:
Are there any cases when one inherits a VCS
Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 02:24:24AM -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 11:14:45AM +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 01:54:08AM -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:19:41AM +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Mon, Jun 0
Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
On Втр, 2006-06-06 at 00:17 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
That's why we use a SCM for managing the ebuilds: the removed ebuilds
are still found via cvs commands and on sources.gentoo.org
But how can I search for removed ebuild in cvs? Is there any quick w
Grant Goodyear wrote:
Zac Medico wrote: [Wed Jun 07 2006, 01:30:38PM CDT]
Mike Frysinger wrote:
this is a *huge* con ... developers are lazy, *i'm* lazy ... i
certainly do not want to go through every single package i maintain
and add 'debug-build' to IUSE or 'inherit some-new-eclass'
Somet
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 16:05 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
We've discussed this multiple times, and it's always been the conclusion
that per package.env should go in bashrc, as bashrc is generally more
powerful than anything we could devise. The only downside afaik, f
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 19:12, Alec Warner wrote:
I would be more concerned with convincing the rest of the developers.
adding crap in base profile.bashrc will affect 99% of users, so it
better be friggin correct and useful, otherwise you will piss a ton of
people off
Matteo Azzali wrote:
This is just a mine question, but it seems that since gcc-4.1 got it's
way into portage (~branch) things are getting slower.
Lots of the bugs blocking bug #117482 -
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117482 - have a patch in the report
or an ebuild for revision bump, te
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 06:49 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 19:12, Alec Warner wrote:
I would be more concerned with convincing the rest of the developers.
adding crap in base profile.bashrc will affect 99% of users, so it
better
Jon Portnoy wrote:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:32:13AM -0400, Thomas Cort wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 09:20:18 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please keep the games bugs in bugzilla. Making this change is a direct
change in games team policy without any prior notice to the ga
Grant Goodyear wrote:
Stefan Schweizer wrote: [Wed Jun 07 2006, 07:42:03PM CDT]
Initially jokey and myself will be working on this. The current focus is to
migrate ebuilds from bugzilla into the overlay and to get contributors to
commit their changes to the overlay instead of updating the bugzi
Why? Because having two year old bugs is simply inexcusable. Especially
when many have not had any activity for a long time. Having
maintainer-wanted bugs for months on end is silly. Giving a user who files
a ebuild request or submits an ebuild deserves the chance to take
ownership of it. It's a g
Roy Marples wrote:
Some packages provide both a client and a server. As such, users usually only
want one or the other - and rarely both.
A good candidate is net-misc/dhcp as it installs a DHCP client and server.
Which makes no sense really, so I'd like to put some USE flags here to show
what
Portage-2.1 final is released,
RELEASE-NOTES[1]
NEWS[2]
BUGS-FIXED[3]
STABLIZING BUG[4]
[1]http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES?view=markup
[2]http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/NEWS?view=markup
[3]http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11583
Wernfried Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:12:31PM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Portage-2.1 final is released,
Congrats to the portage team!
While i'm at it, may i ask which files are affected by these changes /
which docs i missed to read?
* config files as directories enabling
Roy Marples wrote:
On Friday 09 June 2006 23:34, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 09 June 2006 16:35, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
This is the "official" (hehe) request for comments on making a policy of
how to handle ebuilds than can be used for either client or server and
how to allow for buildin
Lack of content and poorly written or incorrect articles are often
justified by the GWN team on grounds of overwork and insufficient
manpower. When I asked why they were not recruiting, I was informed that
no-one has any interest in contributing.
There's a big difference between one-off articles
1 - 100 of 1224 matches
Mail list logo
